Star Trek: Enterprise presented a variety of examples of behavior which is questionable at best. Perhaps the finest example of this is when Archer and Phlox conspired against a species suffering from a genetic disease, dooming them to extinction. It wasn't because the species was "bad" or "threatening" in some way. In fact, the species was nothing but amicable, living in harmony with a second, less advanced species. Humanity had long ago killed off its Neanderthal brethren on Earth, but this species chose to coexist peacefully with it's less developed neighbor. That was apparently unacceptable to Star Fleet's best. Instead of providing the suffering and dying species with the cure they so desperately needed, Archer and Phlox chose to withhold it. They chose to allow that species to die so that the other species might someday rise up and take their place. Might.
In the Enterprise season finale, it was revealed that the episode, and perhaps entire season itself, had only been a recreation of events. Riker had been watching a hologram all along. History has a tendency to be interpreted in a variety of ways. One historian's hero is another's villain. Someone once said, "history is written by the victors." While Archer and Phlox appeared to commit genocide, supported by very dubious reasons, Riker's hologram calls into question whether or not that event actually took place in the way shown to us. If Enterprise was a revisionist interpretation of history, it may be that what took place that day was actually much more sinister, or much less.
Perhaps Phlox never actually found a cure, and the paranoid historical records left by the extinct species had blamed the Federation, claiming Archer and Phlox secretly did have the ability to save them. Perhaps 24th century conspiracy theorists believe the Enterprise did provide them a "cure," but that cure proved to be deadly, and the incident was subsequently covered-up by Star Fleet. Perhaps that cure was very intentionally deadly - the 22nd Century version of smallpox infected blankets. After all, whose to say Archer's USS Enterprise wasn't actually more like Forrest's ISS Enterprise?
Did it all really happen as we were shown, or does the Riker hologram twist put everything into question? Perhaps more interestingly: could Riker have been a crazy conspiracy theorist?
He was once institutionalized in an insane asylum, wasn't he?
In the Enterprise season finale, it was revealed that the episode, and perhaps entire season itself, had only been a recreation of events. Riker had been watching a hologram all along. History has a tendency to be interpreted in a variety of ways. One historian's hero is another's villain. Someone once said, "history is written by the victors." While Archer and Phlox appeared to commit genocide, supported by very dubious reasons, Riker's hologram calls into question whether or not that event actually took place in the way shown to us. If Enterprise was a revisionist interpretation of history, it may be that what took place that day was actually much more sinister, or much less.
Perhaps Phlox never actually found a cure, and the paranoid historical records left by the extinct species had blamed the Federation, claiming Archer and Phlox secretly did have the ability to save them. Perhaps 24th century conspiracy theorists believe the Enterprise did provide them a "cure," but that cure proved to be deadly, and the incident was subsequently covered-up by Star Fleet. Perhaps that cure was very intentionally deadly - the 22nd Century version of smallpox infected blankets. After all, whose to say Archer's USS Enterprise wasn't actually more like Forrest's ISS Enterprise?
Did it all really happen as we were shown, or does the Riker hologram twist put everything into question? Perhaps more interestingly: could Riker have been a crazy conspiracy theorist?

He was once institutionalized in an insane asylum, wasn't he?
Last edited: