• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Star Trek Franchise in Year 2013

Was 2013 a good year for the Star Trek Franchise?

  • Yes: 2013 was a good year for Star Trek

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO: 2013 was not a good year for Star Trek

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
UFO, I'll try to address the meat of your post down the line, but for now, at this late hour, let me point out that the word is "adaptation" as opposed to "adaption."
 
UFO, I'll try to address the meat of your post down the line, but for now, at this late hour, let me point out that the word is "adaptation" as opposed to "adaption."

Oh, my bad. :alienblush: However luckily there doesn't appear to be much if any effective difference. :)
 
Just voted. 2013 was a good year for trek. Into Darkness was successful domestically and internationally, plus mostly well received critically.

The game fell flat, but that's nothing new. Trek games have been routinely hit and miss. For the next trek game we need to get BioWare or some other major game studio to take on the challenge of making a great trek video game.
 
I think of it as a reboot, but my wife insists its a new timeline of the original continuity. As BillJ said/implied (somewhere), it is 100% possible that we'll see a crossover back to the original timeline. Reboots don't/can't do that.
Sure they can. See DC's Earth 2 concept, which reintroduced the continuity (such as it was) from it's Golden Age.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top