I felt hope at times. More than I did with some of O'Brien's stories or the Doctor's. Both of those characters endured trauma with little comment. That's shocking and cruel.
That episode is suffused with love and self-sacrifice. Sad, yes. Dark, no. I'd even venture pointing us to light."I think I should leave my feral daughter back in the woods!"
I see no light it letting a child go back to the woods. That's horrifying to me on a level nigh imaginable as a parent. That's nightmare levels of dark for me.That episode is suffused with love and self-sacrifice. Sad, yes. Dark, no. I'd even venture pointing us to light.
The one where he is in imaginary jail ... well, even that has humanity and sacrifice in it.
Picard forum: Star Trek's too dark!!!
Lower Decks forum: Star Trek's too goofy!!!
Everything is always too something.
Why shouldn't characters in Trek be like 20th and 21st century humans? Humans are humans. The Federation is opposed to evolving them into something else.
Why shouldn't characters in Trek be like 20th and 21st century humans? Humans are humans. The Federation is opposed to evolving them into something else.
I but there are certain in universe rules. Star Trek now feels like any other dark themed sci fi show. There really isn’t any hope in that universe.
Of course there are dark moments IlAll of trek has has those but there was a hope always underlying it. I don’t feel that with this new trek. Humanity in kurtzman trek seems to close to 20th and 21st century humans. The style of storytelling being used is what has become popular since shows like Breaking Bad. The shades of grey story telling of the main characters.
Some thoughts:
1. The Romulan Cylon thing would have made the thing even more like Battlestar Galactica and also been something that the Federation would have figured out centuries ago I think. I mean, either they have organic brains or they don't.
2. I think that the biggest problem of the series is actually a very minor one in that it had too much backstory to get through and the show should have had 13 episodes rather than trying to ape Game of Thrones. The first 2 episodes should have been Picard w/ the refugees and Attack on Mars so we can see his fall from grace.
3. I think this is no more violent and dark a movie than Star Trek: Nemesis or the other action orientated Trek films. It also ends up in an optimistic upbeat note where everything is awesome.
Pike has broken this trend in disc so we’ll see if that changes things. But I think the writers of today think there are no pure characters and like to add shock value when a supposedly good character does something bad right out of the blue.
why not make them like 12 century humans?
My feelings as well.I'd much rather have emotionally and thematically honest Star Trek that depicts an optimistic, progressive future still winning out, over the TNG vision of a white-washed universe of emotionally vapid cardboard cut-outs that never have to face difficult or complex moral choices or their own imperfections for more than an episode or two.
Sounds accurate. And the New Humans mentioned in Gene Roddenberry's TMP novelization and seen in early-TNG went the way of New Coke.Why shouldn't characters in Trek be like 20th and 21st century humans? Humans are humans. The Federation is opposed to evolving them into something else.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.