• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Was pretty excited for this show.. but ultimately underwhelmed...

Again, so what? The guy coming out the other end will make the exact same actions, choices, and decisions as the character we have been watching up until this point. The writers consider him the same guy, so they will write him to behave the same as if this process had never happened. The actor considers him the same guy, so he will play him the same as he has for 30 years. So who cares if it is a copy or not a copy? And their goal is accomplished: handwavium has been employed, Irumodic Syndrome is dealt with. They can have however many seasons they want with Picard because their character doesn't have to die of an illness conceived 30 years ago.

Well not really. Stewart is 80 now. So I'm guessing 2 more seasons. Killing picard off the first season was a mistake. They should have waited till the last season.
 
I see.
>I wasnt talking about just a 5 episode story each season. But rather a
>couple.


I think you are right about this. The show could have been edited to just 3 or 4 episodes like the new X-files mini series was created.

I found it took a while to introduce Data's daughters in the new Picard show, Dahj and Soji.

>The 10 episodes we got have major pacing issues and didnt have to be 10 episode.

I see.

<Spock's body wasnt new but regenerated by terraforming. Healed so to speak. It went from being de-aged back to its adult >form.

I see.


>We really dont know if that was all Kirk in turnabout intruder. If the Kirk Body had died with Lester's "consciousness" 100% of >what makes Kirk's kirk would have been dead.

I see.

>So only his memories and mannerisms would exist in a female body.

I see.

>People try to use the same argument with the transporters. Many have tried to use the argument that when you are beamed >you have a new body and they are not the same person. Just because of an episode that kinda implied you can make a >new body. But I can name THREE times when people were conscious during beam out and actually moving IN THE BEAM.

I see.

>Yet people have used that erroneapus reasoning to excuse away stuff like Picard Not being Picard.

Very true.

>Same with this. Just because Kirk's memory was downloaded into lester and vice versa does not mean they are 100% that >person.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

I think you are right about this, Dar70. In fact, it could be that Picard might have been dead all along. But it was not until episode 10 that he realizes that he did indeed die.

>Anyhow. At 1:36. Sounds like a copy to me. The Real Picard is dead. And if the creators push the fact that hes not...its a plot >hole imo.
 
Well not really. Stewart is 80 now. So I'm guessing 2 more seasons. Killing picard off the first season was a mistake. They should have waited till the last season.
At the risk of bringing up memories of our Enterprise watching brethren from years past, Not. Dead.

But I notice you sidestepped the question of what difference it makes whether he is technically a copy or not.
 
Maybe so. But people might lose interest over time. As it is, The Orvillle seems to have attracted a lot of actors, writers, and even producers from the original Star Trek: The Next Generation

Again, so what? The guy coming out the other end will make the exact same actions, choices, and decisions as the character we have been watching up until this point. The writers consider him the same guy, so they will write him to behave the same as if this process had never happened. The actor considers him the same guy, so he will play him the same as he has for 30 years. So who cares if it is a copy or not a copy? And their goal is accomplished: handwavium has been employed, Irumodic Syndrome is dealt with. They can have however many seasons they want with Picard because their character doesn't have to die of an illness conceived 30 years ago.
 
Maybe so. But this kind of reminds me of The Terminator in that the Terminator does not remember the events of each new movie as he is respawned.

Again, so what? The guy coming out the other end will make the exact same actions, choices, and decisions as the character we have been watching up until this point. The writers consider him the same guy, so they will write him to behave the same as if this process had never happened. The actor considers him the same guy, so he will play him the same as he has for 30 years. So who cares if it is a copy or not a copy? And their goal is accomplished: handwavium has been employed, Irumodic Syndrome is dealt with. They can have however many seasons they want with Picard because their character doesn't have to die of an illness conceived 30 years ago.
 
Again, so what? The guy coming out the other end will make the exact same actions, choices, and decisions as the character we have been watching up until this point. The writers consider him the same guy, so they will write him to behave the same as if this process had never happened. The actor considers him the same guy, so he will play him the same as he has for 30 years. So who cares if it is a copy or not a copy? And their goal is accomplished: handwavium has been employed, Irumodic Syndrome is dealt with. They can have however many seasons they want with Picard because their character doesn't have to die of an illness conceived 30 years ago.
Indeed so. And I've yet to hear a substantial argument about what difference it makes. I've heard a very emotional one but not a very logical one. So, with due respect to those who consider Picard super important I simply find that him being a copy or not to be a nonissue. I also think that this is a detail that people are allowing to ruin their enjoyment for rather trivial reasons.
 
I think Picard had a lot of potential at least when the show was being advertised. But one must take into consideration that like Discovery, Picard is being aired on the CBS Streaming service. If Picard would have been shown on regular TV, like its predecessor ST:TNG, it might have been edited moreclosely.

I agree with you that Picard was a mere copy.

Indeed so. And I've yet to hear a substantial argument about what difference it makes. I've heard a very emotional one but not a very logical one. So, with due respect to those who consider Picard super important I simply find that him being a copy or not to be a nonissue. I also think that this is a detail that people are allowing to ruin their enjoyment for rather trivial reasons.
 
I see. Ok, sorry about the confusion Fireproof78.
No worries. Could have been more clear. I see it like Kirk's essence being transferred from his body to Janice Lester's in "Turnabout Intruder" or Chakotay's spirit being separated in "Distant Voices" (I think). It's not the first time Trek has done this is my point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sci
No worries. Could have been more clear. I see it like Kirk's essence being transferred from his body to Janice Lester's in "Turnabout Intruder" or Chakotay's spirit being separated in "Distant Voices" (I think). It's not the first time Trek has done this is my point.
Consciousness transfer has happened numerous times in Trek. Janice Lester, Spock's Katra, glowy alien balls of criminals, etc. In my opinion, all we are quibbling about here is the type of receptacle used and whether that makes the consciousness "real." I went to a convention in Tulsa back when Voyager was on the air, and they had one of the writers on (for the life of me I don't remember which one) and he said they would get letters complaining if they put the wrong pips on someone's collar. So from that point forward in the Q&A whenever he would talk about the craft of storytelling, or the character's journey and someone would ask some absurdly nitpickey question about minor details, he would just look at them and say "Pips." That's what I think of every time someone complains about Picard being dead or a copy, I just imagine the writers room saying "Pips."
 
Consciousness transfer has happened numerous times in Trek. Janice Lester, Spock's Katra, glowy alien balls of criminals, etc. In my opinion, all we are quibbling about here is the type of receptacle used and whether that makes the consciousness "real." I went to a convention in Tulsa back when Voyager was on the air, and they had one of the writers on (for the life of me I don't remember which one) and he said they would get letters complaining if they put the wrong pips on someone's collar. So from that point forward in the Q&A whenever he would talk about the craft of storytelling, or the character's journey and someone would ask some absurdly nitpickey question about minor details, he would just look at them and say "Pips." That's what I think of every time someone complains about Picard being dead or a copy, I just imagine the writers room saying "Pips."
And that's exactly so. To my mind the writers are treating him as Picard. Yeah, that's word of God type stuff but that's where I'm at. And, I think that wondering about Picard is honestly just looking for a reason to hate the show rather than engage it on its own terms.
 
And that's exactly so. To my mind the writers are treating him as Picard. Yeah, that's word of God type stuff but that's where I'm at. And, I think that wondering about Picard is honestly just looking for a reason to hate the show rather than engage it on its own terms.
Exactly. They have established numerous times that consciousness transfer is possible. So if we've established it is possible in multiple different ways, to look at this one way and say "No, THAT one doesn't work," just seems to me to be complaining to complain.
 
I've said this before--possibly earlier in this thread--but if he thinks he's Picard and he's played by Patrick Stewart, that's good enough for me.

Whether he's "really" Picard or just an incredible simulation is potentially good story fodder for them to explore, but the latter possibility doesn't delegitimize the character for me.
 
I see. That is really something. I will have to check out the Turnabout Intruder and Distant Voices, Fireproof.

No worries. Could have been more clear. I see it like Kirk's essence being transferred from his body to Janice Lester's in "Turnabout Intruder" or Chakotay's spirit being separated in "Distant Voices" (I think). It's not the first time Trek has done this is my point.
 
That sounds good to me, The Old Mixer. I guess it makes sense in a while that Picard would become an android since Picard defended Data in the Measure of a Man ST:TNG episode.
I've said this before--possibly earlier in this thread--but if he thinks he's Picard and he's played by Patrick Stewart, that's good enough for me.

Whether he's "really" Picard or just an incredible simulation is potentially good story fodder for them to explore, but the latter possibility doesn't delegitimize the character for me.
 
I agree with you about this. Yes.
Exactly. They have established numerous times that consciousness transfer is possible. So if we've established it is possible in multiple different ways, to look at this one way and say "No, THAT one doesn't work," just seems to me to be complaining to complain.
 
That is interesting.

Consciousness transfer has happened numerous times in Trek. Janice Lester, Spock's Katra, glowy alien balls of criminals, etc. In my opinion, all we are quibbling about here is the type of receptacle used and whether that makes the consciousness "real." I went to a convention in Tulsa back when Voyager was on the air, and they had one of the writers on (for the life of me I don't remember which one) and he said they would get letters complaining if they put the wrong pips on someone's collar. So from that point forward in the Q&A whenever he would talk about the craft of storytelling, or the character's journey and someone would ask some absurdly nitpickey question about minor details, he would just look at them and say "Pips." That's what I think of every time someone complains about Picard being dead or a copy, I just imagine the writers room saying "Pips."
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top