• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

TNG & The Women

And despite all the attempts to bring Tasha Yar and Denise Crosby back in a more positive light, the show still manages to crush whatever good things that were done with her character. Instead of dying a hero's death at the end of Yesterday's Enterprise, she was instead captured by the Romulans, got impregnated by one of them and gave birth to Sela, a character that the show will completely forget by her third official appearance. Totally worth it.
She had a cruel fate, but at least her final death by trying to escape with her daughter is absolutely in character. I like Sela and I thing she could have been used in movies, but her disappearance is a typical problem with MALE AND FEMALE characters of TNG.
I was 21 when TNG came out and I was encouraged to see women in responsible roles. It's easy now to dismiss Crusher as being "the mother" and being in what some people call a "stereotypical caring role" but it didn't seem like that to me at the time. Similarly with Yar. It was good to see a woman in the role of head of security. It felt empowering. I think a lot of people who weren't there at the time don't appreciate that the roles that the women of TNG had seemed forward thinking at that time. Even now I look at the show and don't really get the criticism.
I think a part of the problem is people don't realise that TNG is an old show. It ended exactly twenty years ago. The perceptions have continued to evolve. In 2014, medicine and psychology are usual profession for women, it’s no more a fresh way to show empowered women on scree. What was the general situation of female characters in American movies and tv-shows between 1987 or 1994?
Troi was a character at maximum level of feminity, but I don't think it would have been more interesting for audience to only have tomboys as female officers. At least, she also had the excuse of having been raised by a quite conservative aristocratic alien mother.
I like Pulaski, but she was definitely too much based on Bones. Perhaps the writers would have given her more originality if she had remained longer on the show. At least, her attitude clashed with the other main characters. She also clashed with her personal background: she wasn’t a widow, she wasn’t had a painful divorce (at least a difference with Bones), she didn’t sacrifice her love life to have a career, she was many time divorced and happy with that.
 
Spock's utter and complete panic when he realises that "The Women!!!" are gone ... is palpable. Not having women around is enough to drive even a Vulcan to an emotional scene that would bring The House down! It can't be overstated how absolutely essential they are ... so, there goes your proof!
 
Guys. Hang on a minute.

This is a TBBS thread titled "TNG & The Women" and no one has yelled THE WOMEN!!!!!11 yet?

It's the first thing I did in my mind when I read the thread title, actually! :lol:

:lol: It was the first thing to come to my mind as well. The second thing was I could hear Picard intoning along with Riker in the turbolift while he talked about Risa during 'Captain's Holiday' saying "the women." :guffaw:

Warmest Wishes,
Whoa Nellie
 
Firstly, I would say that there is a strong sense of male dominance (I'm male myself by the way) in most of TNG. Especially the early seasons. Even Tasha Yar, the supposed to be "strong" female character is actually not so strong. I cite the episode Hide & Q as an example. Weeping to Picard after she was put in a penalty box by Q. I seriously doubt a male character would be written to do the same, but because she's female, she has to be soft. Thus, she weeps like a baby.

Why is crying supposed to be "soft and weak?". I don't think it makes Tasha, as a female character, "weak". Rather, it makes her human.

I would have absolutely no problem seeing a male character cry. In fact, hasn't Picard wept several times during the show, and in the movies? Would you say he's any less "male"? Patrick Stewart is probably the embodiment of "maleness" on TNG, IMO.
 
Must be watching a different series to me. A lot of the Crusher centric episodes showed her to be someone who was strong minded and someone who was unafraid of standing up for what she believed in. In fact, against the rest of the cast, she was probably the most likely to voice her opinion and go against the Captain. Her role in the movies was no more an ornament than the other regulars aside from Picard and Data. Worf, LaForge and Riker all got the short stick in the movies and they weren't female.

Fucking hell yes!!!

That is all.
 
Firstly, I would say that there is a strong sense of male dominance (I'm male myself by the way) in most of TNG. Especially the early seasons. Even Tasha Yar, the supposed to be "strong" female character is actually not so strong. I cite the episode Hide & Q as an example. Weeping to Picard after she was put in a penalty box by Q. I seriously doubt a male character would be written to do the same, but because she's female, she has to be soft. Thus, she weeps like a baby.

Why is crying supposed to be "soft and weak?". I don't think it makes Tasha, as a female character, "weak". Rather, it makes her human.

I would have absolutely no problem seeing a male character cry. In fact, hasn't Picard wept several times during the show, and in the movies? Would you say he's any less "male"? Patrick Stewart is probably the embodiment of "maleness" on TNG, IMO.

It's not the act, it's the context of the act. Regardless, that scene was narmy as all hell.
 
^ I would have liked Pulaski a lot more if she hadn't treated Data like shit.
She didn't have the same attitude toward Data during the whole season, she accepted him later. I think Pulaski was pretty good in Elementary, Dear Data justly because she had a different attitude than other characters: more gutsy, less smarmy.

And what's wrong to have flawed main characters instead of only having outsider like Maddox?
 
It's not the act, it's the context of the act. Regardless, that scene was narmy as all hell.

Hmm, a woman that's already traumatized by practically her whole youth of feeling helpless, is forced to live a moment where she again feels helpless to stop something horrible to happen to her. Crying was perfectly fitting in my opinion, and Picard's consolation was the icing on the cake. The only thing I hated was Tasha's come on at the end (what were they thinking?)

Other than that, I thought it was a great scene that showed Tasha was human, and in no way, shape or form did it detract from the fact that she was a tough, strong woman.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top