• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The "snag" in the City

David Strickhouser

Commander
Red Shirt
This is adapted from another discussion:
""City on the Edge of Forever' is a "favorite" episode of TOS, so we all know the story. Kirk and the gang discover a functional time portal. McCoy, in a crazed state, jumps thru it, and history is changed. Kirk and Spock go after him, to set things right.

However, if we pay close attention to the details, we are driven to the disturbing conclusion that the 'true' reality is the one in which Edith Keeler did not die, and the Nazis won!

Consider:
When Spock is trying to figure out the split timeline from his recordings of what was seen thru the Guardian of Forever, he finds two contradictory newspaper articles. One says Edith Keeler dies 'in some kind of traffic accident.' The other says she lives, and becomes very influential in the Roosevelt administration, and thus delays America's entry into World War II.

But here's the snag: Edith's successful career, seen at the speed the Guardian plays things back, would have occurred in the few fractions of a second after McCoy's jump, so Spock could have recorded it in just the time it took him to turn off his tricorder (if he did). So it would have been the altered timeline that Spock recorded, AND that the Guardian plays back for them to set up Kirk and Spock's jump.

In other words, Edith's death could NOT have been part of what Spock recorded, either time. It's the same timeline that Spock is recording both times.

Now, set that problem aside for a moment, and consider that fatal 'traffic accident.' The assumption is that McCoy prevented Edith from dying, and that is what Kirk and Spock have to prevent him doing. But in what is now the only timeline, Edith does not die. And -- the big one -- the mechanism by which she dies does not exist, until Kirk and Spock arrive and CREATE it. There is no reason for Edith to be on that street corner at just that moment, unless she's there with Kirk. There is no reason for her to blindly cross the street at just that moment, unless it is to join Kirk.

In the 'real' timeline, Edith does not die and the Nazis win. So what does McCoy do to 'alter' the Past? Something which actually CREATES the timeline we know. And, surprisingly, it might have nothing to do with Edith Keeler. He meets her, is effectively saved by her -- hey, this is STAR TREK, he probably falls in love with her! -- but his presence has nothing to do with whether she lives or dies.

But maybe there's something else! Appalled as he is by what he knows to be medical conditions in those days, perhaps he sets out to fix them. Perhaps he becomes a doctor in that time, and subtly introduces all kinds of advances years, even centuries ahead of their time. Which means, maybe people are saved who otherwise would have died, and maybe some of them go on to make discoveries, or father people who make discoveries, that create Kirk's timeline.

The stumbling block there, of course, is that once Edith dies our familiar friends are brought back to their present, so there's no way McCoy could have done that.

Edith lives, and the Nazis win. Edith dies, and 'our' timeline is the real one. But the accident that kills Edith could not have happened without Kirk being there."

The conclusion, ... "there is no way Spock could have access to the undisturbed timeline, since he recorded only what happened after McCoy's jump."

But dialog from the episode:

SPOCK: I am a fool. My tricorder is capable of recording even at this speed. I've missed taping centuries of living history which no man before has ever...
(But McCoy has woken up, and dashes towards the Guardian.)
SCOTT: Doctor McCoy!
KIRK: Bones, no!

And ...

SPOCK: I was recording images at the time McCoy left. (My italics.)
A rather barbaric period in your American history. I believe I can approximate just when to jump. Perhaps within a month of the correct time. A week, if we're fortunate.
KIRK: Make sure we arrive before McCoy got there. It's vital we stop him before he does whatever it was that changed all history. Guardian, if we are successful
GUARDIAN: Then you will be returned. It will be as though none of you had gone.

Spock did have access to the undisturbed timeline, at least very briefly before McCoy's jump.
Therefore, the tricorder may have recorded two timeline branches. The one that had to be restored; one that showed Edith surviving and the Nazis winning!

Debate-able?
 
In a timeline in which McCoy never goes back, the bum ["Rodent"] who killed himself with McCoy's phaser lives, at least for a time. Edith is the focal point of history, so if that bum were to interact with her, which he could easily do by going to her mission, then that could affect history. Perhaps that bum helps cause the traffic accident that kills Edith in time to keep history the way it's supposed to be for the Enterprise.
 
Last edited:
The plot hole that Spock never had the opportunity to record both timelines from the GOF has been documented elsewhere, too. However, I tend to take the stance that the whole COTEOF is an example of the Star Trek universe itself being the result of a predestination paradox (AKA time loop), one that the GOF is obligated to protect - as a result, it manipulates events and even feeds data into Spock's tricorder to make sure history unfolds as it should.

At the end of the story, the GOF even tries to entice Spock to participate in another time loop, this time one that is required in order to sustain Spock's life! This adventure later plays out in the animated episode Yesteryear.
 
Or the Guardian just has foresight and/or access to alternate possibilities, timelines and universes itself. It had *both* possibilies in its visions. It knew to tell them things had been *restored.* I'm seeing the guardian as a giant, for lack of a better description, road map/array of road signs/ a railroad track switch of sorts, in order to navigate the rivers of time to keep universes on separate tracks.

I've always been convinced that "City" created "Mirror" with the turning point being the Nazis, so....
 
I've always taken it that Edith was always meant to die whether Kirk was there or not! Maybe she popped across the road and never looked where she was going and was hit by the truck and by McCoy going back he stopped that happening With Kirk in the picture keeping Bones from saving Edith perhaps nothing much else was changed except the bum in the back streets with McCoy's phaser!
JB
 
Last edited:
In a timeline in which McCoy never goes back, the bum who killed himself with McCoy's phaser lives, at least for a time. Edith is the focal point of history, so if that bum were to interact with her, which he could easily do by going to her mission, then that could affect history. Perhaps that bum helps cause the traffic accident that kills Edith in time to keep history the way it's supposed to be for the Enterprise.

Yep,it could be the bum getting zapped that altered events just as much as it could have been McCoy racing across the road to save Edith!
JB
 
The real question is whether the space pirates were close enough to be protected by the Guardian when time re-set. If they landed on the planet and ended up in our reality then we can have lots of shenanigans.
 
That's why i dislike the way 99% of time travel episodes play out. Since McCoy, Kirk, and Spock went into the past and actions they took back then already occurred and are part of the timeline already. It is impossible for the Enterprise to suddenly disappear or time to be altered, becasue the whole affair was already part of history.

Clearly if I go back in time to alter history I would fail, becasue whatever i did to "alter" history are already part of history at the point I left. For example I know that if I go back in time and try to assassinate Hitler before his rise to power I will fail. Why? Because Hitler did rise to power. So either time travel is indeed impossible, or whatever I did to try and stop Hitler(even if I went back a thousand times) would fail.

One of the best time travel stories I've seen is in Deja Vu with Denzel Washington. The only part I didn't like is when...

...he succeeds in saving the woman's life. Because if she never died in the first place he wouldn't have had any reason to go back in time. Thus in order for the entire story to happen in the first place she MUST die at the end of the movie.
 
That's why i dislike the way 99% of time travel episodes play out. Since McCoy, Kirk, and Spock went into the past and actions they took back then already occurred and are part of the timeline already. It is impossible for the Enterprise to suddenly disappear or time to be altered, becasue the whole affair was already part of history.
That's why I tend to believe that the GOF deliberately mislead the landing party, simply masking them from the Enterprise and supplying a few half-truths to get them to jump to an impossible conclusion ("history has changed!") and manipulate Kirk & Spock into fulfilling their predetermined roles in 1930 New York.

The GOF had its own agenda, pure & simple
 
I don't believe in predestination paradoxes. When they exist, it just means there was a previous timeline before that, which was never seen. When you change something, it rewrites the timeline, or creates and alternate branch (not getting into that one here.)

The GOF might not be able to enact changes itself, but it most definitely must be multi-versal - Spocks tricorder had both histories, and the Guardian is aware enough to know when things are returned to the way they were.

Space Pirates?
 
That's why i dislike the way 99% of time travel episodes play out. Since McCoy, Kirk, and Spock went into the past and actions they took back then already occurred and are part of the timeline already. It is impossible for the Enterprise to suddenly disappear or time to be altered, becasue the whole affair was already part of history.

Clearly if I go back in time to alter history I would fail, becasue whatever i did to "alter" history are already part of history at the point I left. For example I know that if I go back in time and try to assassinate Hitler before his rise to power I will fail. Why? Because Hitler did rise to power. So either time travel is indeed impossible, or whatever I did to try and stop Hitler(even if I went back a thousand times) would fail.

One of the best time travel stories I've seen is in Deja Vu with Denzel Washington. The only part I didn't like is when...

The Guardian is a singularity, a place where you can have uncaused effects. Bizarre as hell, but science fiction.
 
I don't believe in predestination paradoxes. When they exist...
So you admit they exist under certain circumstances, but still don't believe in them? That's dedication!

Space Pirates?
From the original Harlan Ellison script, I believe

The Guardian is a singularity, a place where you can have uncaused effects. Bizarre as hell, but science fiction.
I'd rather have that than "the Guardian is mostly broken", a far less satisfying explanation (in an otherwise decent series of novels)
 
The 10,000 terabyte drive on Spock's tricorder probably contained an offline 23rd century galactic version of Wikipedia, which had the original "Edith Gets Hit By A Car in 1930" news article on the Edith Keeler page. Spock later records the "Edith Destroys The World" story after McCoy saves her.
 
So you admit they exist under certain circumstances, but still don't believe in them? That's dedication!


From the original Harlan Ellison script, I believe


I'd rather have that than "the Guardian is mostly broken", a far less satisfying explanation (in an otherwise decent series of novels)

No, I don't think that they exist at all, but, when a situation presents itself where some interpretations may claim predestination paradox, I just assume there were previous iterations of the timeline leading up to a time loop that exists because of the traveler's actions, but, I do not believe the traveler's actions happen or are predetermined to happen until free will creates a physical change to the timeline. I don't think unnatural actions taken by time travelers can be foreseen in a natural timeline progression until the action is physically manifested. The traveler therefore becomes the lynchpin that holds the changes together, protecting him from changes, a permanent remnant from a now defunct timeline that once existed, but is now buried and inaccessible.
 
That's why i dislike the way 99% of time travel episodes play out. Since McCoy, Kirk, and Spock went into the past and actions they took back then already occurred and are part of the timeline already. It is impossible for the Enterprise to suddenly disappear or time to be altered, becasue the whole affair was already part of history.

Clearly if I go back in time to alter history I would fail, becasue whatever i did to "alter" history are already part of history at the point I left. For example I know that if I go back in time and try to assassinate Hitler before his rise to power I will fail. Why? Because Hitler did rise to power. So either time travel is indeed impossible, or whatever I did to try and stop Hitler(even if I went back a thousand times) would fail.

One of the best time travel stories I've seen is in Deja Vu with Denzel Washington. The only part I didn't like is when...

...he succeeds in saving the woman's life. Because if she never died in the first place he wouldn't have had any reason to go back in time. Thus in order for the entire story to happen in the first place she MUST die at the end of the movie.
The movie of 12 Monkeys is probably the best one. I started to watch the series and in episode 1 or 2 the time traveller scores a pocket watch from the past and they watch as the future version gets scratched as well, in real time. I thought, "This is NOT a pre-destination paradox! I'm out." I rather like the additional amount of clever imagination it takes to pull off a pre-destination story. That doesn't mean I can't enjoy a trashy episode of Dr Who though.
 
I've always taken it that Edith was always meant to die whether Kirk was there or not! Maybe she popped across the road and never looked where she was going and was b the truck and by McCoy going back he stopped that happening With Kirk in the picture keeping Bones from saving Edith perhaps nothing much else was changed except the bum in the back streets with McCoy's phaser!
JB
This is the way I've seen it for 45 years.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top