• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Was a fifth gas giant ejected from the solar system?

I think it's pretty difficult to explain such a massive axial tilt unless Uranus collided with a planet of a comparable size.

Not really.
Everyone believes that the titl was caused by a collision but the moons are also tilted.

http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/24477/

However I think this is probably a natural effect of distance countering the grip of gravity.. Planets roll around any way. They say that the Moon stablizes Earth's tilt otherwise we'd be on our side too at times... (I've never understood that.)

Object Axial tilt (°) Axial tilt (radians) Sun 7.25 0.1265 Mercury 0.0352 0.000614 Venus 177.4 3.096 Earth 23.44 0.4091 Moon 6.688† 0.1167 Mars 25.19 0.4396 Ceres ~4 ~0.07 Pallas ~60 ~1 Jupiter 3.13 0.0546 Saturn 26.73 0.4665 Uranus 97.77 1.7064 Neptune 28.32 0.4943 Pluto 119.61 2.0876


Mecury is tidally locked.
Venus is upside down and rotating in the wrong direction
Earth is anchored to Luna
Mars Earth like tilt is a "fluke" as it's spin has been rolling for millions of years
Jupiter maybe anchoring for the sun


From there the tilt get more extreme the further you go so I guess having an anchor is a big deal.
 
What do you mean Mercury tidally locked?

It rotates three times for every two revolutions around the Sun thus failing to keep the same side to the sun.

[i get people saying that it is tidally locked all the time and that is not accurate]
 
What do you mean Mercury tidally locked?

It rotates three times for every two revolutions around the Sun thus failing to keep the same side to the sun.

[i get people saying that it is tidally locked all the time and that is not accurate]

It used to be thought that Mercury was tidally locked before radar measurements were made of its rotation in the 1960s. People are either reading very old textbooks or they don't keep up to date. Pesky scientific progress.
 
What do you mean Mercury tidally locked?

It rotates three times for every two revolutions around the Sun thus failing to keep the same side to the sun.

[i get people saying that it is tidally locked all the time and that is not accurate]


It's what I've read.
But nice to know the facts.
 
Last edited:
The Nice model has Uranus and Neptune forming between Jupiter and Saturn so the 5th gas giant would have likely formed in that region.
 
Question. In interstellar space, would a gas giant freeze? Would it have a solid surface?

Assuming it's a gas giant, it would probably generate its own heat for many billions of years by gravitational contraction and that would probably suffice to maintain a gaseous envelope with an underlying layer of liquid hydrogen and helium and beneath that a graduation to fluid metallic hydrogen. If the temperature did fall to 2.7K (the temperature of the background radiation in our epoch), it would have a liquid hydrogen and helium surface.
 
Question. In interstellar space, would a gas giant freeze? Would it have a solid surface?

Gas giants get a large amount of their heat from inside due to huge pressures and leftover formation heat. The material in the atmosphere could stay not solid for a long time!

I think that is one of the mechanisms that may keep the surface non solid.

*edit, Asbo Zaprudder answered it best!
 
I think this scientist is goofy. Unless you know the original mass of the solar system, how can you tell if it's missing some?

Nice try.
 
I think this scientist is goofy. Unless you know the original mass of the solar system, how can you tell if it's missing some?

Nice try.

Don't try so hard to immediately dismiss what you don't understand.
 
I wonder how far the presumptive ejected planet could have gotten. Nice to use it as a way-station for the far future...
 
I wonder how far the presumptive ejected planet could have gotten. Nice to use it as a way-station for the far future...

Multiplying a random number close to Uranus' orbital velocity to 3 billion years yields 70000 light years.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=7+km/s+*+3+billion+years+in+light+years

I have absolutely no idea how would an ejection velocity compare to the orbital velocity, so YMMV. That's how far Uranus would go in 3 billion years if you deleted the Sun.
 
I have absolutely no idea how would an ejection velocity compare to the orbital velocity, so YMMV.

If I recall correctly, escape velocity is root 2 (~1.4142) times orbital velocity, so for Uranus 1.4142 * 6.81 km/s or 9.63 km/s. Of course, the velocity would decrease as the planet climbed out of the Sun's gravity well. Voyager 1 is currently travelling at 17.06 km/s relative to the Sun.
 
I wonder how far the presumptive ejected planet could have gotten. Nice to use it as a way-station for the far future...

Multiplying a random number close to Uranus' orbital velocity to 3 billion years yields 70000 light years.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=7+km/s+*+3+billion+years+in+light+years

I have absolutely no idea how would an ejection velocity compare to the orbital velocity, so YMMV. That's how far Uranus would go in 3 billion years if you deleted the Sun.

Whoa. 70k ly. The cosmos is probably teaming with these things. Wonder how often encounters occur between these rogue worlds and other systems.

Frightening really.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top