It won't be me. Only a copy.
It could be both or neither. Up to you.
RAMA
Since actual consciousness is, as far as we know, tied to the human body, how could uploading be anything other than a copy?
It won't be me. Only a copy.
It could be both or neither. Up to you.
RAMA
It won't be me. Only a copy.
It could be both or neither. Up to you.
RAMA
Since actual consciousness is, as far as we know, tied to the human body, how could uploading be anything other than a copy?
It could be both or neither. Up to you.
RAMA
Since actual consciousness is, as far as we know, tied to the human body, how could uploading be anything other than a copy?
No one has bothered answering that point yet.
It won't be me. Only a copy.
It could be both or neither. Up to you.
RAMA
OoBE's are not the mind literally leaving the body, at least one study has had those who claim to have them in a room with objects placed on top of high furniture without being told beforehand it was there, came "back again" and where clueless still to those items having claimed they "saw everything from above".
So...yeah, lucid dreaming.
And there are a dozen reasons why I would want to have a copy of myself in a supercomputer. There are a lot of things I want to see happen in the world and having a digital version of myself would allow the meat-version of me to focus on more personal issues while super-me explores my loftier ambitions.It won't be me. Only a copy.
I can actually say, without qualifiers and without equivocation, THERE HAVE BEEN NO BREAKTHROUGHS ON MIND-UPLOADING TECHNOLOGY. Not recently. Not in the past. Not ever. Brain mapping, functional neurology and neural topography do not have practical applications for brain uploading, as none of these technologies can actually emulate the processes they are used to analyze (IOW: you can take a recording of what a brain does, but you can't reproduce it independently). It is not something that is even remotely possible now because we do not even have a CONCEPT for a modeling technique that would make that work.lulz.article said:We're still decades — if not centuries — away from being able to transfer a mind to a supercomputer. [...] Here's why you should seriously consider uploading.
He's being conservate, there have been some recent breakthroughs on this
Actually it's pretty well reflected in twin studies. Two people with completely identical genetics will develop slightly different personalities simply due to their stimuli being slightly different. Their personalities WILL diverge since they cannot exchange and synchronize data between the two of them.This is what the general consensus has been for years, with really no evidence to back it up
They DID. They're against it because the project is using a huge amount of money for nebulous, abstract goals that may or may not actually benefit real scientists.^I wish they went into more detail as to why they're against it.
It wouldn't be "super you". It would be "super copy of you at the time of transfer". That copy may achieve those loftier goals, but you'd just be living vicariously through the achievements of that copy.And there are a dozen reasons why I would want to have a copy of myself in a supercomputer. There are a lot of things I want to see happen in the world and having a digital version of myself would allow the meat-version of me to focus on more personal issues while super-me explores my loftier ambitions.It won't be me. Only a copy.
Also: I'm not a religious person or anything, but I feel it might be good idea to save my soul.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.