• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Was Cochrane a Roddenberry stand-in?

jackoverfull

Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
I was thinking about how the First Contact Zephram Cochrane resembles Gene Roddenberry, as someone that ends up causing something for all the wrong reasons and whose future generations worship ignoring all his flaws and original motivations. And also as someone that perhaps, later in life, also tried to live up to that worship, trying (maybe often failing) to follow those ideals he was associated with.

What do you think? Also keep in mind that people such as Rick Batman had worked with Roddenberry and knew him personally, so there might have been a bit of intentionality in this parallel.
 
"You wanna know what my vision is? Dollar signs! Money! I didn't build this ship to usher in a new era for humanity. You think I wanna go to the stars? I don't even like to fly. I take trains. I built this ship so that I could retire to some tropical island filled with naked women. That's Zefram Cochrane. That's his vision."

It sure sounds like it.
 
I was thinking about how the First Contact Zephram Cochrane resembles Gene Roddenberry, as someone that ends up causing something for all the wrong reasons and whose future generations worship ignoring all his flaws and original motivations. And also as someone that perhaps, later in life, also tried to live up to that worship, trying (maybe often failing) to follow those ideals he was associated with.

I'd never thought about it before, but reading this and @Ray Hardgrit 's excellent point, I'm willing to more than speculate. Quite possibly you're right, yes!
 
I concur about the First Contact Cochrane. The one way I see that the Metamorphosis Cochrane might also be a Roddenberry analog is the aspect of alien interspecies sex, which I'm sure would have appealed to him.
 
Yes. I don't think the writers of FC have confirmed whether this was intentional. But in the 2009 audio commentary, trekmovie.com editor Anthony Pascale made this comparison between Cochrane and Roddenberry:
Anthony Pascale said:
"I always felt that the way they treated Cochrane is kind of like Roddenberry. Roddenberry's revered as this god-like visionary, but Gene Roddenberry was a Human being with flaws, you know, but that doesn't mean he isn't also a great man and a great visionary.

Kor
 
"You wanna know what my vision is? Dollar signs! Money! I didn't build this ship to usher in a new era for humanity. You think I wanna go to the stars? I don't even like to fly. I take trains. I built this ship so that I could retire to some tropical island filled with naked women. That's Zefram Cochrane. That's his vision."

It sure sounds like it.
Probably the only real contribution to the TNG movies Rick Berman did for the script.
 
Ron Moore wouldn't have been able to acknowledge Zephram Cochrane was based on Gene Roddenberry during the '90s. So if he denied it then, it would be understandable. If he denied it after he left Star Trek, that's something else. I think Ron Moore is one of the best Star Trek writers from the Berman Era and he's spot-on about almost everything. So I'm a huge fan of his. But I have to call a spade a spade. If he says Zephram Cochrane wasn't based on Gene Roddenberry, he's lying through his teeth.
 
Last edited:
"You wanna know what my vision is? Dollar signs! Money! I didn't build this ship to usher in a new era for humanity. You think I wanna go to the stars? I don't even like to fly. I take trains. I built this ship so that I could retire to some tropical island filled with naked women. That's Zefram Cochrane. That's his vision."

It sure sounds like it.

Yup and this is the exact thing I tend to point out when people keep taking about "Gene's vision" this and that. I don't care if a person gets something inspiring out of the show, that's amazing and the true legacy of Star Trek. But elevating Gene's intention beyond making a living as a television series producer is misguided. Gene's "vision" was born when he realized nobody was buying his warmed over Star Trek Lite concepts and weird pilot movies.
 
The character of Cochrane in TOS and the one in the movie is SO different, it must have been intentional to have him be a representation of Roddenberry. Wish they had renamed the character.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top