But there is noone, it even looks stupid as a made up word.
12 o'clock pm on Ye Olde Tyme Clocke?
But there is noone, it even looks stupid as a made up word.
Was going to ask the same question myself, to me it's more correct than "no one" when saying "no-one was there" but I'm not sure.
The correct spelling is "no one."
It is my understanding, however, that this is one of those cases of the language being written differently in different regions, not unlike "neighbor" / "neighbour," and "no-one" has evolved as a particularly British affectation. I've seen it justified as saying that it eliminates ambiguity in writing (as in, "no-one was there," versus "no one meal will fill my stomach"), and I can understand the desire to do so, but there is no actual grammatical justification for the hyphen.
We were taught British English when I was growing up so I I have always written it as no-one.
I have a bug up my bum about that. It's Daylight Saving Time. “Savings” are what you keep in the bank.I'm shocked more people don't know it's “Daylight Saving Time” rather than “Daylight-Savings-Time.”
Aww . . . thank you. (blush)Brilliant! I like the way you think, scotpens!
That when people don't speak your language, shouting at them won't make them magically understand you.
[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbobnfaBhcg[/yt]That when people don't speak your language, shouting at them won't make them magically understand you.
*Arrogant upper-class accent* As an englishman, I must refute this. The refusal of the foreign to understand something as simple as the queen's english proves them lazy, slackish wastrals who need a good talking too. Continue to address people in english, preferrably as loudly and obnoxiously as possible, and they'll soon get their act together.![]()
That when people don't speak your language, shouting at them won't make them magically understand you.
*Arrogant upper-class accent* As an englishman, I must refute this. The refusal of the foreign to understand something as simple as the queen's english proves them lazy, slackish wastrals who need a good talking too. Continue to address people in english, preferrably as loudly and obnoxiously as possible, and they'll soon get their act together.![]()
A lot is two fucking words.
How stupid can people be?
Noone is what really drives me up the wall.
A lot is two fucking words.
How stupid can people be?
Noone is what really drives me up the wall.
I hate the following, which I have seen often:
<insert item here> For Sell
I have <insert item here> for sell. Very good condition, etc, etc. Will sale for...
GAWDDAMMIT! The item is FOR SALE, and you WILL SELL (it) FOR![]()
^That is one mistake I have NEVER seen.
John Picard's example is a good illustration of people getting things the wrong way round, although I suppose that's a case of mixing up words which might sound the same rather than mixing up actua physical actions: I can never get my head round why people think that you can itch yourself instead of scratching yourself. "Will you itch my back?" Er, what? Similarly, the difference between lending and borrowing. "Can I lend a pen?" Yes, I'm sure you can, but they're really your pens so I'm not sure why you're asking me. Oh, you want to borrow one of my pens? Right. No.
Seriously, where do you people live that people are mixing up these words?![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.