Mods, I put this here because I'm more interested in what the following says about TOS than about nuTrek.
From http://spinoff.comicbookresources.com/2016/06/17/chris-pine-says-star-trek-cant-be-cerebral-in-2016/
I'm impressed than Pine knows enough about Star Trek to know the basis of the rejection of the original pilot.
In any event...
I have to say his facile idea of what constitutes profound subtext rather cements his status as the football jock recruited to imitate Captain Kirk.
Thoughts?
From http://spinoff.comicbookresources.com/2016/06/17/chris-pine-says-star-trek-cant-be-cerebral-in-2016/
I'm impressed than Pine knows enough about Star Trek to know the basis of the rejection of the original pilot.
In any event...
Chris Pine Says ‘Star Trek’ Can’t be ‘Cerebral’ in 2016
To “Star Trek Beyond” lead Chris Pine, “Star Trek” is a franchise that can’t be executed “cerebrally” in this day and age...
“You can’t make a cerebral Star Trek in 2016. It just wouldn’t work in today’s marketplace. You can hide things in there – Star Trek Into Darkness has crazy, really demanding questions and themes, but you have to hide it under the guise of wham-bam explosions and planets blowing up. It’s very, very tricky. The question that our movie poses is “Does the Federation mean anything?” And in a world where everybody’s trying to kill one another all of the time, that’s an important thing. Is working together important? Should we all go our separate ways? Does being united against something mean anything?”
I have to say his facile idea of what constitutes profound subtext rather cements his status as the football jock recruited to imitate Captain Kirk.
Thoughts?