• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Trek Books that are just horrible -- new and old

'Shadow Lord' is one of the very few Star Trek novels I've refused to read again. It's been ten years or so since I did, and my vague memory of it tells me that my opinion of it was that it felt like someone got contracted for a Star Trek novel, but had no intention of actually writing one, focusing on their separate idea and characters, while having Spock and Sulu tacked into the story and making arbitrary remarks in order to keep the Star Trek logo on it.

Honestly, that doesn't bother me that much. After all, TOS was made at a time when anthologies were considered the highest form of dramatic television, and so -- like many other ongoing series at the time -- TOS was designed to be essentially an anthology with continuing characters. Its strange-new-worlds format was deliberately selected to allow throwing the characters into a different kind of story every week. A tense submarine-warfare drama, a comedy-fantasy with Alice and the White Rabbit, a gangster story, a Roman epic, a Nazi story, you name it. So there was never meant to be a single, narrow definition of what "a Star Trek story" felt like. The format was intentionally created to accommodate a great diversity of genres and subject matters. Shadow Lord is Star Trek as a Meiji-era samurai epic, and that's just the sort of thing they might've done on TOS if it had been pitched to them, although their version would probably have been a lot more stereotype-laden (and would've gotten the Prime Directive right).


This post almost makes me want to read Ship of the Line just to see how bad it is!

Morgan Bateson getting command of the E-E, his entire command crew is the crew of the old Bozeman, and they are all male, even though what we saw in 'Cause And Effect' clearly showed us two female bridge officers.

Also the Typhon Expanse being a settled, routinely patrolled border territory of the 23rd-century Federation, when in the episode it was uncharted territory in the 24th century.
 
Few of my hit list already on here, so I'll just add: Dark Passions set. Wanted to play in the mirror universe, but just came off as playing with lesbian s&m vice adding much story.

Personally, I didn't mind the Phoenix book. Guess I just substituted a less K/S version in my head, and refused to read into it (but knew it was there). Fate seemed the better of the two. I don't mind the Batnam books, they get a pass for just winging it, and writing at a time when the show looked dead and buried.

Well of Souls annoyed me. Just didn't go anywhere, totally random action scene in the middle, and the actual Well of Souls barely showed up, just got a couple pages at the end, like they forgot to add it until too late.

Other contenders for 'worst'

-Prometheus Design
-Triangle (jeez, that's a lot by those two)
-Black Fire(although I enjoyed it for what it was)
-How much for just the planet? (know it was a play on another theme, just didn't care for it)
-Garth of Izar
-Engines of Destiny

In general, I didn't mind the old numbered TOS books. Nostalgia, or just not strict on canon, take your pick
 
. I don't care for New Earth miniseries . I got the books from the library once. I got bored reading this miniseries. I finished the books but didn't really like the stories about the Space Colonists versus the villians very much. Another novel is the Tos Novel The Folded world. And Shadow Lord by Lawrence Yep.
 
Last edited:
I believe we have to differentiate between bad books from a Star Trek prospective (e.g. they violate too much of established continuity/canon or the protagonists act out of character etc) and bad books tout court (e.g boring or ineptly written).

For example, Ship of the line, didn't bore me but I admit it played fast and loose with Star Trek lore.

On the other hand, I found the Phoenix books an insult to Trek characters and at the same time an horribly written story.

My opinion of course.
 
Picard going on a secret rescuemission, while playing holo-programs in which he's worshipping Kirk.

That wasn't the bit that bothered me the most. The rescue mission made Picard come into contact with Gul Madred, the Cardassian who tortured him in 'Chains of Command'. This could have been handled well- could have been amazing. It wasn't. It was badly handled, badly written, out of character, disrespectful to the work of the original TNG episode creators, and disrespectful to anyone with even a passing knowledge of Star Trek (a group to which the author clearly does not belong).
 
Picard going on a secret rescuemission, while playing holo-programs in which he's worshipping Kirk.

That wasn't the bit that bothered me the most. The rescue mission made Picard come into contact with Gul Madred, the Cardassian who tortured him in 'Chains of Command'. This could have been handled well- could have been amazing. It wasn't. It was badly handled, badly written, out of character, disrespectful to the work of the original TNG episode creators, and disrespectful to anyone with even a passing knowledge of Star Trek (a group to which the author clearly does not belong).

That wasn't the only example of lack of respect for the source material from Carey. You should check into the Broken Bow novelization she did; it ripped into the script so much that Braga actually called it out on the ENT S1 DVD commentary. All sorts of inner monologue bits with the characters thinking about how dumb everything that was happening was.

From what I understand, that was what pretty much ended her Treklit career, the reception of that novelization by the executives. I'm pretty sure "don't talk about how bad the thing you're novelizing is within the novelization" ought to be a general rule if it isn't already. :p

Edit: Found an old thread here talking about that.
 
I did wonder why she hadn't written a Trek book in so long.
Ship of the Line is in my very very large to-read stacks in my marathon Trek read/watch. I was already dreading it, it didn't look very good, but I picked up very very cheap at a second hand bookstore who was getting rid of their Trek books. Now I'm tempting to just discard it. I'll probably at least try to read it. I've managed to get thru some of her earlier books, but outside of her Invasion! book I generally haven't enjoyed her books.
 
I think Christie Golden's Voyager Relaunch novels are about as bad as Trek Lit can get without bringing Kevin J. Anderson in.
 
I was disappointed in Golden's Voyager Relaunch novels. I'm still puzzled by why they failed when I enjoyed her previous Voyager novels, and her Ravenloft novels. The disappointment with Golden's Relaunch novels stand out even more, as they were more special in continuing the Voyager story past the tv series for the first time.
 
I was disappointed in Golden's Voyager Relaunch novels. I'm still puzzled by why they failed when I enjoyed her previous Voyager novels, and her Ravenloft novels. The disappointment with Golden's Relaunch novels stand out even more, as they were more special in continuing the Voyager story past the tv series for the first time.

+1
 
I think Christie Golden's Voyager Relaunch novels are about as bad as Trek Lit can get without bringing Kevin J. Anderson in.

I don't think the first two were 'that' bad. I'd say on a par with the vast fairly forgettable majority of the 'numbered' novels.

The 'Spirit Walk' duology was really horrible though. The fate of the colonists wouldn't have been out of place in an old Dr Who episode and was obvious from pretty much the beginning. The Chakotay story was tedious and I can't recall liking anything about them very much.
 
I think Christie Golden's Voyager Relaunch novels are about as bad as Trek Lit can get without bringing Kevin J. Anderson in.

I've got a surprise for you.

(Though from what I heard just a few days ago here, The Gorn Crisis is actually pretty good; can't speak to the other work.)

The Gorn Crisis is pretty middling, I'd say. Neither good nor bad (like all of Wildstorm's Star Trek output, really).

I think Christie Golden's Voyager Relaunch novels are about as bad as Trek Lit can get without bringing Kevin J. Anderson in.

I don't think the first two were 'that' bad. I'd say on a par with the vast fairly forgettable majority of the 'numbered' novels.

The 'Spirit Walk' duology was really horrible though. The fate of the colonists wouldn't have been out of place in an old Dr Who episode and was obvious from pretty much the beginning. The Chakotay story was tedious and I can't recall liking anything about them very much.

They have nice covers.
 
To me, what was so bad was the characterizations. Everything about it felt of and amateurish
My biggest problem with it was that it seemed like two separate novels that were grafted together with very little connective tissue between them.

Also, it came out within a few months of the conclusion of the first Typhon Pact arc, and despite the presence of Romulans in the story the words "Typhon Pact" do not appear in the text at all.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top