• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

there will be 'no Papa-Nicole moments'

I wouldn't be keen on this idea. As well as the “every companion must be in love with the Doctor” idea, the other thing I don’t like about the modern day companions is the notion (Martha excepted) that they’ll travel with the Doctor forever.

I’ve always seen travelling with the Doctor as a bit like your gap year before going to University. It’s that time of your life when you have no responsibilities, when you’re young and adventurous, when you take yourself off hiking through the Amazon, or bumming around Australia or hitch hiking through Vietnam having wild adventures. But very few people turn this into a lifestyle choice. The majority see a bit of the world but then go home to settle down with a mortgage, a job, a partner and some kids.

I think there’s only so long you could travel with the Doctor before you’d have had enough. Yes it might be wonderful and exciting, but it’s also scary and stressful. I can only imagine how many companions must have PTSD! It must be a confusing, lonely life at times and I really wonder how long anyone could do it for.

The classic series may not have always handled the companions well, but in terms of why people travelled with the Doctor, and why they eventually left, I think the classic series often managed this far better than the new show has. In fact I’d go as far as to say the best companion exits came from the classic show, and I’d cite Tegan’s exit as something I’d expect to happen more often. A young woman who’s seen wonderful things, but also horrible things, a woman who’s finally seen too much horror and death. As she says; “It’s not fun anymore, Doctor.”

It’s about variation. A companion who chooses to travel with the Doctor, fine, a companion who falls in love with the Doctor, also fine, and if a companion imagines they’re going to travel the universe forever this is also fine. But not every bloody companion should fit this mould.

I’d like to see a character accidentally end up in the Tardis again (harder to do now he seems to have such more control of where and when he can go I grant you), I’d like to see a character who had no choice but to travel with the Doctor, and I’d like to see a companion who just ups and says one day; “You know what, Doctor. It’s been fun, but I miss EastEnders and my boring old life as an accountant. Can you take me home please?”
 
I think there’s only so long you could travel with the Doctor before you’d have had enough. Yes it might be wonderful and exciting, but it’s also scary and stressful. I can only imagine how many companions must have PTSD! It must be a confusing, lonely life at times and I really wonder how long anyone could do it for.
They started to do this with Amy and Rory in their final Season 7 arc. Yes, they chose to keep traveling with the Doctor at the end of "The Power of Three," but I feel like they would have eventually settled back down again if they were given the choice.

The classic series may not have always handled the companions well, but in terms of why people travelled with the Doctor, and why they eventually left, I think the classic series often managed this far better than the new show has. In fact I’d go as far as to say the best companion exits came from the classic show, and I’d cite Tegan’s exit as something I’d expect to happen more often. A young woman who’s seen wonderful things, but also horrible things, a woman who’s finally seen too much horror and death. As she says; “It’s not fun anymore, Doctor.”

I can't speak to the classic series, but I think there's been plenty of variation with the nuWho companions. Let's just run down the list...

Rose - fell in love with the Doctor and wanted to stay with him forever

Martha - fell in love with the Doctor, but chose to leave because the Doctor didn't reciprocate those feelings. She eventually made a pretty awesome life for herself away from the Doctor.

Donna - absolutely did NOT fall in love with the Doctor. Yes, she would have probably traveled with him for a very long time, but that's only because her life before then was pretty damn pathetic. Traveling with the Doctor made her feel like she was worth something.

Amy - already mentioned above. She had a fairytale infatuation with him, but she ultimately chose to be with Rory.

Clara - We don't know yet. She clearly doesn't care about being with him forever, otherwise she wouldn't have him constantly drop her off back at home.

Even River Song, his frickin' wife, tells him that she doesn't want to travel with him all the time.

So I think there's been a fair amount of variety with the current companions.
 
They did try to develop at least one companion-Ace-in the final season of the classic series. Basically the last three serials-Ghost Light, Curse Of Fenric, Survival-all deal with her. If the original series had continued, this would've gone even further before the next companion was introduced.(The novels sort of do this though).
 
and oc course the companions are us, the audience.
No. A companion should not be such a blank slate that the audience can just project themselves onto them; that's called "bad writing."

No, they're supposed to be the window into the show, not the main star. The main star is the Doctor. I don't want to see Scotty or McCoy get all the interesting storyline, I want Kirk. The others are there to support him.

Plus the Doctor should keep some semblence of mystery about him and putting him a relationship takes something away from him.
I don't agree--I think that a well-written Doctor-in-a-relationship scenario could heighten the mystery of the Doctor. After all--what kind of relationship is it if the man still won't tell her his name?

Relationships are dull. Listen is gonna split fandom down the middle. It's like watching Boomtown.

Give me 2x 45 minutes of great action, drama, intrigue, or aliens trying to take over the world or the Doctor trying to prevent the alteration of history, the companion screaming and getting captured and needing to be rescued.

If I want relationships I'll take up Grey's Anatomy.
 
They did try to develop at least one companion-Ace-in the final season of the classic series. Basically the last three serials-Ghost Light, Curse Of Fenric, Survival-all deal with her. If the original series had continued, this would've gone even further before the next companion was introduced.(The novels sort of do this though).

Sophie Aldred was only contracted (at that stage) to appear in two of the four serials for the eventual season 27 but ultimately it never came to pass.
 
and oc course the companions are us, the audience.
No. A companion should not be such a blank slate that the audience can just project themselves onto them; that's called "bad writing."

No, they're supposed to be the window into the show, not the main star.

You can have a well-written, three-dimensional character who both grounds the program in reality and is not such a blank canvas as to have no personality.

The main star is the Doctor.

Currently. During Series One and Two, the Doctor and Rose were clearly co-equal protagonists, and Rose was the clear point of view character. In Series Five, Amy was clearly as much the protagonist as the Doctor.

I don't want to see Scotty or McCoy get all the interesting storyline, I want Kirk.

ST TOS was good for its era. But in comparison to the quality of writing in modern television, it is clearly inferior. DW should not aim to imitate writing conventions that were common when television was in such a primitive form.

Plus the Doctor should keep some semblence of mystery about him and putting him a relationship takes something away from him.

I don't agree--I think that a well-written Doctor-in-a-relationship scenario could heighten the mystery of the Doctor. After all--what kind of relationship is it if the man still won't tell her his name?

Relationships are dull.

Relationships are what good television is built upon. People don't watch Mad Men because they're fascinated by the mechanics of advertising; they watch it for the relationships. Doctor Who hasn't survived nine years on the air because audiences are excited by its formulaic plots and television production budget; it's survived when similar shows have come and gone, because people are invested in the characters and their relationships.

Give me 2x 45 minutes of great action, drama, intrigue,

I am at a loss as to how you can have drama and intrigue without vivid characters with meaningful relationships to one-another.

the companion screaming and getting captured and needing to be rescued.

Sexist and clichéd. Why not an episode with the Doctor needing to be rescued by the companion? ;)
 
Sexist and clichéd. Why not an episode with the Doctor needing to be rescued by the companion? ;)

Would it be sexist if the companion is a male, thinking a Doctor's companion need only a be female is sexist in it's own. And in any many companions have saved the Doctor's life both male and female.
 
Sexist and clichéd. Why not an episode with the Doctor needing to be rescued by the companion? ;)

Would it be sexist if the companion is a male, thinking a Doctor's companion need only a be female is sexist in it's own. And in any many companions have saved the Doctor's life both male and female.

Hell, Clara traversed The Doctors personal timeline and saved most of them. If that's not an extreme role reversal I don't what is.
 
Sexist and clichéd. Why not an episode with the Doctor needing to be rescued by the companion? ;)

Would it be sexist if the companion is a male, thinking a Doctor's companion need only a be female is sexist in it's own.

That's not sexism, that's just acknowledging the reality of their casting choices. There has never been a male companion in nuWho who was not either ancillary to a primary female companion (Capt. Jack to Rose and Martha, Rory to Amy) or a one-shot companion (Wilf in "The End of Time").

And in any many companions have saved the Doctor's life both male and female.

Hell, Clara traversed The Doctors personal timeline and saved most of them. If that's not an extreme role reversal I don't what is.

True! And I loved that and want to see more of it. Hell, Rose save the Doctor in the very first episode!
 
Well, sort-of. Rory says in "Day of the Moon" that he can remember those 2,000 years, but that it's in a sort of (I'm paraphrasing) "side-corner" of his mind, like a door he has to go through to remember it. It's not part of his "main" memory, so to speak--meaning, it's not part of his normal mental construct, since it's the assimilated memory of himself from an alternate timeline, not the timeline he actually lived.
.

The second Doctor says something similar to Victoria in Tomb of the Cyberman when she asks him about his age of then 450 or so and his family.
He says he can remember them, but he really must want to.
Otherwise he forgets them and goes about his present live unbothered.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top