• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

TMP: Director's Edition

Computer said:
V-Ger in orbit of Earth does not convey the absolute enormous size of the machine especially at the end when Enterprise appears as if it were the same size. Considering how small 1701 was inside it and how long it took to get to the center one would think V-Ger would be atleast half the size of our moon (atleast)

Nowhere near that. According to dialogue in the film (or at least the scrip), V'Ger was 78 kilometers long. About the size of Maui. And that's quite consistent with the FX flyover sequence. If you observe it closely, you can see the geographical progression from one end to the other, and while it's huge on a human scale, it isn't remotely near the scale of the Moon, or even a large asteroid.


Those things aside I felt the pacing was much better and the beauty shot of San Francisco at the beginning was really amazing. I kinda wish they had done the Klingon ships in CGI because they just didn't screamed little model on a string.

Uhh, you wish they'd been redone in CGI because they didn't look like models?

And it was never, ever the goal of the restorers to update the film to modern standards. The goal was to make it look the way it would've looked if it had been completed in 1979 -- as I said, it was approached more as a film restoration effort than a Lucas-style revamping. The CG effects were carefully made to look like 1979-vintage miniature and cel-animation effects, as much as possible.

And what the heck is wrong with the Klingon ships? They were fabulous! The spaceship miniatures in TMP were the best, most sophisticated and detailed spaceship miniatures ever built at the time. And they were utterly gorgeous. The miniature effects were extraordinary for their time and hold up superbly today.
 
^^^More like a four footer on a motion control rig. ;) The ships look fine..it's the rushed matte work that hurts the scene.
 
I agree with everything that Christopher said. In addition, I feel that the tighter edit and ambient sound helps the movie substantially, and I particularly appreciated the external shots of V'Ger...it had a finite, physical form which would have been visible to observers once the cloud had dissipated, and all of that cloudy, flyover teasing demanded a payoff that the original version never delivered. It's a pity that the nacelle out the window made it look like the ship was skidding sideways...I liked the idea of that effect, but it wasn't pulled off properly.
 
Christopher said:
The DE is definitely better. The version that showed on theater screens in 1979 was never meant to be the final version. It was an unfinished cut, one that would never, ever have been released if a rigid contract hadn't forced the filmmakers to release it to theaters on an absolutely fixed date. It was a rough, temporary edit that was meant to be tweaked and trimmed once all the effects footage was done. It had incomplete effects, with some shots missing and other shots replaced by filler (such as the lengthy close-up of the UFP seal on the floor to replace what was supposed to be a shot of a shuttlecraft in flight). It had a crude, temporary audio track that was always meant to be replaced with a better one. By all creative standards, the film should never have been released the way it was. It wasn't finished yet.

That's why the DE was made -- because TMP was the only film Robert Wise ever made that didn't get to theaters in the form he wanted, and he was finally given the chance to complete the post-production and editing work that was interrupted the first time. The makers treated it more as a work of film restoration than "updating" or whatever. What they did was to try to complete the film in a way that was as close as possible to how it would've been completed back in 1979 if Wise had had the time to get it right. Pretty much all the new FX shots were shots that were storyboarded and planned back in '79 but couldn't be finished in time, and were made to look as much as possible like they were made using 1979 techniques. The sound-effects track was mostly assembled from elements that were recorded in '79 and intended to be mixed together into the final audio track of the film. The editing was done based on Wise's and Roddenberry's notes from '79.

As such, I consider the DE to be the only proper version of the film. The theatrical version is an unfinished form, and the ABC-TV version is that unfinished film with extra clutter laid in with little regard for whether it makes sense. The DE is as close as we can get to the film that should have been released in 1979.

Beg to differ on nearly all points. There are plenty of storyboards showing different versions of Frisco and Vulcan that are nothing like what is in the DE, and the same goes for the wingwalk. It is a very selective representation of old boards that they are invoking to say that these are all old unrealized '79 concepts in the DE.

There are boards (and full concept art) showing angles that were not employed in either version, and for the most part they're superior to what was designed or redesigned by the SharpLine folk and Foundation. TGT has linked to various pieces of SF art in the past, and the 13 minute promo film for TMP (which I have on super-8) has got a useable (not any worse than what is already in theatrical TMP, and loads better than the lowrez crap in the DE) close shot of the shuttle tram flying overhead against clouds that certainly was ready and could have been cut in to replace the lengthy floor shot if Wise had chosen to do so.

This promo film (which is a longer version of the long trailer on the de disk) was completed months before the feature, so there's no question that plenty of stuff was finished and discarded (like Yuricich's vulcan shots, which were replaced or messed with by some other party for the theatrical release and discarded entirely for the de.)

If the sound mix was so preliminary in the theatrical release, then why have 'finishing touch'-like near-subliminal stuff like the sound of birds and wildlife on the rec deck? That is the kind of thing you do when you are FINESSING a soundtrack, not just laying down the gross general sounds. On the other hand, the DE soundmix is ... just fucking awful.

I'm definitely with TGT in being of the opinion that the DE is a cut-rate version of what Wise might once have wanted, filtered heavily through the SharpLine mindset (the editing may reflect SOME of GR and Wise's notes from the era, but if you've read as much about TMP as I have and talked to as many people who worked on it as I have, you'd realize there are a tremendous number of notions that were jotted down or blueskied), and filtered through the minimal dollars Paramount allotted for a project that should have probably been done with at least four or five times the money expended. Geez, go look at the final cut of BLADE RUNNER if they screen it theatrically in your area. More beautiful than before, and that is really saying something.

The cg ship shots in the de are pretty modest and certainly lack the presence of the original shots.

The other thing folks say is that the DE is warmed up the way the DP intended, that the video releases prior to dvd didn't reflect the theatrical release. Well, take a look at the 1979 calendar folks, that shitty cold look is right there, just like it was in the theater, like the shot of Kirk and Bones on bridge just before the wormhole.

This picture was shot with some pretty silly notions photographically, like using soft light directionally, usually in an unflattering direction, which ain't the way to make aging actors look good, and is actually very distracting and downright stupid, if you figure the light is coming from the floor most of the time, which don't help when you are trying to read a report (unless you are standing on your head when you do it.)

If you consider Wise and his DP did ANDROMEDA before this, it is strange, because TMP looks like somebody watching ANDROMEDA and then tried to duplicate its style but failed miserably, with the costuming matching walls thing and the overreliance on diopters. But it all works in ANDROMEDA and looks like crap in TMP. So you've got bad theatrical decisions and bad decades later rethinks ... what's definitive about any of these versions?
 
trevanian said:
If the sound mix was so preliminary in the theatrical release, then why have 'finishing touch'-like near-subliminal stuff like the sound of birds and wildlife on the rec deck? That is the kind of thing you do when you are FINESSING a soundtrack, not just laying down the gross general sounds. On the other hand, the DE soundmix is ... just fucking awful.
The new sound mix is a total revelation. In August I got to attend a theatrical showing of The Director's Edition and it sounded fantastic in the theater. It was directional, there was a wonderful clarity to it and it just felt right. The 1979 mix is missing a lot of elements which are in the new mix. The thing that stands out the most is the sound of the bridge, the nerve center of the ship. What's going on in the '79 mix? Nothing. There is an occasional computer beep, and that's about it. It's literally just a soundstage. In The Director's Edition it's running a starship.

The wormhole sequence was incredibly intense, all because of the sound. That scene wasn't very dynamic before, but in TDE it finally clicks.

To prefer the original mix is very short sighted. It's very well established that this was a film that was rushed into theaters (the music finished recording five days before release) and the dub is the last thing to happen on a film, but there wasn't time to do a proper mix on the film. It had arguably the best re-recording mixers of the time who mixed some of the best sounding films of the early 80s. In fact, TMP had some of the top people in film sound on it and it just doesn't compare with films of that era and it's all because of the lack of time to do things properly on it.

Neil
 
The Old Mixer said:
I agree with everything that Christopher said.

I'm with you guys. TMP is still my favourite film of all time. The "Special Longer Version" improved upon the theatrical cut and the DE improved on both other versions in many aspects. I don't even mind the nacelle in the window shot! I'm always flummoxed by The God Thing's and Trevanian's anger directed at the DE's FX team.

I do miss a few things in the DE: the close-up of the kidnapped Ilia's tricorder clattering to the deck; and Kirk's second "Viewer off!" command, especially. Also, the male voiceover after the transporter accident ("What we got back didn't live long... fortunately") seems to be on an obscure track that doesn't get heard on all DVD/TV sound systems.

But it's certainly a more watchable, entertaining version for the masses. I can sit through the theatrical version any day, but it's embarrassing to watch if you're seeing it with a half-bored, or scathingly critical, general audience.
 
A beaker full of death said:
DeafPoet said:
It's crazy better than the theatrical cut!

I have no idea what this means.

It was awful. Fucking cockeyed nacelle.

Yeah, that effect actually did stick out for me. I didn't find it bad enough to indict it for me. How did you feel about the major modifications? Namely, the editing. The stuff that counts. As much as I love Uhura, I don't want to see her reacting to the viewscreen for 20 minutes.
 
Therin of Andor said:
I do miss a few things in the DE: the close-up of the kidnapped Ilia's tricorder clattering to the deck; and Kirk's second "Viewer off!" command, especially. Also, the male voiceover after the transporter accident ("What we got back didn't live long... fortunately") seems to be on an obscure track that doesn't get heard on all DVD/TV sound systems.

That's interesting. I've never had a problem with "What we got back didn't live long... fortunately" (he sounds a lot like Douglas Rain, doesn't he?) and there is a close-up of Ilia's tricorder clattering to the ground after she's been 'data-processed' in the DE. Agreed about 'Viewer off,' however. Sure, it was a fairly wooden Shatner moment, but no more or less than most of his acting in the movie.
 
Indysolo said:
trevanian said:
If the sound mix was so preliminary in the theatrical release, then why have 'finishing touch'-like near-subliminal stuff like the sound of birds and wildlife on the rec deck? That is the kind of thing you do when you are FINESSING a soundtrack, not just laying down the gross general sounds. On the other hand, the DE soundmix is ... just fucking awful.
The new sound mix is a total revelation. In August I got to attend a theatrical showing of The Director's Edition and it sounded fantastic in the theater. It was directional, there was a wonderful clarity to it and it just felt right. The 1979 mix is missing a lot of elements which are in the new mix. The thing that stands out the most is the sound of the bridge, the nerve center of the ship. What's going on in the '79 mix? Nothing. There is an occasional computer beep, and that's about it. It's literally just a soundstage. In The Director's Edition it's running a starship.

The wormhole sequence was incredibly intense, all because of the sound. That scene wasn't very dynamic before, but in TDE it finally clicks.

To prefer the original mix is very short sighted. It's very well established that this was a film that was rushed into theaters (the music finished recording five days before release) and the dub is the last thing to happen on a film, but there wasn't time to do a proper mix on the film. It had arguably the best re-recording mixers of the time who mixed some of the best sounding films of the early 80s. In fact, TMP had some of the top people in film sound on it and it just doesn't compare with films of that era and it's all because of the lack of time to do things properly on it.

Neil

It is interesting you cite the wormhole, because that is the sequence in the DE that seems most empty of sound to me. Some of the other sound mix calls are at least open to interpretation, but the de mix in the wormhole sounds (on dvd in my home anyway) very one-note, annoyingly so, and counters any drama generated by everything else going on. Considering that it is the closest thing the movie has to an action scene (if you discount the spockwalk), this is pretty damaging overall.

Also, some of the reels were locked a long time prior to finishing -- it depends on which reels had their effects done first. And the wormhole probably finished (or given up on, if you realize that Dykstra shot a much better rock explosion than you see in any version of the film) earlier than other reels, since Trumbull actually had time to go back and do extra exterior stuff on it when he wrapped shooting on the E model, probably in September.

So at least a few of the reels on the theatrical had plenty of time to be massaged, and you'd figure that the most reused tracks, like the bridge ones, which would be used through most reels in the show, were definitely worked out TO THE DIRECTOR'S SATISFACTION at that time. I don't disagree that the theatrical version has a dead-sounding bridge, but I'm of the opinion that Wise wanted that, that is in keeping with his lowkey to the point of losing consciousness style. The air conditioning sound effect stuff didn't originate with Berman and ModernTrek, it started with Wise (possibly the only way I could imagine comparing a relatively solid craftsman like Wise with a bean counter like Berman), and it started on his ANDROMEDA, not TREK.

And to be specific, you're really wrong about saying it sounds like a soundstage. Since practically all of the picture is looped, there is nothing at all soundstage-sounding in it. The lack of room presence is notable, and annoying as hell.
 
There were really only two effects shots in the original edition that needed fixing. The Vulcan sky matte, and the wingwalk matte.

If Sharpline arts had limited themselves to redoing just those two shots, I'm sure their budget would've been sufficient to do them well.

In the DE we got, however, they're still the tackiest and ugliest effects shots in the movie.
 
Kegek said:
there is a close-up of Ilia's tricorder clattering to the ground after she's been 'data-processed' in the DE.

Yeah, but it was a lingering shot in the first two versions. Chilling.
 
^
Thanks. Didn't recall that difference, and thought you meant the shot wasn't there at all.
 
Therin of Andor said:
Also, the male voiceover after the transporter accident ("What we got back didn't live long... fortunately") seems to be on an obscure track that doesn't get heard on all DVD/TV sound systems.
It comes out of the right front channel. That's also where it comes from in the '79 version.

My comment about the "soundstage" was not literal and perhaps I should have chosen a better phrase. But the point remains. There is zero activity going on, just dialogue.

Neil
 
I also remember that the whiplash bolts from Vjur also had their sound changed. I miss the older sound. More of a forboding low drone/rumble sound. The new is a high pitched screech. The orginal soundled like a ton of energy bottled up waiting to break free the new is just a generect weapon sound.
 
DeafPoet said:
A beaker full of death said:

It was awful. Fucking cockeyed nacelle.

Yeah, that effect actually did stick out for me.

What? I didn't notice anything wrong with it. The window is at an angle, not on the back of the ship, so the nacelle should be sideways. In any case it's certainly a world better than the *magic disappearing nacelle.*
 
Christopher said:
Computer said:
V-Ger in orbit of Earth does not convey the absolute enormous size of the machine especially at the end when Enterprise appears as if it were the same size. Considering how small 1701 was inside it and how long it took to get to the center one would think V-Ger would be atleast half the size of our moon (atleast)

Nowhere near that. According to dialogue in the film (or at least the scrip), V'Ger was 78 kilometers long. About the size of Maui. And that's quite consistent with the FX flyover sequence. If you observe it closely, you can see the geographical progression from one end to the other, and while it's huge on a human scale, it isn't remotely near the scale of the Moon, or even a large asteroid.

However, the scale in the 1979 version proved to a cinema audience just how big the thing was; so enormous that the whole thing wouldn't fit on the screen. Just seeing parts of it in the flyover made it more mysterious. Particularly after seeing large vessels orbiting Earth (the Whale Probe in TVH and the Borg cube in BOBW, e.g.) in later Trek, adding the full-sized visual to the DE just made V'Ger another flash-in-the-pan alien ship.
 
ancient said:
What? I didn't notice anything wrong with it. The window is at an angle, not on the back of the ship, so the nacelle should be sideways. In any case it's certainly a world better than the *magic disappearing nacelle.*

The problems with that shot are:

a) the render is from too low for the deck it's supposedly on (this pointed out to me by Andy Probert...who oughta know).
b) It's cockeyed because the starfield moving outside doesn't move in correct perspective with the nacelle. The ship is "crabbing"
c) The nacelle is visible through the Rec Deck windows (seriously, it is), so having it in this lounge makes it occupy the same location as the Rec Deck.
 
ancient said:
I guess I forgot to bring my scale-rule.

...or common sense.

Anyone with half a brain would realize that you can't have two fucking rooms in the same exact location on the ship.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top