The technology is not the problem, the price tag associated with it is.
The technology is not the problem, the price tag associated with it is.
Fair enough Bill. I was unaware of the actual cost of these things nowadays. I had been quoted outrageous prices like you would not believe.
I've never understood Blu ray techonology anyway. I much prefer my old VHS and DVD collection. Blu ray seems just one more way to get hard-earned money from people who just can't say no to spending their cash all over the place. Other than better visual and maybe sound what is the advantage of these things? Do they even offer the same bonus materials as the SE series from a few years ago do?
The technology is not the problem, the price tag associated with it is.
I've had my setup for a little over two years (Oct. 2009) and it consists of:
RCA 40 inch 1080p TV - $568
Magnavox Blu-ray player - $128
RCA 5.1 Surround Sound - $149
Then all of available Trek on Blu-ray has cost me about $220 so far.
Far cheaper than what these things cost fifteen years ago.
I've never understood Blu ray techonology anyway. I much prefer my old VHS and DVD collection. Blu ray seems just one more way to get hard-earned money from people who just can't say no to spending their cash all over the place. Other than better visual and maybe sound what is the advantage of these things? Do they even offer the same bonus materials as the SE series from a few years ago do?
Yeah, so it looks much better, and sounds much better. What reason is that to buy it? By damn, I still play on my old Edison, and you'll pry my wax cylinders from my cold dead hands.
The technology is not the problem, the price tag associated with it is.
I've had my setup for a little over two years (Oct. 2009) and it consists of:
RCA 40 inch 1080p TV - $568
Magnavox Blu-ray player - $128
RCA 5.1 Surround Sound - $149
Then all of available Trek on Blu-ray has cost me about $220 so far.
Far cheaper than what these things cost fifteen years ago.
And if you're a really good shopper:
Vizio 42 inch 1080p TV - $400
Phillips Blu-ray player - $78
JVC 5.1 Surround Sound - $69
![]()
I've never understood Blu ray techonology anyway. I much prefer my old VHS and DVD collection. Blu ray seems just one more way to get hard-earned money from people who just can't say no to spending their cash all over the place. Other than better visual and maybe sound what is the advantage of these things? Do they even offer the same bonus materials as the SE series from a few years ago do?
Yeah, so it looks much better, and sounds much better. What reason is that to buy it? By damn, I still play on my old Edison, and you'll pry my wax cylinders from my cold dead hands.
I've had my setup for a little over two years (Oct. 2009) and it consists of:
RCA 40 inch 1080p TV - $568
Magnavox Blu-ray player - $128
RCA 5.1 Surround Sound - $149
Then all of available Trek on Blu-ray has cost me about $220 so far.
Far cheaper than what these things cost fifteen years ago.
And if you're a really good shopper:
Vizio 42 inch 1080p TV - $400
Phillips Blu-ray player - $78
JVC 5.1 Surround Sound - $69
![]()
Well the prices I'm quoting are what I paid two plus years ago for the equipment in October 2009.![]()
For the record I am watching Trek on a 1080p projector, 100" screen with 5.1 Dolby/DTS and Bluray and it is a sweet thing... Except when the Enterprise leaves orbit of Regula to go chase the ReliantThen it gets cold, and it is very cold... in space....
What do you mean it gets cold?
You're a man after my own heart, 22! What player are you using? I use the Oppo BDP-93 for my similarly large screen - I find its scaling prowess to make DVD's at least watchable (well, some DVD's anyway)!For the record I am watching Trek on a 1080p projector, 100" screen with 5.1 Dolby/DTS and Bluray and it is a sweet thing... Except when the Enterprise leaves orbit of Regula to go chase the ReliantThen it gets cold, and it is very cold... in space....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.