Agreed. One of the strengths of the T/T scenes, in my opinion, is the way subtext was used to reveal far more than was being said.boushh said:
While I have my own problems with "Harbinger", I never really took that last scene as out of character, because I think it's a scene that has layers to it... It isn't something to be taken just for the dialogue alone. IMHO, anyway...
That's the way I read it, too--even before I saw E2, and T'Pol's talk with old T'Pol lined up with my take on the scene. IMHO, T'Pol got in over her head--she was frightened by the powerful emotions she was feeling for Trip. The morning after, she was backpedaling like crazy, attempting to downplay the previous night as an "exploration"--anything but the next step forward in a full-fledged romantic relationship, for which she was not ready at all.My take, and what I think was the intention of the scene, especially considering what followed this episode:
She's afraid and uncomfortable with what she's feeling (lines from old T'Pol in E2 confirm it) so she tries to play things so as to ensure that she succesful pulls away and he's hurt because she just played down the whole thing, but starts to see through it a bit and tests the waters at the end, whether it be for their friendship, the NP, or something more... so it ends on a lighter note.
I was really ticked off at T'Pol the morning after:Captain X said:
Why would you ever want to forget that something like that happened though? Plus, she's the one that initiated it. To me, that bit is the worst part, because when it comes down to it, she did use him. She acted to keep him away from someone else, and then treated him like dirt. Trip sticking around and telling her that the neuropressure need not stop was actually kinda childish - like he figured if they kept at that, maybe he'd get laid again. Not exactly dignified in my view.
Uh-oh, I didn’t realize you hadn’t yet seen “Similitude” or “Harbinger” – although now I do remember you mentioning that you started watching ENT sometime during S3. (BTW, those neuropressure caps I included were from the episode “Raijin,” from early S3, so you might not have seen that one either.) So does that mean you are now watching S2 on SciFi for the first time? It’ll be interesting to hear your views on the T/T elements in S2 as well as the first third of S3, which it sounds like you also haven’t seen.Pensive said:
This entry brought to you by tothebridge, who suggested a timeframe for my meditation plot-bunny and thus set me on a course straight for this fangirl madness....
OK, I gotcha…. Sorry, I didn’t remember the name of the group – just that they were Lycerian scientists. Actually, I do remember reading a story along those lines. It was called “Charlie,” I think. Does anyone else remember that one? I think I read it at HoT, and from what I recall, it had some rather thought-provoking elements.unchienne said:
I might be spelling it totally wrong since I never got around to watching Similitude with the captions on, but the Valanderan Circle were/are the radical group of Lycerian scientists who experiemented with an enzyme to stop the rapid aging of Lycerian desert larvae clones…. [snip] … With the Lycerian method the memory recreation wouldn't be important since they are carried over in the dna. Rather, T'Pol's only problem would be stopping the aging, and considering this is the same woman that helped come up with a plan to disable the spheres, I figured it'd only take her a few decades or so. I'm very tempted to write this as I can see the interplay in my head, but I suck at writing dialogue. I've been re-reading The Expanse to try and get a feel for it.
I need to go back and watch these interviews again to remind myself of some of the details. But besides the food, I think at other times CT also has talked about other things that he thought dumbed down his character. For example, he indicated that some of the dialogue made it seem that Trip wasn’t very savvy about certain areas of his job. And I can sort of see his point because early on, I thought the writers emphasized more of the hands-on, repair-like elements of his role instead of the conceptual problem-solving that also should’ve been part of his engineering skills. In S3 and S4, though, it seemed like they emphasized the problems solving more and downplayed some of the stereotypical elements.The other thing I liked was Connor's interview. Though I disagree with him in one respect: I liked the catfish and pie references and didn't at all think they "dumbed" down his character. Weird, isn't it, that even the foods we eat have stereotypes attatched to them. Jean Luc was thought of as "refined" and "classy" because of his penchant for Earl Grey tea while Trip's culinary choices had even the actor thinking he was a...what did he call him...oh yeah...a hayseed. Tsk, tsk.
Well, I think this is where the timing issues come into play. From various interviews, comments, etc., it seems like the addiction arc was conceived later in the season after some of these earlier episodes were already written and filmed. So in Manny’s “Similitude” commentary, when he talks about wanting to focus more on the feelings between T/T and about how T’Pol’s knowledge that Trip’s in love with her will have implications for later episodes (e.g., Harbinger), the trellium storyline doesn’t seem to be a factor at all.One interesting thing, if you're curious about the Trellium arc, is that the writer of Damage (and I don't know how backscene motivations play in the whole cannon thing and really don't want to go there) stated that one reason T'Pol started using Trellium was because she wanted to get closer to Trip but didn't know how. Which sorta makes sense but doesn't. It's been hinted at onscreen (I think Phlox made the comment about Trip after T'Pol said she liked how the Trellium made it easier to deal with the crew) but the deeper romantic development between these two was so underdevloped and wishy-washy at this point that I don't know how much this sentiment bears out. And in the commentary of Similitude, Manny Coto made some statements that led me to believe it was Sim's revelation of Trip's feelings (and he did specifically say that Trip was in love with her) that got T'Pol thinking about him as more than a friend.
Well, in the commentary about “Similitude,” Manny Coto does allude to the idea that there was attraction between them early on. When he talks about wanting to put more focus on the feelings between T/T, he mentions that some of the scenes prior to “Similitude” had focused mainly on the sexual attraction and flirting between them.LOL It's like the chicken and the egg theory all over again. Did Trellium and Trip's feelings get T'Pol thinking of him...or did T'Pol turn to Trellium because of her feelings for Trip? Who knows, but I'd like to think there was an attraction early on.
The theme exploration is intended to convey the concept of acquiring a deeper understanding of the individual and/or society by pushing out the boundaries of awareness. For students, this means becoming conscious of new ideas and possibilities
The difference is primarily between genders and how they interpret things differently. When she said it the way she did in the context that it was in, yeah, it seems more like an experimentation because it was an "exploration" of human sexuality, not an expression of the affection she stated she had for him before hand. Thus, really it was a kind of slap in the face, because it wasn't really about him other than the fact he was human. Since she put it the way she did, that kind of makes it almost sound like any human would have done. So he was basically just a variable in an experiment. Hence she used him, or at least that's what she said she did afterwards.pookha said:
i also dont think tpol used trip .
for one thing trip heard experiment while tpol said exploration.
really examine the two terms because there are some fundamental differences between the two.
an exploration is more of long term more complex type of thing.
tothebridge said:
Uh-oh, I didn’t realize you hadn’t yet seen “Similitude” or “Harbinger” – although now I do remember you mentioning that you started watching ENT sometime during S3. (BTW, those neuropressure caps I included were from the episode “Raijin,” from early S3, so you might not have seen that one either.) So does that mean you are now watching S2 on SciFi for the first time? It’ll be interesting to hear your views on the T/T elements in S2 as well as the first third of S3, which it sounds like you also haven’t seen.
But besides the food, I think at other times CT also has talked about other things that he thought dumbed down his character. For example, he indicated that some of the dialogue made it seem that Trip wasn’t very savvy about certain areas of his job. And I can sort of see his point because early on, I thought the writers emphasized more of the hands-on, repair-like elements of his role instead of the conceptual problem-solving that also should’ve been part of his engineering skills.
Captain X said:
Star Trek tends to always have the chief engineer do everything. Evidently all those guys in the background in engineering aren't actually doing anything.![]()
Pensive said:
What is getting me about s2 so far is they keep trying to test a T'Pol/Archer thing but it just doesn't seem to click. I promise I'm trying to be unbiased here, but the fact that Archer is not written with as much depth coupled with the fact that Porthos seems to be his #1 (lol), kinda makes it fizzle for me. I am starting to see T/T's little quirks come through tho, like "Singularity" where he is fixing the chair and ignores her request to stop drilling for the moment.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.