• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

"The Ultimate Computer" Remastered -- Preview? Pix?

shipfisher said:
Anyone else wondering if the "Woden" will be getting much of a makeover for its few seconds on screen?

Chances are they'll reuse the Antares they made for "Charlie X," since the design was based off the drone ships used in the animated series.
 
Sounds like a good bet to me.

...They might chop off the crew section they added to the bow, though. And return the deflector dish to where it was in TAS. Window rows on a supposedly robotic ship will be counterproductive to the logic of the episode.

Timo Saloniemi
 
^ Isn't there a line of dialogue in the episode that states it was "converted to automation?" Therefore, any windows would be just part of the original design, depending on how much refitting/retrofitting went on during said conversion.
 
Rat Boy said:
shipfisher said:
Anyone else wondering if the "Woden" will be getting much of a makeover for its few seconds on screen?

Chances are they'll reuse the Antares they made for "Charlie X," since the design was based off the drone ships used in the animated series.

I'd reuse one of the wire models of the 22nd century J-class freighters from ENTERPRISE. The episode says the Woden is very old and outmoded and is thus on complete automation. This would be a great chance to resurrect a prequel freighter design to help tie the two eras and centuries closer together.
 
^ Actually that is not a bad idea. :bolian: However, I would suggest they use the larger and better equipped Y class instead. It stands to reason that they would outlive the J class (which was already several decades old) plus they also look a little better.

fortunateson_204.jpg
 
The stills I've seen from TOS-R recently have generally been good, but damn, that shot of the Enterprise approaching the space station looks fake as hell. The station looks like an 8" plastic toy!

Everything in that image is as smooth and shiny and obviously CG as The Last Starfighter was almost a quarter of a century ago, for chrissakes. I know the ships are meant to be in the vacuum of space and the shots are generated digitally, but seriously: aerial perspective and film grain would make things seem more 'realistic'.
 
Timo said:

...Has a certain Masao been informed?

(Or paid?)

Timo Saloniemi

I just heard about this an hour ago when I opened emails from Marco Palmieri and our friend Bernd. I'm very happy!
 
Does he need paid? I thought his stuff was 'work for hire'...

Anyway, it's nice that they made a strategic starbase different from the K-Series. But now it's something else I'm going to have to draw. (Since it's not nearly as insanely big as the Vanguard station)
 
I don't own the design, since, as Vance mentioned, I worked for hire. But if they want to send along a bonus (ha!), I would graciously accept.
 
Dayton Ward said:
^ Isn't there a line of dialogue in the episode that states it was "converted to automation?" Therefore, any windows would be just part of the original design, depending on how much refitting/retrofitting went on during said conversion.

The freighter is available in either automated or crewed designs. The only difference is the forward section which is for the crew's use (i.e. the Antares); the automated variant doesn't have this section.

The automated version, AFAIK, was first seen onscreen in TAS.
 
So The Antares, in "Sherman" configuration seems likely for the TOS-R Woden? Sounds good, but to tell you the truth, I wouldn't mind a DY-100 refit with little lateral nacelles tucked beside the drive boom (ie. not too visible in the original profile shot) and maybe a deflector dish in a positon similar to the TOS-R Antares (ie. front of the ventral cargo pod). Then we avoid a complete trashing of the original episode with a little fiddle of another, existing mesh/model. An unmanned refit of an old workhorse like the DY-100 still being used in the mid-23rd century wouldn't be too far out of the question, though perhaps less likely than an ENT J or Y class freighter.
 
Sounds good, but to tell you the truth, I wouldn't mind a DY-100 refit with little lateral nacelles tucked beside the drive boom (ie. not too visible in the original profile shot) and maybe a deflector dish in a positon similar to the TOS-R Antares (ie. front of the ventral cargo pod).

Actually, I like this a lot. The Antares/NCC-G1400 model doesn't meet the criteria of "old"...

Although if DY-100 conversions were still in use, Kirk and Spock should have an easier time identifying the Botany Bay, and perhaps ought to extensively discuss whether it is a modern warp-capable conversion or an old sublight original. Especially if the difference isn't visually obvious!

So in that sense, my vote for hoped-for outcome goes for ENT Class J or Y freighter reuse. Perhaps rather Class J, which was explicitly an ore freighter. Alas, my vote for most likely outcome still goes for the TAS cargo drone...

Timo Saloniemi
 
Beats me.

(Disappointing, really. I was at least hoping for variation in the adversary fleet...)

Some open questions remain. Do we get to see the Greg Jein registries on the other two adversary ships up close? Can we pretend the Excalibur doesn't have an out-of-line 1600-range one? I fear not...

Timo Saloniemi
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top