Imagination, intuition and speculation are extremely important elements in the quest for knowledge. You own example demonstrates that. And, yes, sometimes it can be fun or even advantageous to rearrange what is "known" in ways to look at possibilities in new ways. After all, your strict adherence to the "scientific method" would have resulted in this thread being a two sentence exchange:
Q: What is the nature of time?
A: We dunno.
END of discussion.
That is an utter misrepresentation of how science works.
Science goes far beyond merely asking and answering questions. You ask the question, formulate a possible answer (that's where the imagination, intuition, and speculation come in), then you create an experiment to
test your possible answer. You'll notice that questions which cannot be given hypothetical, testable answers have very little value in science--questions like "does God exist?"
"What is the nature of time?" is a similar question. It has no meaning in and of itself. More scientifically-interesting questions would be, "Why does time exist?" or, more specifically, "What purpose does time serve in our universe?" A question which, I believe, was thoroughly answered elsewhere in the thread.
Now, with ALL due respect to you devotion to the "scientific method", how much thought have you applied toward the nature of time in the last eight days?
Your disrespect for the scientific method makes me wonder why you are even in this forum. The scientific method you're slamming made possible the computer you're using (electronics, engineering) and the message board you're posting it on (computer science).
BTW, you ARE aware, are you not that August Kekulé realized the structure of the benzene ring via an INTUITIVE LEAP. right? "A snake biting its own tail"--came to him in a day-dream.
Intuition is only valuable if it leads you to a testable hypothesis. An intuition, by itself, has no scientific value.
Kekulé also didn't just throw the idea of benzene rings out there, he argued for their existence based on the known properties of benzene at the time. It's not like the idea just popped into his head and he started pushing it without regard for how accurate it was.