Trek may have done it, but it's still silly for a high-ranking security chief who's also tactical officer to be off fighting random intruders. That's a job for his "deputies."
Agreed Sonak, I would have thought the Chief's job was to manage his team.
^Wouldn't that be micro-managing. The Security's chief should be trained well enough to respond to intruder alarms/red alerts etc.. Without the chief getting on the intercom to say go to deck 12 section 10. If they absolutly need the chief they can call for him.
Remember Security Chief basically means head of department. The head of department is responsible for making sure that department runs and reporting any problems up the chain of command.
In the 24th century weapons will acquire targets on their own, without officers. So we don't need either character. Having two would have been silly, and none of the other series had more than one.I think they could have worked together as Lance said by dividing Security and Tactical with a bit of overlay between the two, or maybe having Tactical a division under Security.
During battle, Tasha could have been handling phasers, picking targets letting Picard know weapons status, and Worf the photons and shields and relaying their status. I, for one, never saw why 1 person handled both sets of weapons. Dividing them would have made "Fire all weapons" a better options as each could have picked a target area and fired.
Intruder alert would only have Tasha leaving weapons. When the bridge was boarded, like in The High Ground, you would have had 2 armed people ready to take on the boarders. Worf could have left to protect Picard (that could have been his assigned duty as well) leaving Tasha to handle the intruders.
There was plenty of room for both characters.
^Wouldn't that be micro-managing. The Security's chief should be trained well enough to respond to intruder alarms/red alerts etc.. Without the chief getting on the intercom to say go to deck 12 section 10. If they absolutly need the chief they can call for him.
Remember Security Chief basically means head of department. The head of department is responsible for making sure that department runs and reporting any problems up the chain of command.
^Wouldn't that be micro-managing. The Security's chief should be trained well enough to respond to intruder alarms/red alerts etc.. Without the chief getting on the intercom to say go to deck 12 section 10. If they absolutly need the chief they can call for him.
Remember Security Chief basically means head of department. The head of department is responsible for making sure that department runs and reporting any problems up the chain of command.
exactly. Trek has funny ideas about what department heads do. I'm guessing it's because a lot of the writers don't have extensive familiarity with the military, but yeah, department heads don't run off to micromanage every little problem that comes up.
Much of this has to do with giving the regulars stuff to do, regardless if it makes logical sense. You have a limited number of cast members so they end up doing multiple jobs so they can be worth the money being paid. That said, it's silly how shows have senior staff directing things they shouldn't. Once the Captain gives the order to fire on a vessel or capture an intruder, s/he should realistically shut up and let the trained professionals do their jobs. It should be Worf reporting that the intruder has been detected in section such-and-such and that he's doing this-and-that to trap them, not Riker telling him what sections to seal off.
I think it's analogous to the X-Men when they brought in the new team of Storm, Colossus, Nightcrawler, Thunderbird, and Wolverine. There wasn't really a lot of difference between Thunderbird and Wolvie, especially personality-wise, plus Wolverine had those freaky claws, so guess who now has to die horribly for the sake of the team? It ain't the Canuck with the muttonchops.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.