Well, it may not be sentient, but it sure developed a pretty sophisticated neo-sentient behavior that is clearly inimical to sentient species. It lives by committing genocide. Perhaps I anthropormorphise too much in calling it a rabid dog. We don't feel guilty for using antibiotics and antiseptics to kill germs and viruses.
I grew up in Colorado, and when I was becoming an adult, we started seeing a surge in mountain lions ranging into the fringes of town, eating pets and attacking joggers.
The ethic I learned there is that we may be at fault for displacing their habitat, but once a specific animal goes after a person, they've lost fear of us and may have acquired a taste for us. Therefore, that animal has to be put down. Not it's species, necessarily, but that particular one. In this case, it's a unique species with a population of one. But it's gone after a sentient race and attempted to wipe it out, developing increasingly sophisticated yechniques to achieve that aim.
And that's as far as I wish to debate that aspect. What do you think of my interpretation of Kirk's promotion? Or any other aspect of the book?
I grew up in Colorado, and when I was becoming an adult, we started seeing a surge in mountain lions ranging into the fringes of town, eating pets and attacking joggers.
The ethic I learned there is that we may be at fault for displacing their habitat, but once a specific animal goes after a person, they've lost fear of us and may have acquired a taste for us. Therefore, that animal has to be put down. Not it's species, necessarily, but that particular one. In this case, it's a unique species with a population of one. But it's gone after a sentient race and attempted to wipe it out, developing increasingly sophisticated yechniques to achieve that aim.
And that's as far as I wish to debate that aspect. What do you think of my interpretation of Kirk's promotion? Or any other aspect of the book?