I hate that registry.
I hate that registry.
It's a new class of ship. It does have a resemblance to the Akula class though.
I rather like the Kelvin, too. With or without the leading zero.
Although I agree with the poster who thought the registry should have been NCC-273.
I rather like the Kelvin, too. With or without the leading zero.
Although I agree with the poster who thought the registry should have been NCC-273.
I hate that registry.
Personally, I LOVE the USS Kelvin. I think it's a Trek geeks dream ship. It is reminiscent of 'fanon' designs (old FASA role-playing game destroyers, Franz J., etc.) but with incredible new detail and feel.
I'm completely shocked this ship doesn't make every Trek geek with a 3D program not go.
Come on!
Oh, it's pretty obvious. The Kelvin is a Saladin class destroyer, formerly USS Rahman (NCC-514) until refitted into an observation configuration that added a dorsal pod with a big sensor/deflector dish and a shuttlebay for survey craft. The observation mission called for a new name in the thematic group of Earth scientists, rather than in the thematic group of Earth warriors that had characterized the original destroyers. It also called for adding the letter O in front of the registry, in a system that was in use from the early 23rd century to the last years of TAS.
Her sisters were later refitted in a somewhat different manner, receiving a modern PB-31 or 32 warp nacelle in the ventral mount and getting a bit of extra bulge on the superstructure to house new systems. That turned them into credible modern combatants, as portrayed on several ST2 bridge graphics, while the Kelvin perished in a supposed non-combat task and never got a PB-31 engine.
Timo Saloniemi
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.