Well my experience with the movie is totally different, I still find it immensely interesting and rewatchable, and the spectacle bits are the least of the reasons for it (though I enjoy those bits as well).
I just can't see the argument for BvS as emblematic of Hollywood. If anything, modern Hollywood is pushing for simple, straightforward stories, where everything is literal, properly explained and hermetically logical and that's considered "good." But BvS doesn't fail at doing that, it doesn't even attempt to do that, instead it draws on the narrative tradition of classical theater, it eschews simple straightforwardness for the exploration of themes and ideas, it ignores almost everything in the rulebook for appealing to mass audiences(people even complained there wasn't enough action in it when it came out), hence why I see it as very un-Hollywodish. (I'd take Justice League as a very good example of what I consider Hollywooding it up.)
Also, people love to dismiss Snyder as a simpleton music video director who can only do pretty pictures(as if anyone can do that), but his background is in art history and it absolutely shows in his work. His imagery and attention to detail speak volumes to me, moreso than any excessive use of words could, and I reject the notion that there's something wrong with that and the "proper" way to do thing is to literally explain stuff with more words.