What I wanted to know was what makes the writing crappy in itself- the so-called plot holes, the so-called erasing of whatever you believe got erased? Because all I got was that the reboot pissed you off, and not that the film was in itself bad.
It's satire.
A Very insulting video, which calls Roddenberry a Hack...
It's been my experience in these few, short days since Star Trek came to general release, that the people who tend to insist that the movie represents not an alternate timeline but an altered timeline have been those who dislike the movie. I offer this admittedly anecdotal correlation without comment.
As it was, I was surprised in regards to the extent which Star Trek went to ensure that it was absolutely clear that the events of the rest of the canon remains, in its entirety, intact. It seems to me that there's very little room for actual debate on that point, given the film's exposition on the matter.
I'd agree with your correlation. It's certainly why I dislike the film.
As for the film's exposition... that sort of boils down to "JJ decided to change how timetravel has been portrayed in Trek for 40 years because it suited the moment". Considering that kind of attitude was exactly what drove me crazy about The Braga Years, its really not going to win me over.
Still, at least you're not calling us crazed losers. That seems to be most common reaction to people unhappy about the film![]()
I am not alone...
There are still fans who believe as i do
SO if what your saying is true, how come in first contact the enterprise, which was protected by the temporal wake... actually saw an altered earth, sure when the borg went back that just created an alternate universe....
RIGHT?
Can someone explain that for me im confused?
SO if what your saying is true, how come in first contact the enterprise, which was protected by the temporal wake... actually saw an altered earth, sure when the borg went back that just created an alternate universe....
RIGHT?
Can someone explain that for me im confused?
SO if what your saying is true, how come in first contact the enterprise, which was protected by the temporal wake... actually saw an altered earth, sure when the borg went back that just created an alternate universe....
RIGHT?
Can someone explain that for me im confused?
id really love this clarified for me
You just keep repeating yourself over and over again like a broken record and don't comment on any question directed to you that goes in a slightly different direction. So I gather that the film as a piece of fiction isn't what's bothering you, but you just can't accept the whole alternate reality thing.
That's it, isn't it? That's your entire beef with this new film. Seems like it anyway.
You just keep repeating yourself over and over again like a broken record and don't comment on any question directed to you that goes in a slightly different direction. So I gather that the film as a piece of fiction isn't what's bothering you, but you just can't accept the whole alternate reality thing.
That's it, isn't it? That's your entire beef with this new film. Seems like it anyway.
SO if what your saying is true, how come in first contact the enterprise, which was protected by the temporal wake... actually saw an altered earth, sure when the borg went back that just created an alternate universe....
RIGHT?
Can someone explain that for me im confused?
id really love this clarified for me
id really love this clarified for me, without using the old.... thats different, or... thats not what JJ ment
You just keep repeating yourself over and over again like a broken record and don't comment on any question directed to you that goes in a slightly different direction. So I gather that the film as a piece of fiction isn't what's bothering you, but you just can't accept the whole alternate reality thing.
That's it, isn't it? That's your entire beef with this new film. Seems like it anyway.
Well its what the whole film hinges on it so you really cant blame him. The rules about alternate univeres are so inconsistant in the Trek universe to begin with can you really blame anyone for dislking a film based on it?
I'm not blaming him. It's just that he really made very clear that the writing was crappy in his opinion, and the writing, to me, doesn't limit itself to the time-travel theories applied. Besides, he really goes out of his way to insult not only JJ but also the fans who liked the film. Resorting to sarcasm doesn't always help, especially when you ignore real arguments.
Hal: it's okay, if you didn't mean to insult the people, but try to reign it in a little. Oh, I'm not a man, btw.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.