But... well, it might not occur to you that I wasn't looking for your sympathy, but rather explaining why I sympathize with other people who were harmed by the lockdown... no no no. I have to be EVIL and PATHETIC and SELFISH and HORRIBLE and ROTTEN because you can't handle that you don't have the market cornered on virtue, that the situation might have been a little more complex than you thought.
From what I've seen, advocates of restrictive public health measures have frequently acknowledged the complexity and the undesirable consequences of social isolation during the pandemic. The CDC has published a number of articles about it, for instance. The most simplistic takes, OTOH, are those that simply amount to "The government's not going to tell me what to do!"
The way you have framed it, the impact of the disease is minimized, as if life would have proceeded more or less normally without lockdowns. There is no reason to believe that. What has been shown to happen is that if the infection rate gets bad enough, people in an area will self-isolate even without government intervention, and, historically, not necessarily in an orderly way. And while I have great sympathy for those whose personal difficulties and losses were exacerbated by pandemic restrictions (and I am one of them), I also have great sympathy for the medical personnel, care providers, first responders and other essential workers who had to roll the dice every day they went to work in areas where infection rates were rampant. What about their stress levels and peace of mind and mental health, while they were doing their jobs to help the rest of us?
Like it or not, social restrictions were one of the most effective tools to slow the spread in the early months of the pandemic. Sometimes there are no easy answers, you just have to do your best and get through it. Almost universally, those who implemented restrictions were doing the best they could with the information and experience they had.
"Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions"
Nature Human Behavior
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-020-01009-0