Nothing fake about magic mushrooms. Just read the later works of Timothy Leary.So magic rocks are more realistic than magic fungi?
Nothing fake about magic mushrooms. Just read the later works of Timothy Leary.So magic rocks are more realistic than magic fungi?
Absolutely, and I think USS Einstein pretty well explained why this is.So magic rocks are more realistic than magic fungi?
Yes.So magic rocks are more realistic than magic fungi?
Nice - spooge drive.(Yes, the USS Discovery potentially runs on semen).
It would be a fun idea, if this show was set in the 25th century. Right now it is a totally pointless and meaningless idea.It's a fun, exotic idea.
I didn't like that they called it "organic propulsion" though.
It makes it sound like: Newton observed an apple falling, so our anti-gravity machine runs on apple sauce.
I wish it had been presented more like transporter technology but not limited by the range of a confinement beam. The spores would allow the ship to navigate and stay coherent along the subatomic network for the journey.
Maybe that is how it's supposed to work. Who knows.
Since there may also be mold involved, is it OK if it's blue cheese?Spore drive technology - Can I have extra cheese with it?
I agree. There will be some kind of ongoing problem that comes up, like what happened on the Glenn (to varying degrees). Lorca will want to continue trying it, Stamets won't, and it will be some kind of situation where Starfleet orders any and all such operations to be stopped in favor of exploration (since it's hoped that the war won't be going on beyond the first season).I feel confident that by the end of the series there will be a satisfactory explanation as to why this technology is not used on future ships. I remember during ENT third season people here were grumbling about the expanse and why it is not seen or talked about in shows that happen in the future.
So magic rocks are more realistic than magic fungi?
They aren’t real. They can be given any properties required to tell a story. This is a show, not a documentary about space travel.Yes. Until we know more.
Uranium isn't magic. Dilithium is just a surrogate fictional rare mineral.
Spores are basically mushroom cum.
I agree. There will be some kind of ongoing problem that comes up, like what happened on the Glenn (to varying degrees). Lorca will want to continue trying it, Stamets won't, and it will be some kind of situation where Starfleet orders any and all such operations to be stopped in favor of exploration (since it's hoped that the war won't be going on beyond the first season).
They aren’t real. They can be given any properties required to tell a story. This is a show, not a documentary about space travel.
Personally, I don't mind the concept. I just think it's better suited for a 25th century Trek series that can actually implement the technology and deal with the implications of it.
Problem with introducing it now in 2256 is that we know Warp Drive will be used for the next 200 years. That means this Spore tech will fail. Feels like a wasted concept.
There's also a theory floating around that the spore technology may have a impact on the space-time continuum, and may result in changes to the Prime Timeline (or the creation of a third Trek timeline).
What do you think will happen with the spore tech?
Maybe it gets scrapped as part of a treaty? The Klingons get rid of the cloak that T'Kuvma developed, Starfleet gets rid of the Spore Drive.Makes sense. But I don't expect the technology to be a complete failure. Before it gets discontinued it will be used by Lorca to kick some Klingon ass.
So magic rocks are more realistic than magic fungi?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.