• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Was pretty excited for this show.. but ultimately underwhelmed...

I felt hope at times. More than I did with some of O'Brien's stories or the Doctor's. Both of those characters endured trauma with little comment. That's shocking and cruel.
 
"I think I should leave my feral daughter back in the woods!"
That episode is suffused with love and self-sacrifice. Sad, yes. Dark, no. I'd even venture pointing us to light.

The one where he is in imaginary jail ... well, even that has humanity and sacrifice in it.
 
That episode is suffused with love and self-sacrifice. Sad, yes. Dark, no. I'd even venture pointing us to light.

The one where he is in imaginary jail ... well, even that has humanity and sacrifice in it.
I see no light it letting a child go back to the woods. That's horrifying to me on a level nigh imaginable as a parent. That's nightmare levels of dark for me.

The imaginary jail one is dark and grim and rather cruel in its presentation. Picard has humanity and sacrifice in it, and more so than that episode.
 
Why shouldn't characters in Trek be like 20th and 21st century humans? Humans are humans. The Federation is opposed to evolving them into something else.

This is exactly the opposite of what the show has consistently maintained. The problem is that the show is interested in ethical evolution and social evolution not physical.

Which irritates the transhumans among the fandom.
 
I but there are certain in universe rules. Star Trek now feels like any other dark themed sci fi show. There really isn’t any hope in that universe.

PIC Season 1 literally ends with every single social injustice over the past 15 years being overturned and Picard leading the Federation back into tolerance and enlightenment, so I don't know what the fuck it is you want out of this show.

Of course there are dark moments IlAll of trek has has those but there was a hope always underlying it. I don’t feel that with this new trek. Humanity in kurtzman trek seems to close to 20th and 21st century humans. The style of storytelling being used is what has become popular since shows like Breaking Bad. The shades of grey story telling of the main characters.

Oh! Oh, I get it. You want the writing to be bad. Sorry, dude, but life is not black-and-white, and TNG was emotionally dishonest when it portrayed humans as such. I'd much rather have emotionally and thematically honest Star Trek that depicts an optimistic, progressive future still winning out, over the TNG vision of a white-washed universe of emotionally vapid cardboard cut-outs that never have to face difficult or complex moral choices or their own imperfections for more than an episode or two.

Some thoughts:
1. The Romulan Cylon thing would have made the thing even more like Battlestar Galactica and also been something that the Federation would have figured out centuries ago I think. I mean, either they have organic brains or they don't.

I mean, think about it. We've never heard of Klingon androids, or Cardassian androids, or Ferengi androids, or what-have-you. Why would the Federation find the absence of Romulan androids particularly notable? As far as we know, the technology only exists within the Federation.

2. I think that the biggest problem of the series is actually a very minor one in that it had too much backstory to get through and the show should have had 13 episodes rather than trying to ape Game of Thrones. The first 2 episodes should have been Picard w/ the refugees and Attack on Mars so we can see his fall from grace.

I agree with this. S1 needed more time to breathe.

3. I think this is no more violent and dark a movie than Star Trek: Nemesis or the other action orientated Trek films. It also ends up in an optimistic upbeat note where everything is awesome.

Exactly.

Pike has broken this trend in disc so we’ll see if that changes things. But I think the writers of today think there are no pure characters and like to add shock value when a supposedly good character does something bad right out of the blue.

There are no pure people in real life. All of us are compromised by the institutions in which we live, and that reality ought to be reflected in our art when we're writing for adults. That doesn't mean you can't tell optimistic stories, or bright stories; but you shouldn't be pretending characters are pure when that status is inherently impossible.

why not make them like 12 century humans?

They are like 12th Century Humans. Because Humans are the same now as then, and will be the same in 400 years. Humans have not changed; their cultures have changed.
 
I'd much rather have emotionally and thematically honest Star Trek that depicts an optimistic, progressive future still winning out, over the TNG vision of a white-washed universe of emotionally vapid cardboard cut-outs that never have to face difficult or complex moral choices or their own imperfections for more than an episode or two.
My feelings as well.
 
Why shouldn't characters in Trek be like 20th and 21st century humans? Humans are humans. The Federation is opposed to evolving them into something else.
Sounds accurate. And the New Humans mentioned in Gene Roddenberry's TMP novelization and seen in early-TNG went the way of New Coke.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top