I have a question for you guys, and I apologize if this is the wrong sub-forum.
Some background:
So here's my current dilemma:
The dentist says I likely have a cracked tooth. In which case, there's nothing more he can do to save the tooth. So at this point I can either:
(A) Have the tooth yanked for $40 (after insurance) and be done with it. Pros - I won't have to worry about the tooth anymore. Cons - some degree of bone loss in jaw bone is pretty much guaranteed, which can lead to problems with sinuses, premature aging among other issues. The missing bone can also cause the tooth below to "super erupt" out of the gum, which would then need to be removed. It can also cause the other teeth in the row to drift over time and jack up my smile. Or, none of those things can happen.
(B) After having the tooth removed, I can get a bone graft and a partial or an implant. Pros - I won't have to worry about super eruption, tooth drift or additional jaw bone loss. The success rate is pretty high. Cons - It's expensive. There is the potential for infection. There is the potential for the implant to be rejected. It's expensive.
So my question is -- have any of you guys gone through either scenario? Which do you recommend? Any problems I'm overlooking? Am I over-thinking it? Thoughts?
Some background:
- About 12 years ago, I had a root canal on an upper molar all the way in the back of my mouth.
- About 7 years ago I started experiencing pain a few times a year in that tooth. I was told by my (then) dentist that it was impossible for me to feel pain in that tooth and it was probably my sinuses. He gave me an antibiotic prescription and sent me home. The drugs did no good. Oh yeah, and the receptionist was a bee-otch. I never went to that dentist again.
- About a year ago the pain was much worse and progressed to the point that I couldn't eat on that side of my mouth. New dentist took an x-ray and saw an abscess. Medication was prescribed.
- Following treatment, the pain persisted. He recommended either removing the tooth or going for a second root canal in case the previous root canal wasn't thorough. At my age, I opted to try and save what's left of my tooth and go for the second root canal.
- It's been about 2 - 3 months since the second root canal and I'm still experiencing the same pain. No improvement.
So here's my current dilemma:
The dentist says I likely have a cracked tooth. In which case, there's nothing more he can do to save the tooth. So at this point I can either:
(A) Have the tooth yanked for $40 (after insurance) and be done with it. Pros - I won't have to worry about the tooth anymore. Cons - some degree of bone loss in jaw bone is pretty much guaranteed, which can lead to problems with sinuses, premature aging among other issues. The missing bone can also cause the tooth below to "super erupt" out of the gum, which would then need to be removed. It can also cause the other teeth in the row to drift over time and jack up my smile. Or, none of those things can happen.
(B) After having the tooth removed, I can get a bone graft and a partial or an implant. Pros - I won't have to worry about super eruption, tooth drift or additional jaw bone loss. The success rate is pretty high. Cons - It's expensive. There is the potential for infection. There is the potential for the implant to be rejected. It's expensive.
So my question is -- have any of you guys gone through either scenario? Which do you recommend? Any problems I'm overlooking? Am I over-thinking it? Thoughts?