• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

TIME: The 100 Most Influential People Who Never Lived

Just a guess without looking:

Indiana Jones
Tony Soprano (longshot)
Superman
Batman
Iron Man is probably there even though he was a second banana until RDj took the role.

Roland from Dark Tower just to throw a bone to Steven King?

The popularity of Tony Soprano spawned a whole new class of character on television, the anti-hero. Vic Mackey, Tommy Gavin, Dexter Morgan, Walter Whyte, Don Draper..even Jonathan Archer had a dark side, of sorts. You would have never seen Kirk or Picard depressurizing an airlock with someone still inside of it, enemy or not.
 
I'm guessing that Superman (his name is on the cover) is there to represent all comic book super-heroes.
 
I went with extended family to the opening day of Hunger Games and it made money like gangbusters. Teen girls were going nuts.

Teen girls go nuts for a lot of stuff, and what they go nuts for usually changes every other week. There's a difference between influential and trendy. While Katniss is definitely in the second category, she just hasn't been round long enough to demonstrate staying power to really be eligible for the first.
 
I went with extended family to the opening day of Hunger Games and it made money like gangbusters. Teen girls were going nuts.

Teen girls go nuts for a lot of stuff, and what they go nuts for usually changes every other week. There's a difference between influential and trendy. While Katniss is definitely in the second category, she just hasn't been round long enough to demonstrate staying power to really be eligible for the first.

I think we all can agree she's on the cover to sell the magazine.
 
^^ I agree, to determine whether something is actually culturally relevant would require at least two or three decades and something that has become scarce - patience...

Bob
 
^^ I agree, to determine whether something is actually culturally relevant would require at least two or three decades and something that has become scarce - patience...

Bob

Agreed with that. Sadly this is the era of "instant classics", as Disney likes to declare their films.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top