Could be a way to grow larger mushrooms for pizza, or even to stem the Portobello mushroom shortage of the mid-23rd Century.We don’t know for sure if it’s even real. It could be a cover for something else.
Could be a way to grow larger mushrooms for pizza, or even to stem the Portobello mushroom shortage of the mid-23rd Century.
I know! I always grill some when I BBQ, and would love those to be a little more economical!If it'll bring the price of those suckers down at Whole Foods I'm all for it.
Catapulted to the Delta Quadrant and forced to work with an enemy crew if they have any chance to get home in 70 years.I think something is going to go wrong when they test the spore drive. Probably get throw into the future, costing damage to the ship itself and a lost of life, meaning lot of her crew will die.
I will say that, like other things in Trek that sounded strange to me, I started to read about it. Actually, this method of powering something isn't too far off the mark of actual science. Mechanisms powered by spores of different kinds, Microbial Fuel Cells and so on are being studied.
While I still don't quite see why it was needed for the series, it is being studied and experimented with.
I doubt she will in up in the Delta Quadrant. Beside she has the speed to get there in less in twelve minutes.Catapulted to the Delta Quadrant and forced to work with an enemy crew if they have any chance to get home in 70 years.
I also think, that if someone had posted here six months ago, that the Discovery would have a fungi-based propulsion system, they would have been laughed off the forums.
It doesn't take a scientist to understand what a MacGuffin is. Some are clever and some are pointless. This one is pretty pointless so far.
I’m glad there are so many theoretical physicists and engineers here to explain why one fictional technology is clearly more realistic than another fictional technology.
If they had found a new type of dilithium crystal no one would say anything.
If they had found a new type of dilithium crystal no one would say anything.
Yeah, I mean look at TOS - we have a ship that does FTL travel and often near Lightspeed travel on Impulse drive -- and experiences ZERO Relativistic effects whatsoever (basically saying Einstein's Theory of Relativity doesn't actually apply.)There's a big advantage to getting there first. It's like how people credit Rod Serling for coming up with this genius idea for a supernatural anthology show when it was pretty much a straight port of a genre of programming that had been a staple of radio. TZ was well done, yes, but it greatly benefited from its moment in time.
Also, on the Trek front, I'd say there's a difference in using a bad science mcguffin for an episode and using one as a fulcrum for your whole show. Both are bad, but one is worse.
So magic rocks are more realistic than magic fungi?People would.
But people would be saying less.
And there is a good reason for that.
Dilithium is some sort of mineral. Uranium ore is also an example of a mineral.
I think its safe to say minerals have more of a track record of being nuclear-level fuel sources than mushroom spores, which are basically the sexual reproduction vector of a mushroom. (Yes, the USS Discovery potentially runs on semen).
In the tech manual background material, dilithium is not a fuel source anyway, but is used as a regulator of some kind - the warp engine fires a stream of deuterium and anti-deuterium at each other, and they meet in the dilithium chamber.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.