- Star Trek: Deep Space Nine and Voyager are far more challenging to remaster in HD due to their use of CG. Until now, the original assets used to create these CG shots were presumed lost.
- Through talking to original artists such as Robert Bonchune, I discovered that a large number of the assets still exist for these shows.
- The scene files can be accessed using current technology relatively easily.
- A large amount of the work produced originally was over-built and should hold up well when re-rendered in high definition.
It looks far better even than the work in TOS-R from many years later, in fact.
Just applay the usual sweetening by CBS-D and this will look brilliant!
Just applay the usual sweetening by CBS-D and this will look brilliant!
No! Please, no sweetening of an kind! I want the ORIGINAL DS9 in HD, not some sweetened up version!
The "sweetening" he refers to is the stuff that CBS Digital has been doing to make the TNG shots look more realistic - interactive lighting passes, planets with atmospheric glow, better depth of field - NOT changes to the content, like with TOS.
I think you misunderstand. I'm talking about changes that make the CGI look more real/cinematic. This gives you a great idea of what I'm talking about. Both sequences use the same CGI shot, yet CBS-D makes it look a trillion times better. This is what I'm talking about.Just applay the usual sweetening by CBS-D and this will look brilliant!
No! Please, no sweetening of an kind! I want the ORIGINAL DS9 in HD, not some sweetened up version!
The "sweetening" he refers to is the stuff that CBS Digital has been doing to make the TNG shots look more realistic - interactive lighting passes, planets with atmospheric glow, better depth of field - NOT changes to the content, like with TOS.
I know. And honestly, even that "sweetening" was too much for me and kept me from buying the TNG-R sets.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.