Re: the blow-ups over Janeway's death over in the 'Lit forum... I posted in a couple of them (there were like... five different ones over the course of a few years, it was kind of insane.

). I tried to keep a level head; I hope I succeeded. But, in all fairness, in the threads I read through and/or participated in, there were level-headed, reasonable people, and irrational, needlessly snippy, condescending people on BOTH sides of the issue. ("Sides" in this case being defined very broadly as simply "Ok with the fact that Janeway died" and "Not ok with it." The complexities of
how she died and how good/bad BD was overall, etc etc. I'm not including at the moment when defining the "sides" that debated in those threads). Really, both sides seemed to have both stripes in equal numbers. Yes, there were people who were significantly less than polite to Janeway fans, but there were also people insulting the authors who tried to defend the decision and getting on people who were just
ok with it pretty harshly. Following a long post I made in one such thread, someone responded by subtly implying with that I must have some kind of fascination with death if I'm defending the decision to kill a main show character.
Personally, I occupy the middle ground. I'm obviously not a "Janeway fan", though I did like the character at times (and would have liked her a lot
more if the writing had been different; certainly my problems with her have nothing to do with either the concept of the character, nor the performance by Mulgrew). I'm ok with the death, and with main character death in general, as long as it is both not overdone, and always handled with care... and the latter wasn't really the case here, frankly. While I still don't think there's much merit to the conspiracy theory, giving the assignment to PAD was a stupid thing to do.
BD - As an OTT story where the bulk of it is probably best forgotten, it's not bad. Nobody's actually explained -how- Janeway was OOC (I'd argue that is more true for some of the Enterprise crew in any case), and since we're not clear on the behind-the-scenes, I'm not going to assign blame except that -if- PAD had issues with Janeway then assigning this story to him was probably a questionable decision. But hey, it's nowhere near the worst Trek book ever (if you think it is I suggest reading more of the standalone early TNG stories), and as with Trek '09 at least it wasn't afraid to shake up the status quo. Making an issue of the fact that it says TNG on the cover is, -to me-, a bit silly
Yeah, I don't know for certain myself on PAD disliking Janeway. Come to think of it, is
anyone sure? Did it ever move past a rumor?
And no, definitely not the worst Trek book ever. As you said, those early standalone TNG books........

And not even my least favorite PAD book, personally. I may not think BD is very good, but at least I was able to
finish it.
I'm reading the threads froot posted and I'm finding it pretty hard to choke down Beyer's reasoning of her being completely in favor of Janeway's death. Apparently this opened up loads of possible storylines with the rest of the VOY crew and lots of great new characters could be written.
As I said, I haven't read any actual VOY books, so I can't comment
too directly on the stories themselves... but as a writer (well, aspiring, anyway

), I tend to believe her. Nothing more than my instinct, I suppose, but I've made that decision myself in my own stories; killing a main, one you might even
like, is tough, but sometimes, you cannot ignore the story ideas that are springing up around it.
And as to great new characters.. as I've said before I do like Eden BUT.. do readers actually clamor for new characters? Do they seek out treklit and flip through a book getting all excited to see NEW characters? I highly doubt it.
*raises hand*

Ok, full disclosure: I didn't
start out reading the DS9R or the pre-destiny stuff thinking "Let's see what awesome new characters there are in here!" It's as you said, to find out what was happening after the shows (and - due to when I started reading all these, which was just a couple years ago, it was also to find out what this "Destiny" thing was all about; I started reading so I could get the backstory before reading Destiny itself once my interest had been piqued). But, that said, if you ask me
now, looking back on it... in all honesty, I care about Prynn Tenmei, Miranda Kadohata, Shar, and others I'm simply forgetting about at the moment just as much as I do anyone from the shows.
To be fair, though, there are also original characters I'm very "meh" on.
Titan has left me pretty disinterested (which is
weird! A new class of deep-space explorer captained by one of my favorite TNG characters with a spectacularly diverse crew. That's a recipe for awesome, but somehow...

), and part of that is because I find the originals on the ship to be rather up and down. Some of them are interesting, but a lot of them are pretty boring IMO. And there's a sense sometimes, too, with that series, that with
so many characters showing up (and some of them just feel like "Titan is supposed to be
diverse! We need to show more races! Quick, add another character!"), a lot of them are just THERE.
Leybenzon just drove me up the wall...I don't know what the writers were trying to do with him, but unless the answer is "annoy us" they failed. I did pick up inklings of something going on with him and Kadohata though. If written well that might have been a good read.
Ugh, me too. The ending of "Greater than the Sum"... well, let's just say I wasn't exactly heartbroken.
Much like the movie trilogy, I think one issue is that the pre-Destiny books introduced these characters, but by the time Destiny kicks in most of them have already become moot points. I'm willing to be patient and give characters a few books to see whether they evolve (consider if we judged all Trek characters based on their Season 1 depictions), but when they're taken out of the field of play it's almost unfair to them.
Granted, I actually haven't read THAT many of the "modern" Trek books outside the DS9 relaunch, but I don't really agree with this. The original characters on
Aventine and
Enterprise felt well-used during Destiny, and also during GTtS in the
Enterprise' case. As FOR the DS9 R... well, they didn't really show up much for Destiny outside of Bowers (who I do like).
I haven't read post-Destiny yet (I backtracked to DS9 and am on Warpath currently), but I don't think the post-Destiny novels are supposed to be big crossovers beyond maybe a couple of characters doing so in a way that makes sense based on the stories?
Correct, at least as far as "Losing the Peace" and "A Singular Destiny" are concerned. Both are highly recommended, as well. Haven't read any of the Typhon Pact books yet.
I've never read a Voyager novel, so unfortunately I'm not in a position to comment on essentially anything going on in that corner of the Trek universe.
Same here.
Another day, another needlessly huge post...
