• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Voyager & Christianity/Religion

I would like to believe that even folks that believe in creation are aware of the concept of evolution. Trek isn't enforcing any believe but it shouldn't shy away from letting the audience know there are choices.
Nicely said.
Thank you.


I think one of the great qualities of all Trek in general is that it's greatly entertaining but can be used as an educational tool on certain topics as well.
 
Well, watching the show has at times made me exclaim Jeezus frakking Xrist, so maybe we're onto something here...
 
Let's see some IDIC in action.

Hear hear. While I am not personally religious, we're all trying to make our way in this world. I certainly don't have all the answers, so I don't begrudge anyone who turns to religion for some explanation of their spiritual life... just so long as they don't try and take me with them.
 
^ Does it? Really? In what respect? Acknowledging that not all Christians believe in a literal interpretation of Genesis, of course.

But, regardless, who is arguing that life began in outer space?
 
I was just curious if Christian beliefs are relevant in the Trek universe.
Trek is interesting because it's primary message is one of tolerance (IDIC), meaning that no Starfleet person would ever dismiss a person's beliefs out of hand- the best example I can think of this is when Sisko rebukes Jake for calling the Bajoran beliefs 'stupid'.

When a "belief" contradicts known reality, it is wrong and irrational. That is not an opinion.

Evolution is fact. Tolerance for other people's religious or political views do not even enter into the equation. Facts are facts - regardless of whether anyone likes it or not.

I'm not going to touch on the issue of whether or not Christianity is reconcilable with the fact of evolution. That's for Christians to decide. Voyager's acknowledgment of the fact of evolution should not be construed as a judgment of truth - either of Christianity or Chakote's tree people. That's as true today as it is in the 24th century.

Evolution is fact. It's up to a believer of any particular religion to decide if belief in that religion is reconcilable with the fact of evolution. Denial of the fact of evolution is as irrational as denial of the fact of a spherical Earth orbiting around the sun. Tolerance has nothing to do with it. Facts are facts.
 
Faith trumps facts.

Apparently because the fossil records are incomplete, it can be argued that Evolution is an incomplete supposition which is utterly inabsolute and completely nonbinding as if it's only a matter of time until we find fossils of Angels.

I once, more than once in a bar, said that the whole bablyon 5 Vorlon Shadows Mythology was some odd little middle eastern pantheon. I almost even got a convert once.

Some people will tie their faith to anything.

O.

Officially in the last census I filled out, I was one of those idiots who slotted in "jedi" as his religion. Does that mean that anyone here who hammers jaja binks and the raw mulch which is the rest of the prequel trilogy is intolerant of my religion?

I wanted 9 years on Buffy for them to say that Jesus was a vampire.

No balls.

Man from Earth showed the tac that they might was taken in requiem for Methuselah.

How sad.
 
Evolution is fact. Tolerance for other people's religious or political views do not even enter into the equation. Facts are facts - regardless of whether anyone likes it or not.
One of the most basic principles of science is the acknowledgment that there is always the possibility that what we accept as true, no matter how much evidence their is or how well proven it seems to be, could be mistaken. Dealing with 100% absolutes is not scientific.
 
Evolution is fact. Tolerance for other people's religious or political views do not even enter into the equation. Facts are facts - regardless of whether anyone likes it or not.
One of the most basic principles of science is the acknowledgment that there is always the possibility that what we accept as true, no matter how much evidence their is or how well proven it seems to be, could be mistaken. Dealing with 100% absolutes is not scientific.

That is correct. Technically, science never proves anything; it only disproves theories. But when a theory withstands thousands of attempts to disprove it, when every known fact only makes sense if it is true, one gains quite a bit of confidence in it. That is especially true when all competing "theories" are easily shot down.

Earth is more than 4 billion years old. The universe is more than 13 billion years old. Dinosaurs walked the planet more than 65 million years before the first Humans appeared. Denying these things at this point is akin to denying that 1 + 1 = 2.
 
So StarryEyed, religion is the same as being stripped naked and tortured by a Cardassian until you're repurposed into thinking a lie is the truth?

Have we mentioned the next emanation where religion turned out to be right and harry's certainty in science proved to be bollocks?
 
The concept of "faith" in general is explored in eps. like "Sacred Ground" & in ep. where Neelix dies.(I'm drawing a blank on the title.)

Mortal Coil.

The whole episode could have been avoided if Seven of Nine had told Neelix that Talaxian Souls don't cross over into the afterlife until 72 hours after death, which coincidentally is the amount of time after which cellular necrosis is irreversible for Borg nanoprobes.
 
So StarryEyed, religion is the same as being stripped naked and tortured by a Cardassian until you're repurposed into thinking a lie is the truth?

Have we mentioned the next emanation where religion turned out to be right and harry's certainty in science proved to be bollocks?

I never equated all religion with Cardassian torture chambers although it can be like that. Google "Spanish Inquisition" and be prepared to cry.

"Emanations", besides being a crap episode, is fiction. But it wouldn't change anything even if it were real. Of course a religion may be correct. If may stand up to scientific scrutiny and earn credibility. It may make claims which are outside of scientific scrutiny and are therefor untestable. It may make claims which ARE testable in the realm of science and may be proven false - like the literal interpretation of the book of Genesis in the Bible.

Humans do not originate from an original pair. We do have animal ancestors. We have been around far longer than 10,000 years. There was no world-wide flood.
 
But there is going to be a world wide flood. That Vice Prez from olden times seyz so. Maybe the bible is told out of order and backwards to protect the innocent and culpable yet dim?
 
But there is going to be a world wide flood. That Vice Prez from olden times seyz so. Maybe the bible is told out of order and backwards to protect the innocent and culpable yet dim?

Devil's advocate?

I can think of no worse insult than being inferred to as one of Keanu Reeves worst movies!

SWEET NOVEMBER!

;)

By the way? How am i expected to google something I can't expect?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top