• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

Granted, the MM's were technically asymmetrical as well - an argument frequently used against them - but there was more of an established purpose there, considering such a cross-over design was used in tunic construction for centuries by various militaries - another argument frequently used against them for being too militaristic-looking. :lol:
And well, ugly.
 
Starfleet uniforms with pockets violate Gene's vision of the future. A future were we have evolved from the need to have clothes with pockets, for who needs pockets when they have no wallets to put in them.
 
Starfleet uniforms with pockets violate Gene's vision of the future. A future were we have evolved from the need to have clothes with pockets, for who needs pockets when they have no wallets to put in them.
Wait until you find out the original design for Starfleet uniforms during the United Earth era included a small pocket for tiny monkeys.
 
ENT and TOS (and to some degree SNW) have the only uniforms that seem to make sense. ENT has pockets, so it wins.
All future uniforms needs more pockets.

Then StarFleet Officers can fill those pockets with useful EDC style gear.

How many times has a Random StarFleet Officer been suddenly "Kidnapped, beamed away, disappeared, taken hostage, stranded somewhere"?

And those poor officers have nothing on their person but the clothes on their back.

At least if they filled their pockets with useful gear, they could be ready.

Space is dangerous after all, who knows what random craziness will happen to you out there.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top