Hi all first post. I joined because I was curious how you guys think the Tuvix episode has aged. Did Janeway do the right thing? Were Tuvok and Neelix dead when Tuvix was alive? I find the morality of this episode challenging.
I'm sticking with my original position. Faced with either killing two people (Tuvok and Neelix), or one (Tuvix), surely it would be better to choose the option that causes less harm?
To say otherwise would be to claim that Tuvok and Neelix had no right to their own individual lives. Why should Tuvix's life trump theirs?
The greatest good for the greatest number should be observed. And that would be allowing Tuvok and Neelix to return to their own existences.
It's an impossible choice. Whatever Janeways chooses, a life will end. So does she choose the sentient being who is alive standing before her, or the lives of her two friends she has already "lost"?
My head canon is that Will's duplication occured under an extraordinary set of circumstances that could not be duplicated under normal conditions.
Ayala becomes security chief and has to start talking regularly. The kitchen is a momentary issue, until B'Elanna gets the idea to reduce ship cruise speed from warp 8 to warp 7.8, adding about 4 years to the ship's projected journey but freeing up more than enough power to run the replicators.
Warp 7.6, then. 2 tenths of a warp factor reduction to feed the crew, another 2 tenths of a warp factor to keep up with Janeway's consumption of coffee.
Not so sure it's so clear cut. It reminds me of that trolley dilemma (do nothing, and the trolley will kill 5 people on the track. Flip a handle and the trolley will go to another track, killing only 1 person). The only difference here is that Tuvok and Neelix were already gone, but with the option to get them back, and I'm not sure that's a fundamental difference.
At any rate, I would expect this little incident to be logged, so starfleet HQ would have heard about it after Voyager got home at the latest. Apparently she wasn't courtmartialed, or at least, not found guilty, since we see her again as an admiral.
She did commit murder and in the first degree at that. She only got away with it because of preposterousness otherwise she would have been court-martialled and condemned to the worst possible punishment other than death, which seems to be life in a penal colony without parole.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.