• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers There will never be Ferengi in DISCO

I don’t see what the big deal is as long as the nu-Ferengi can cry. Gotta be able to fit in.
 
Great, then change everything. Give humans antlers without explanation.
Yx0OTcF.jpg

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Why is no one complaining how Trills on TNG had huge foreheads and Dax just had spots?

I can't decide what's most weird about this take. The idea that redesigning a one-shot alien is on the same scope as redesigning an alien that recurred or was featured for, what, sixteen years; the implication that its the aliens that aren't being radically redesigned over and over that's bad; or the idea that more people on the TrekBBS need to be as animated and enthusiastic about stuff that happened thirty years ago as they are about news that's a week old.

Because DS9 did it. It's that simple. And DS9 can do no wrong on TrekBBS.

Never mind, "It's all Deep Space Nine's fault" wins.
 
I can't decide what's most weird about this take. The idea that redesigning a one-shot alien is on the same scope as redesigning an alien that recurred or was featured for, what, sixteen years; the implication that its the aliens that aren't being radically redesigned over and over that's bad; or the idea that more people on the TrekBBS need to be as animated and enthusiastic about stuff that happened thirty years ago as they are about news that's a week old.

Never mind, "It's all Deep Space Nine's fault" wins.
Can you still recognize that it's a Ferengi? Yes or no. The answer's yes. You can still recognize it.

I'm not thrilled with the way the Ferengi look in DSC either (as I said upthread), but I was never a fan of the Ferengi to begin with and, unlike some of you, I recognize that they're not going to be a major focus. You all are blowing this up out of proportion and getting mock-outraged over nothing.

But, yes. I stand by what I said. The fact that Niners love DS9 so much means that you're more likely to give it a pass. Things you'd beat DSC to death with if it did the same things. Don't even try to say that's not true.
 
I can't decide what's most weird about this take. The idea that redesigning a one-shot alien is on the same scope as redesigning an alien that recurred or was featured for, what, sixteen years; the implication that its the aliens that aren't being radically redesigned over and over that's bad; or the idea that more people on the TrekBBS need to be as animated and enthusiastic about stuff that happened thirty years ago as they are about news that's a week old.
I just am interested in consistency. If a change is bad, then it is bad regardless of time. Also, more for me, is that other iterations of Trek were not treated as being completely different continuities for having said changes. I wouldn't struggle with this inconsistency so much if it was not continually used as a tool to bludgeon how much current Trek is an anathema to past Trek.

Can you still recognize that it's a Ferengi? Yes or no. The answer's yes. You can still recognize it.
Same here. Do I like the Ferengi? Not a chance. I think they are a horrible species made all the worse by poor characterization and even stranger make up choices. But, can I recognize it as a Ferengi? Yes. Which is more than I can say for other aliens across Trek's universe.
 
Great, then change everything. Give humans antlers without explanation.
I don't know if you've heard, but humans are real. Yeah, I know
we all thought they were something Gene Roddenberry came up with in the Sixties. Turns out, they were real.
Bring back Worf but have him look like a Disco era Klingon.
They brought back Kor, Koloth and Kang looking like Berman Klingons without a explanation. So....

Bring back Quark with those pointy ears. Have Vulcans be transparent. Trill with seven arms. Bajorans without the nose ridges but instead put ridges on their chins.
Hyperbole is so wonderful.
DISCO Klingons are simply the latest in an on going attempt to make the Klingons more alien. It started with bushy eyebrows and grease paint and then boney ridges. Make up artists have playing with the ridges ever since. Some go crazy and make the ridges look like Himalayas. Some pull back and go for something more subtle.
AIPmqjB.png

You'll note that the TOS moviea (Starting with III) has a different approach than Berman

Since I’m being unreasonable in my dislike of what Discovery has done, then where do we all draw the line exactly?
I'll let you know when they get there. So far the Klingons are are still recognizable as Klingons.
 
Didn't Picard offer an explanation as to the bumpy foreheads depending on which region of Romulus they were from? I could've swore that was in the early episodes of the show. In any case, the bumpy foreheads are kind of a minor change and not something so overwhelming that it distracted from the show. And the changes to the Klingons was explained in canon as well (even if Discovery ignored that explanation entirely).



This is a serious change, just like with Klingons in TOS. You have a point here. However, the Trill were featured in one episode of TNG and a forgettable one at best. It's a huge deviation but it's not very jarring simply because that one episode wasn't impactful to TNG, or to the franchise. That's not an explanation...but the original Trill design, being featured just once in the entire franchise, isn't really that comparable to the Ferengi.



Again, this isn't a major species in the franchise and so it just isn't comparable to the Ferengi redesign.


I just hope they have an in-story explanation. Like that this Disco Ferengi has lineage from another species giving it pointy ears and whatnot.

The redesign of the Ferengi isn't major either. They've just made the ears more textured and organic and the ridge from the ears to the front of the skull has changed. The Ferengi still look recognisably Ferengi. They still have the big ears, they still have the lobed forehead and the back of the skull is still large and bulbous, which can be seen in some of the wide shots of the conference/briefing scene. Also, the points on the ears are straight out of the original TNG concept art .

You don't have to like the redesign, but to imply that it is some radical departure that ruins Star Trek is complete nonsense. It's a change that is easily reconcilable because in universe it's been 800 years since we last saw the Ferengi. That's plenty of time for the species to have changed because of interbreeding with other species. Maybe he's a descendant of Rom and Leeta. Who knows, who cares. I know I certainly don't.
 
Last edited:
And a lot of diagnostics. On a recent rewatch I was astonished to see how many times Picard tells people to run a diagnostic. Any time anything happens it's "run a diagnostic". Sometimes he varies the level of diagnostic for a dash of excitement.
When ever we had computer problems at work I used to quip "Run a level 3 diagnostic".
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top