That would depend upon how you define "significant", really.That said, I still think the focus on them is a litle bit silly, but I'm glad they'll be advertising Trek, and I would be very disappointed if there wasn't significant new footage in the ad.
Consider: the theatrical trailer was about 2 minutes, twelve seconds. Most ads shown during the Super Bowl are either 30 seconds or 60, meaning it's a much smaller box they have to put things in. Assuming Trek gets a 60-second spot, that's still more than half the trailer material automatically excluded. If they put in any new content, even more of the content which might be recognizable to viewing audiences would have to go, and I'd think that they'll want to retain some of that recognizable material. What I'm guessing we'll get are two or perhaps three brief new bits, mixed in with a reshuffled assortment of the best bits already seen in the trailer(s).
But it's still only a guess. I could be completely wrong.
You're probably right, but I'd stilll be disappointed.
Obviously Super Bowl ads are not primarily targeted toward the hardcore Trek geek who will have already seen the trailer... but still, if you're going to spend MILLIONS of dollars, it seems like doing something more creative than a slimmed-down version of the trailer would be a good idea... it will prevent disappointment for regular fans, and if the material is well-chosen could be just as effective at interesting more casual viewers. And remember, plenty of casuals will have already seen the trailer before Bond or The Day The Earth Stood Still or any other number of movies, or on tv... so I really think the smart thing would be to choose something new. If the movie is 2 hours surely they can extract another new 30 seconds of good footage?
The Modus Operandi of Super Bowl commercials is that they are never-before-seen (except a few in a commercial preview thing online or on tv or something) so a rehash of the trailer would really be underwhelming.