• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

TMP Seems more "Futuristic" Then "Star Trek '09"

Ignoring my question. Would you do the same things today?

Like any question... you don't really know until you face the situation and know the details. No one does.

So you would for example remove a native tribe just because it's in your way?

Do you also remove all the good that happens later on because you move that tribe? You keep trying to frame the issue of interference in a purely negative light...
 
Do you also remove all the good that happens later on because you move that tribe? You keep trying to frame the issue of interference in a purely negative light...

You don't know what happens in the future!

Would you shoot a random stranger on the street, yes or no? "Oh, well, I don't know, maybe something good will come of it in the future."
 
Let's frame it in Star Trek terms.

In Star Trek: First Contact we learn that after meeting the Vulcans we wipe out poverty, hunger and disease in fifty years. Does this happen without the Vulcans landing on our doorstep and showing us there's more to the universe than just us?

It seems to me that in this instance interference was a good thing.
 
Do you also remove all the good that happens later on because you move that tribe? You keep trying to frame the issue of interference in a purely negative light...

You don't know what happens in the future!

Would you shoot a random stranger on the street, yes or no? "Oh, well, I don't know, maybe something good will come of it in the future."

If I move one tribe can I grow enough corn to feed thousands?
 
TOS is simply way too quick on the draw to not follow the rules...in fact, the only times the Directive is mentioned is when its broken!

RAMA

You just have a difficult time admitting that the Prime Directive created by Gene Coon in 1966 is far different than the Prime Directive as executed by Gene Roddenberry in 1987.

As the right of each sentient species to live in accordance with its normal cultural evolution is considered sacred, no Starfleet personnel may interfere with the normal and healthy development of alien life and culture. Such interference includes introducing superior knowledge, strength, or technology to a world whose society is incapable of handling such advantages wisely. Starfleet personnel may not violate this Prime Directive, even to save their lives and/or their ship, unless they are acting to right an earlier violation or an accidental contamination of said culture. This directive takes precedence over any and all other considerations, and carries with it the highest moral obligation.
This is from Wikipedia.

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Prime_Directive

A couple of points...

* Who is determining what the 'normal and healthy' cultural evolution of a world/species is?

* How many accidental/early contamination scenarios does Kirk have to deal with in TOS?

If there is contamination there is still the decision on what to do about it, personally I think they should be hands off, and let THAT be their new history, otherwise any NEW interference can exacerbate the problem. Two cases in point: "A Private Little War"...Kirk starts an arms race before a planet's population is ready for the weaponry (one could argue we also are not ready for certain weapons we develop on Earth, but's that's a whole other story). Klingons introduced them first, but Kirk's decision to arm everyone is a disaster for the planet! They'll probably be extinct within 50 years.

A Piece of the Action: Kirk's decision will probably mean they'll have 23rd century technology within a few decades, with it, their potentially "gangster" like attitude.

These are only two examples..

In terms of "non-Interference" with similar advanced cultures, I'm sure Gene Coon also did not believe the UFP should be imperialistic.

RAMA
 
If I move one tribe can I grow enough corn to feed thousands?

Yes, you can. But the tribe doesn't want to go. It lived there for thousands of years. You're also destroying everything what's holy and sacred for them by turning everything into cropland. You'd destroy everything they are.

What about you? Tomorrow, aliens land on Earth. They say we need to go, because they need this planet, badly. Their people are dying. Overcrowded cities, diseases, they need food and medicine, and our planet has it. But we need to go. Would you go? And moreover, they force you to pray to their gods. Force you to abide their rules. They regard you as inferior species. They enslave you. But it's all perfectly fine for them because they badly need it. You like that?
 
Let's frame it in Star Trek terms.

In Star Trek: First Contact we learn that after meeting the Vulcans we wipe out poverty, hunger and disease in fifty years. Does this happen without the Vulcans landing on our doorstep and showing us there's more to the universe than just us?

It seems to me that in this instance interference was a good thing.

There's nothing unusual about this...they are allowed to make contact with cultures who possess light speed travel, its a different story when you start to interfere with it. The Vulcans were also very careful with post-contact protocols, as was the UFP in "First Contact"...and the planet CHOSE if it were to enter the UFP. No one told them they needed a treaty port...

RAMA
 
Two cases in point: "A Private Little War"...Kirk starts an arms race before a planet's population is ready for the weaponry (one could argue we also are not ready for certain weapons we develop on Earth, but's that's a whole other story). Klingons introduced them first, but Kirk's decision to arm everyone is a disaster for the planet! They'll probably be extinct within 50 years.

So you'd allow the villagers to execute the hill people. Nice! Gene Roddenberry didn't agree since he wrote the screenplay for the episode.

A Piece of the Action: Kirk's decision will probably mean they'll have 23rd century technology within a few decades, with it, their potentially "gangster" like attitude.

These are only two examples..

I doubt it since they were bringing in specialists to oversee what was going on.
 
Yes, you can. But the tribe doesn't want to go. It lived there for thousands of years. You're also destroying everything what's holy and sacred for them by turning everything into cropland. You'd destroy everything they are.

What about you? Tomorrow, aliens land on Earth. They say we need to go, because they need this planet, badly. Their people are dying. Overcrowded cities, diseases, they need food and medicine, and our planet has it. But we need to go. Would you go? And moreover, they force you to pray to their gods. Force you to abide their rules. They regard you as inferior species. They enslave you. But it's all perfectly fine for them because they badly need it. You like that?

Evolution is a bitch ain't it? If I can't defend what is mine... then what makes it mine?
 
Yes, you can. But the tribe doesn't want to go. It lived there for thousands of years. You're also destroying everything what's holy and sacred for them by turning everything into cropland. You'd destroy everything they are.

What about you? Tomorrow, aliens land on Earth. They say we need to go, because they need this planet, badly. Their people are dying. Overcrowded cities, diseases, they need food and medicine, and our planet has it. But we need to go. Would you go? And moreover, they force you to pray to their gods. Force you to abide their rules. They regard you as inferior species. They enslave you. But it's all perfectly fine for them because they badly need it. You like that?

Evolution is a bitch ain't it? If I can't defend what is mine... then what makes it mine?

Wow.
 
Yes, you can. But the tribe doesn't want to go. It lived there for thousands of years. You're also destroying everything what's holy and sacred for them by turning everything into cropland. You'd destroy everything they are.

What about you? Tomorrow, aliens land on Earth. They say we need to go, because they need this planet, badly. Their people are dying. Overcrowded cities, diseases, they need food and medicine, and our planet has it. But we need to go. Would you go? And moreover, they force you to pray to their gods. Force you to abide their rules. They regard you as inferior species. They enslave you. But it's all perfectly fine for them because they badly need it. You like that?

Evolution is a bitch ain't it? If I can't defend what is mine... then what makes it mine?

Wow.

In case you haven't noticed... the universe is a harsh, harsh place.
 
Two cases in point: "A Private Little War"...Kirk starts an arms race before a planet's population is ready for the weaponry (one could argue we also are not ready for certain weapons we develop on Earth, but's that's a whole other story). Klingons introduced them first, but Kirk's decision to arm everyone is a disaster for the planet! They'll probably be extinct within 50 years.

So you'd allow the villagers to execute the hill people. Nice! Gene Roddenberry didn't agree since he wrote the screenplay for the episode.

A Piece of the Action: Kirk's decision will probably mean they'll have 23rd century technology within a few decades, with it, their potentially "gangster" like attitude.

These are only two examples..
I doubt it since they were bringing in specialists to oversee what was going on.

Interestingly...the Vietnam War commentary actually agreed with the US involvement in Vietnam...

Kirk should have left the planet, let whatever happened occur, ending planetary interference, while blockading or appealing to the Organians against the Klingons...unfortunate, but much better than an arms race.

If the specialists survive...:lol:

RAMA
 
Let's frame it in Star Trek terms.

In Star Trek: First Contact we learn that after meeting the Vulcans we wipe out poverty, hunger and disease in fifty years. Does this happen without the Vulcans landing on our doorstep and showing us there's more to the universe than just us?

It seems to me that in this instance interference was a good thing.

Curious no one has touched this comment... :lol:
 
Yes, you can. But the tribe doesn't want to go. It lived there for thousands of years. You're also destroying everything what's holy and sacred for them by turning everything into cropland. You'd destroy everything they are.

What about you? Tomorrow, aliens land on Earth. They say we need to go, because they need this planet, badly. Their people are dying. Overcrowded cities, diseases, they need food and medicine, and our planet has it. But we need to go. Would you go? And moreover, they force you to pray to their gods. Force you to abide their rules. They regard you as inferior species. They enslave you. But it's all perfectly fine for them because they badly need it. You like that?

Evolution is a bitch ain't it? If I can't defend what is mine... then what makes it mine?

Wow.

In other words, the Federaton should be just like Klingons and take what it wants! This doesn't surprise me at all.

Also he is stating the basic, inaccurate statement repeated by fascist dogma that were uninformed in the past, the so-called "survival of the fittest", when more accurately it's "survival of the best adapted."

RAMA
 
Let's frame it in Star Trek terms.

In Star Trek: First Contact we learn that after meeting the Vulcans we wipe out poverty, hunger and disease in fifty years. Does this happen without the Vulcans landing on our doorstep and showing us there's more to the universe than just us?

It seems to me that in this instance interference was a good thing.

Curious no one has touched this comment... :lol:

http://www.trekbbs.com/showpost.php?p=4928669&postcount=209
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top