Anyone know of a TOS Jefferies Tube setplan? I would need it for a 2:6 scale diorama. Thanks.
okay, thanks, then I need to follow the screencaps of trekcore… for my 1:6 scale dioramaThe only thing available is on the floorplan which basically shows the outline only. It was a sonotube mostly likely decorated on the set. I doubt there were ever any original plans.
If this helps - the cylinder for the original Jefferies tube was supposedly a form used for pouring concrete in construction projects. About 3 feet across.
As a child watching the reruns during the 70s, I thought the tube ran the length of the nacelle pylons.. Franz Joseph's general deck plans helped reinforce that notion.
It was referred to as "a service crawlway" by Scott.There was another tube. It was rectangular shaped and ran parallel to the floor instead of at an angle. We see it depicted in "That Which Survives". https://tos.trekcore.com/gallery/al...which-survives/that-which-survives-br-541.jpg
Well, somebody's repurposed the storage compartments from Space Station K-7...There was another tube. It was rectangular shaped and ran parallel to the floor instead of at an angle. We see it depicted in "That Which Survives". https://tos.trekcore.com/gallery/al...which-survives/that-which-survives-br-541.jpg
I think that was the intention. The angle of the tube looks near the same as the nacelle strut. Matt Jeffries original intention was that all the ship components would be accessible from the inside. That's why the surface of the Enterprise was smooth without any greebling.
There was another tube. It was rectangular shaped and ran parallel to the floor instead of at an angle. We see it depicted in "That Which Survives". https://tos.trekcore.com/gallery/al...which-survives/that-which-survives-br-541.jpg
As a child watching the reruns during the 70s, I thought the tube ran the length of the nacelle pylons.. Franz Joseph's general deck plans helped reinforce that notion.
I always thought that the vertical triangular ladders served both as access to other decks and also a jefferies tube-ish network.
It was probably a simple typo. In post #3, the OP says it will be 1/6th scale. A 1/3rd scale diorama would be humongous!Why did you say 2:6 instead of 1:3?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.