• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Welcome to the future

Well it shows that people are ignorant. Global Warming can cause colder weather in northern longitudes because increase warming can change ocean currents and the jet stream. People think Global Warming is like living in a greenhouse but it's affects are much subtler than that.


Yes yes yes this! ^^

...and, whether you subscribe to the cause/effect or not, it is EVER so easy to get an overview of how Global Warming affects us...as easy as doing research for some threads and questions for our ST...to be informed and not be ignorant...
 
The melting Arctic story is a bit premature. It's rebounding and set to cross above normal in about two or three months, and will probably return to heavy ice conditions just as it does about every 60 or 70 years. Judith Curry, chair of climate science at Georgia Tech, published a paper on what she termed a "stadium wave", which tries to unravel what drives what. The North Atlantic Oscillation does something, then later the Arctic Oscillation will follow suit, followed by some other oscillation, and so on, similar to how a wave moves around a stadium just by people copying what other people nearby are doing.

This past week there have been several really important papers on the lack of synchronicity between Artic and Antarctic cycles, and the underlying causes (different basic drivers), along with a much better theoretical model of Dansgaard-Oeschger events which is a cyclic pattern during interglacials, which seem to be driven by the Arctic advance and collapse.
 
The poor will suffer most because God hates poor people. That's why they're poor. As for regional assessments, they're worthless. The IMF warns poor countries not to base any of their planning on climate assessments, because one climatology group will insist that future rainfall will drop by 30 percent, advising that scare dollars go towards conserving water, and another group will insist that rainfall will increase by 50 percent and that scare dollars should go to flood abatement. You're better off going to a palm reader or a psychic.

But of course in the past century we've advanced past that stage of existence. Arrhenius' back-of-the-envelope 1800's calculation of climate sensitivity was 1 to 5 degree C, but he only had a slide rule and a very tiny data set, not the billions of dollars of supercomputer power we have now. Given the billionfold leap in data and analysis, the IPCC's AR5 puts it at 1.3 to 4.5 degrees C, very slightly narrower than Arrhenius SWAG.

A century of research and tens of billions thrown at the problem, and they're still flinging sh*t at a wall.
 

Exodus 20:17 said:
Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.

That's not really the meaning of that one.




...no worries about me coveting my neighbor's ass...NO worries... :guffaw:

...but I covet his house and deck...fuckers got a MAXimum crib with an outrageous deck...and a Star Trek Man Room, that if I could figure out how to Steal ( I know, the Eighth) I would do it in a heartbeat...

...but this is off-topic...

...or...maybe not...
 
The melting Arctic story is a bit premature. It's rebounding and set to cross above normal in about two or three months, and will probably return to heavy ice conditions just as it does about every 60 or 70 years.
This is the only time I have seena statement like this anywhere. Source?

Also, winter Down Here is quite mild right now. Perhaps even too mild...
 
The National Snow and Ice Data Center. The Arctic retained a whole lot of ice this year. Heck, on Memorial Day people couldn't swim in parts of lake Michigan because of the floating ice.

As I recall from the other day, in an addendum to XKCD's comic, he restated the change as 2C instead of 4.5 C. 2C is the change you get when you drive 180 miles closer to the tropics. Additionally, most of that change isn't an increase in high temperatures, it's an increase from the low temperatures. If you live in a big city, you've already probably got 1.2 to 1.6 C degrees of urban heat island effect, so you could move to the burbs and avoid 50 years of the catastrophic warming, or make arrangements for a suburban couple to take you in as a climate refugee till you retire and move to Cancun.
 
BEIJING — China’s plans for 50 coal gasification plants will produce an estimated 1.1 billion tons of carbon dioxide per year and contribute significantly to climate change, according to a report released Wednesday by Greenpeace East Asia.

The plants, aimed in part at reducing pollution from coal-fired power plants in China’s largest cities, will shift that pollution to other regions, mostly in the northwest, and generate enormous amounts of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas produced by fossil fuels, said the organization, which is based in Beijing.

If China builds all 50 plants, the carbon dioxide they produce will equal about an eighth of China’s current total carbon dioxide emissions, which come mostly from coal-burning power plants and factories, the organization said. Two of the plants have already been built as pilot projects, three more are under construction, 16 have been given the green light to be built and the rest are in various planning stages, according to the report.

Last September, the government announced a plan to alleviate air pollution in China’s notoriously smoggy cities. The plan would reduce coal use in the most populated areas by 2017.

Since then, officials have been looking for other ways to provide power for those areas, including the building of scores of coal-to-gas plants, mostly in northwest China. They would take the place of current coal-burning power plants in China’s most populated areas, including the heavily polluted northern region that includes the cities of Beijing and Tianjin.

Coal-to-gas, or coal gasification, is a water-intensive process that generates enormous amounts of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas destabilizing the world’s climate. Many scientists have criticized the process and said its use would be even worse for global climate conditions than burning coal, which produces carbon dioxide and other pollutants.

Chinese state-owned power companies categorize proposed plants as “clean energy” or “new energy.” China is responsible for half of the annual global coal consumption and is the world’s biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, followed by the United States. Chinese and American officials have been engaged in on-and-off negotiations for years over how each nation can pledge to cap or reduce its coal use to try to avert severe climate change.
Link
 
Coal gasification produces even more CO2 than burning coal? Does the reaction make little baby carbon atoms or something?

C + H20 > CO + H2
CO + H2 + O2 > CO2 + H2O
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top