• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Was the Dominion hell-bent on war?

Some minutiae...

I have to question how the probe communicated back with the Federation from so far away since that was a major issue with Voyager until Project Pathfinder.
We don't know that it was a Federation probe as such. It could have been a much older one, the benefits of which the Federation reaped.

And it may be that the probe could not communicate across that distance, but instead flew there and back. Or, alternatively, that the probe was of Gamma Quadrant origin and flew from there to a location where the Federation could analyze its findings.

Which would mean that between the 22nd century and "The Emissary", thus within 200-250 years, it had covered those 70,000 ly. Not bad going, but not quite on par with Janeway's claim that the Voyager at maximum speed could have done it in 70 years.

Of course, the VOY episode "Friendship One" casts some doubt on this, as a probe decidedly launched from Earth in 2067 decidedly was in contact with Earth until 130 years before the episode, thus in the 2240s, and decidedly reached a target some 30,000 ly away at some unknown timepoint before the 2370s...

As for whether the Dominion could have captured the Quadros 1 probe, it's extremely unlikely given how vast space is, and how small the probe would be. And Friendship 1 seemed to be a relatively unique emissary for mankind, so it doesn't sound all that likely that the skies over Dominion planets would be littered with Earth or Federation probes. But in theory, Friendship 3 might have been launched in that direction, and might have been obnoxious enough to attract local attention... Most probes probably aren't that noisy and cheerfully annoying.

Timo Saloniemi
 
Some minutiae...

I have to question how the probe communicated back with the Federation from so far away since that was a major issue with Voyager until Project Pathfinder.
We don't know that it was a Federation probe as such. It could have been a much older one, the benefits of which the Federation reaped.

And it may be that the probe could not communicate across that distance, but instead flew there and back. Or, alternatively, that the probe was of Gamma Quadrant origin and flew from there to a location where the Federation could analyze its findings.

Which would mean that between the 22nd century and "The Emissary", thus within 200-250 years, it had covered those 70,000 ly. Not bad going, but not quite on par with Janeway's claim that the Voyager at maximum speed could have done it in 70 years.

Of course, the VOY episode "Friendship One" casts some doubt on this, as a probe decidedly launched from Earth in 2067 decidedly was in contact with Earth until 130 years before the episode, thus in the 2240s, and decidedly reached a target some 30,000 ly away at some unknown timepoint before the 2370s...

As for whether the Dominion could have captured the Quadros 1 probe, it's extremely unlikely given how vast space is, and how small the probe would be. And Friendship 1 seemed to be a relatively unique emissary for mankind, so it doesn't sound all that likely that the skies over Dominion planets would be littered with Earth or Federation probes. But in theory, Friendship 3 might have been launched in that direction, and might have been obnoxious enough to attract local attention... Most probes probably aren't that noisy and cheerfully annoying.

Timo Saloniemi

Well, a subspace radio message from the Enterprise-D in the Triangulum galaxy, which is 2,600,000 light years from the Federation, would take 51 years to get to Starfleet Command, so it's possible that the probe could send the data back in subspace messages, which would allow the information to reach the Federation before the events of "Emissary"...
 
Let's remember that in the exact quote, the message would take

Data: "...fifty-one years, ten months, nine weeks, sixteen days-"

which is rather odd when you look at it more closely. Why would anybody say "10 months, 9 weeks" when it equates the more sensible "12 months, one week"? Why would anybody say "9 weeks, 16 days" when that equates "11 weeks, 2 days"?

We may have to assume that Data wasn't listing the message travel time to the precision of days - but giving at least three possible, different travel times. By method A, the message would take 51 years, yet by method B, only 10 months, and by method C, just 9 weeks, and so forth. Perhaps Data is aware of a great number of long range communications methods, most of which are hypothetical or impractical?

Timo Saloniemi
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top