This may have been visited before, but here goes:
While the Falcon is more manueverable(?), Voyager has better firepower.
Voyager all the way!![]()
If there was sufficient prep time...Batman!
My money's on Lone Star and Barf in the Winnebago.
My money's on Lone Star and Barf in the Winnebago.
Motor homes don't count. Sorry, just lack of gas stations in interstellar space.![]()
The Voyager can manuver and fire at warp speeds. The Falcon cannot. It is doubtful that the Falcon's weapons would even be able to penetrate federation shielding even if it was given a chance to fire.
I don't think the Falcon's weapons could penetrate the hull.
Please, the Falcon made the Kessel Run is less than 12 parsecs!!!!The Voyager can manuver and fire at warp speeds. The Falcon cannot. It is doubtful that the Falcon's weapons would even be able to penetrate federation shielding even if it was given a chance to fire.
But they have the Schwartz on their side!
I don't think the Falcon's weapons could penetrate the hull.
The Falcon has turboblaster batteries and concussion torpedo capacity, plus decent shields that could withstand phaser fire from the Voyager if it's lucky (the same also applies to the weapons penetrating the Voyager's shields.) It has in it's favor FTL engines that can travel halfway across the galaxy in two hours (it would take the Voyager 80 years to do so.) But that's it.
The larger size of Voyager & the power of its weapons would mean curtains for the Falcon in any fight, unless Solo knew how and where to shoot his blasters and torpedoes.
I don't think the Falcon's weapons could penetrate the hull.
I don't think the Falcon's weapons could penetrate the hull.
Exactly. The Falcon, like most SW ships, is armed with lasers. And lasers are not a threat to Starfleet vessels.
Also: The Falcon does not, that I'm aware of, have shields.
"Endgame" Voyager could take out the Death Star by herself.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.