1. How do you feel the Trek book line has done in the last 12-15 months?
I think it was doing pretty well up until the start of this year, the only Trek book I want to buy in the next few months is the Seven Deadly Sins Anthology, and I'm eagerly awaiting the Typhon Pact series but feel the gap was a bit too long.
In 2009 I bought, A Singular Destiny, Over a Torrent Sea, Full Circle, Losing the Peace, The Soul Key, The Never-Ending Sacrifice, Unworthy and Synthesis. I think it was an excellent year for TNG, DS9, Voyager and Titan books (which are the main Trek book series I'm interested in).
I also especially liked the linking together of the series. As someone who reads
all TNG-era novels, I really enjoyed Destiny and its aftermath.
2. What specifically have you liked in regards to the entire Trek book line in that time? Any favorite novels?
I liked all the books I bought in 2009, I loved Destiny and feel that post-Destiny TNG novels have been fantastic (I did not like many of the post-series TNG novels, and especially hated the post-Nemesis pre-Destiny TNG novels).
I like the direction the universe has taken post-Destiny, and am eagerly awaiting the Typhon Pact miniseries.
I also loved the return to Voyager! I read and enjoyed all 4 Voyager relaunch novels written by Christie Golden, but think the Beyer novels surpassed hers in quality and feel they've set the series back on track.
I loved the Never Ending-Sacrifice. If any future DS9 books are set during the series, then I sincerely hope they follow NES's example!
I liked the return to the DS9 relaunch in the Soul Key, especially as it seems to be a conclusion to the Mirror Universe arc.
3. And what specifically have you disliked in regards to the Trek book line of the last year or so? Any bad or disappointing novels?
I dislike the lack of DS9 relaunch novels! There has been a very slow trickle of new books in the DS9-R, with a new book being released every few years, and its quite disappointing! Especially when you compare it to the rest of the relaunch, which is mostly comprised of a duology, tetralogy and trilogy.
I was particularly distraught to find out that you're jumping the DS9-R ahead 5 years! As much as I want to see DS9 join up to the rest of the post-Destiny novels, and am looking forward to its Typhon Pact novel, I am very disappointed that we're missing out on 5 years! The relaunch was an opportunity to continue the story, and it did a great job of creating a Season 8, I feel that jumping ahead to 'season 13', without any indication of what's happened in the meantime, is a grave mistake.
I also disliked the tone of Synthesis, while I can understand that its supposed to be a side effect of the post-Destiny Federation it just felt
too... angry and unhappy. I loved the plot, but the crew's reactions to the Titan avatar and White-Blue felt very... un-Trek. I hope future Titan novels can return to the optimism that Trek is known for, while still reflecting the current state of the Trek universe. (For example, I didn't have the same problem with Losing the Peace, so I don't believe the problem is inherently linked to the post-Destiny state of the Federation.)
4. Any new recurring trends or themes in the last 12 months have you noticed? Anything you've liked or disliked about them?
I like the exploration of the post-Destiny Federation, the implication of those events for our main characters has been very interesting and I hope that continues in future novels. I think the most interesting aspect has been the formation of the Typhon Pact, and I hope that we continue to learn more about it following the mini-series at the end of the year.
5. What editorial decisions and changes from the last 12-15 months have you like or disliked?
As others have already said, the editor 'musical chairs' has been a bit annoying, though I've only really felt the effects recently (in 2010). I'm looking forward to next year and hoping things will settle down now.
6. What changes would you like to see in the Trek book line? Be it production choices or story editorial decisions?
I'm going to agree with something Thrawn said -
I personally would love to see groups of authors get together and plan out arcs for the next few years of each of the 24th century series a little more strongly.
Especially in light of the Typhon Pact, I think the novels would really benefit from some strong planning. I'd especially love to see more duologies and trilogies. And I think the Aventine should become a new series.
Having each series eventually lead up to another 'big event' (featuring the Typhon Pact) ala Destiny would also be pretty awesome, though I think that shouldn't be for a few more years... But planning for it now could help strengthen the future novels (for example, slowly making references to it, or leading up to it).
The main 'change' I'd make is of course the DS9 relaunch. I'm all for having a Typhon Pact book featuring it, and I'll even agree to moving it ahead to post-Destiny. But I think what's really needed is to have at least one trilogy to cover the events of the 5 years we're skipping through. Ideally, a duology or trilogy covering the events of
each year, would be much appreciated. If there can be 15 (or so) books detailing the events of a single year, then 1-2 per year shouldn't be a big ask.
But overall, I've very much enjoyed the past few years of Trek novels, and hope that the trend of interesting, well written TNG, DS9, Voyager and Titan novels continue.