The seven are the main cast, when compared with the likes of Paskey and Blackburn.
So you meant to say nine not seven then, including Majel Barrett and Grace Lee Whitney...
Of course, Shatner would not have felt any sense of competition for screen time with Paskey or Blackburn, so he may have treated them differently. We weren't there, so we'll never know how it really was for the main cast.
the same type of recorded converstation with Nichols and it was only AFTER he put the recording equioment away, and was preparing to leave , she said, "Don't you want to hear why we all hate you?"
She was answering the questions he asked her. Nichelle's point was that Shatner had not asked the deeper questions. So she told him. Nothing cowardly about that. As in the Koenig interview linked above, Shatner was supposedly oblivious.Sorry, but to me that shows how petty these two of the 'fab 4' are. I mean come on - if you DO feel that way, have the guts to say it to the man's face, or as part of the interview - don't wait umntil after the interview to bring it up.
Have you read all the autobiographies? I have. Have you heard them speak at conventions? I have.But, I'll be honest and say that if what Shatner related about his experiences interviewing Nichelle Nichols and George Takei are true; I've lost a lot of respect for them.
Again, you've got it wrong. Read Shatner's book. And Nichelle's book. She didn't hold back. She told him. On tape. He'd turned it off early, when he thought he had the full story, but he only had the santized version she'd told ad infinitum at conventions. She made him get more story.At leat have the guuts to be up front if you agree to talk with the person you hate about your experiences, don't pu on a false face, and ambush him again after the interview.
How is Doohan "honest" and Takei not? They both have criticised Shatner at conventions, but they were answering questions put to them. "What was it like working with Shatner?" You wanted them to lie?And if it's too painful to talk about, why agree to supposedly talk directly with the perpetrator of your anguish for a book at all? At least James Doohan was honest per se, as he refused to speak with Shatner regarding the subject.
The actors know it wasn't an ensemble cast. It didn't become an ensemble until the conventions in the 70s, when the "gang of four" were doing conventions together... to put bread on their tables. Shatner missed all that, too.Again, it was the 1960ies and Shatner WAS the star of the show. 'Ensemble casts' were rare
What score? That royalty payments ran out after one play and two repeats?they WERE in the business before Star Trek, so they knew the score.
Exactly. And being asked the same questions over and over and over.I don't think it was until they started doing Star Trek Conventions that they started to look back on the experience differently.
Then you haven't been to enough conventions, because George is just as likely to talk about losing his aunt and baby cousin in Hiroshima, being put in an internment camp even though he was a US resident, running for local government during TAS, wishing he could get stage work when no one would cast an Asian American in any role other than an Asian, his participation in fun runs around the world, being on the Los Angeles Rapid Transit Committee, running with the Olympic Flame before the 1984 Olympics, and working with John Wayne. And, these days, he'll also include stories of being a gay man in an era/family where it was not acceptable.you NEVER hear him talk about that at Conventions - he always says, "I KNEW Star Trek was 'something special'..." and leaves out "While I was trying to launch my film career with a major John Wayne picture..."![]()
^ Agreed. That was an incredible interview last night. Very intense! Shatner did seem truly sorry for what others perceived as insult. The conversation about Takei's wedding was interesting. Walter seemed like he felt George's invitation was more of a show than anything else. Kudos to both the Shat AND Walter for a fascinating yet difficult interview.
Actually I took his reaction at first to be that he felt Shatner was ridiculing or demeaning them all somehow, as if all the three of them have anymore is their silly little Star Trek friendship. The comment about it all being a "show" seemed like more of a deflection to me.
But while there's no doubt Shatner can be a obnoxious blowhard, it also seemed pretty clear to me that Walter is more than a tad over-sensitive. To be in a business like that, you probably need to have a much thicker skin than he has.
I wonder if any of them will ever reach a stage were what happened on a TV show 45 years ago between them and Shatner wont matter anymore...its certainly a hell of a long time to hold a grudge,
A sign of their professionalism, and yet Shatner fans say it was "so unprofessional" of them to complain about him in humorous convention anecdotes. Most of their stories are told in jest, not malice, and the anger really only began to show when they were all writing autobiographies.yet they continued to work with they guy on a load of ST movies after it all.
Paraphrasing here: "Look, even if everything you said is true, the fact remains that we didn't say anything to him about it then, so we really don't have any room to go on about it now, after all these years."
I still wonder whether they do it because they really have nurtured a life-long hatred of Shatner or just because they think the fans eat it up.Paraphrasing here: "Look, even if everything you said is true, the fact remains that we didn't say anything to him about it then, so we really don't have any room to go on about it now, after all these years."
I still wonder whether they do it because they really have nurtured a life-long hatred of Shatner or just because they think the fans eat it up.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.