^ I'd like to visit Delta Kuppa Java. Must be an invigorating experience. Do you take the express(o) shuttle?
The inhabitants tend to be a bit nervous and jittery. But they sure know how to party all night.I'd like to visit Delta Kuppa Java. Must be an invigorating experience.
Look at it this way Timo, what if the intent of the Klingons was to invade further into Federation space? Kirk did refer to Organia as being "... located on the natural invasion routes." Now when America was going to invade France, it first sent lots and lots of troops to England, why? Because it was closer. If you want to invade a Federation planet, well you can blow it to pieces from orbit, but that doesn't get you a new planet for the Empire, you need boots on the ground.But there's no base on Organia. If the Klingons wanted one there, they'd have to bring it with them. Which again gets us back to "why bring it to Organia?". What does the planet have to offer that would be beneficial for a base?Starfleet and the Klingons aren't magical beings who can fix, refuel, rearm, and re-crew starships without a base
Just as Kirk promised to teach the Organians to increase their farm output, so could the Klingons, Kirk (in 'Tribbles) described them as very efficient, the extra food to be eaten by the assembling troops, grown by the Klingons new slaves.
It was certainly a priority for the Empire but not for the UFP, judging by how a fleet of ships was sent to establish the garrison, and how Starfleet only sent one defender.
.
...For a segue back to the John Gill issue, I wonder how the Ekosians hoped to get occupation troops to Zeon across the interplanetary gulf. A nuclear deterrent as a means of conquest I can understand. But we saw that threat deployed by means suspiciously similar to the old A-4 rocket. It's a giant leap for Ekoskind from that to troop carriers!
Timo Saloniemi
Just as Kirk promised to teach the Organians to increase their farm output, so could the Klingons, Kirk (in 'Tribbles) described them as very efficient, the extra food to be eaten by the assembling troops, grown by the Klingons new slaves.
Yeah but that was to sell the benefits of an alliance with the federation. The Klingons are less likely to use that and more likely to use the "do what I say or I shoot you with this disruptor" method.
It was certainly a priority for the Empire but not for the UFP, judging by how a fleet of ships was sent to establish the garrison, and how Starfleet only sent one defender.
That's because the federation are all "its your planet you can do whatever you want with it" while the Klingons are "We are taking your planet and shooting anyone who doesn't like it with disruptors".
Eminiar had no relations with the Federation, no John Gill to blame for messing things up. The Emenians got to where they were entirely on their own. They were not under outside control. The computers did not control their actions, they followed the results presented willingly. And yet Kirk, and by extension the Federation, took it upon themselves to totally disrupt their civilization.
You're confusing ships with lives:I'm also curious as to when Ambassador Fox early in the episode talks about IIRC "thousands of ships lost, that wouldn't have been lost if we had an alliance with Eminar VII" or something to that effect.
Now, that strongly suggests to me Eminar VII has been destroying large numbers of ships transiting that region
FOX: Captain, in the past twenty years, thousands of lives have been lost in this quadrant. Lives that could have been saved if the Federation had a treaty port here. We mean to have that port and I'm here to get it.
You're confusing ships with lives:I'm also curious as to when Ambassador Fox early in the episode talks about IIRC "thousands of ships lost, that wouldn't have been lost if we had an alliance with Eminar VII" or something to that effect.
Now, that strongly suggests to me Eminar VII has been destroying large numbers of ships transiting that region
FOX: Captain, in the past twenty years, thousands of lives have been lost in this quadrant. Lives that could have been saved if the Federation had a treaty port here. We mean to have that port and I'm here to get it.
But, is there any indication Eminiar VII destroyed ships? Isn't it also possible, that there were emergencies on nearby outputs that could've been answered without loss of life, or at least minimal loss of life had they had that port close by, rather than having to travel from another port for an additional 2 weeks or whatever? Or maybe there's Pirates or Raiders in the neighborhood preying on Outposts in the area, that wouldn't be doing so, if The Federation had a closer port of call to respond from?You're confusing ships with lives:I'm also curious as to when Ambassador Fox early in the episode talks about IIRC "thousands of ships lost, that wouldn't have been lost if we had an alliance with Eminar VII" or something to that effect.
Now, that strongly suggests to me Eminar VII has been destroying large numbers of ships transiting that region
FOX: Captain, in the past twenty years, thousands of lives have been lost in this quadrant. Lives that could have been saved if the Federation had a treaty port here. We mean to have that port and I'm here to get it.
Thanks.
Thousands of lives then.
But again, say 2,000 people killed because the Federation did not have a treaty port at Eminar VII.
Assume about 200 people per ship that's 10 ships destroyed or lost in some way.
Again, were the Eminarans destroying them? It certainly seems like an accident prone place if not.
But, is there any indication Eminiar VII destroyed ships? Isn't it also possible, that there were emergencies on nearby outputs that could've been answered without loss of life, or at least minimal loss of life had they had that port close by, rather than having to travel from another port for an additional 2 weeks or whatever? Or maybe there's Pirates or Raiders in the neighborhood preying on Outposts in the area, that wouldn't be doing so, if The Federation had a closer port of call to respond from?You're confusing ships with lives:
Thanks.
Thousands of lives then.
But again, say 2,000 people killed because the Federation did not have a treaty port at Eminar VII.
Assume about 200 people per ship that's 10 ships destroyed or lost in some way.
Again, were the Eminarans destroying them? It certainly seems like an accident prone place if not.
Just as Kirk promised to teach the Organians to increase their farm output, so could the Klingons, Kirk (in 'Tribbles) described them as very efficient, the extra food to be eaten by the assembling troops, grown by the Klingons new slaves.
Yeah but that was to sell the benefits of an alliance with the federation. The Klingons are less likely to use that and more likely to use the "do what I say or I shoot you with this disruptor" method.
It was certainly a priority for the Empire but not for the UFP, judging by how a fleet of ships was sent to establish the garrison, and how Starfleet only sent one defender.
That's because the federation are all "its your planet you can do whatever you want with it" while the Klingons are "We are taking your planet and shooting anyone who doesn't like it with disruptors".
Not so. In the opening of the episode Kirk said "We are to proceed to Organia and take whatever steps are necessary to prevent the Klingons from using it as a base. ". As war was not yet declared what would prevent the Organians from welcoming the Klingons? Is it not their planet? Can they not permit the Klingons to build a base if they like?
Also, "whatever steps are necessary" would seem to allow the use of General Order 24 if Kirk deemed it necessary.
He's threatened to do so under conditions where the Federation was not at war. (A Taste of Armageddon).
Then again we don't know how much Fox could have been exceeding his authority or pushing things beyond a point another person might not have dared. Fox didn't soften until his own life had been directly threatened.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.