• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Singularity is Near

The Singularity is Near

  • For the Motion

    Votes: 2 16.7%
  • Against the Motion

    Votes: 10 83.3%

  • Total voters
    12

ll StarTrekFan ll

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Red Shirt
The Singularity is Near
"In The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology, Ray Kurzweil presents the next stage of his compelling view of the future: the merging of humans and machines. Kurzweil refers to this as “the singularity.
He describes the singularity as a future period during which the pace of technological change will be so rapid, its impact so deep, that human life will be irreversibly transformed.

Kurzweil postulates that we are already in the very early stages of this transition, and that within just a few decades, life as we know it will be completely different.

He explains, “The singularity will represent the culmination of the merger of our biological thinking and existence with our technology, resulting in a world that is still human but that transcends our biological roots. There will be no distinction, post-singularity, between human and machine nor between physical and virtual reality.

“If you wonder what will remain unequivocally human in such a world, it’s simply this quality — ours is the species that inherently seeks to extend its physical and mental reach beyond current limitations.” " -kurzweilai.net


Here are links on the topic of the Singularity both for and against:


(A)
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

(B)
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

(C)
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

(D)
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

(E)
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

(F) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrZdAL_2LoU

(G) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TpbRpvDKy74

(H) https://www.technologyreview.com/s/425733/paul-allen-the-singularity-isnt-near/

(I) http://www.singularity.com/KurzweilFuturist.pdf

(J) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OZDYGETKas&t=476s


Thoughts?
 
Lots of spiked egg nog?

A standard format for formal debates is to create an unambiguous motion for which two competing sides argue both for and against (i.e. Motion: "X"-- For the Motion: I Agree with "X", Against the Motion: I Disagree with "X") ..

Notice sources are both For and Against..
 
YAXX97v.jpg
 
Hey, RAMA, Discovery sucks my left one!

Sits and waits for nuclear explosion... :whistle:

Thank you for your "thoughtful" post and general level of "maturity"..

FYI, I do not espouse to the Singularity (however this is irrelevant to the Motion itself)..

It's interesting that on a Star Trek forum a conversation about hypothetical, futuristic Science & Tech gets derailed from the off..

If I made a thread concerning the book(s) The Physics of Star Trek, Beyond Star Trek, Superintelligence, Physics of the Future, Physics of the Impossible, Our Final Invention, How to Create a Mind, Abundance, The Furture of the Mind, ect. ect. ect. would you all (i.e. everyone who has posted on this thread) be similarly "thoughtful" and "mature"?
 
Thoughts?

Perhaps the Singularity will be better at cutting and pasting and also at creating threads.

Thank you for your "thoughtful" post and general level of "maturity"..

FYI, I do not espouse to the Singularity (however this is irrelevant to the Motion itself)..

It's interesting that on a Star Trek forum a conversation about hypothetical, futuristic Science & Tech gets derailed from the off..

If I made a thread concerning the book(s) The Physics of Star Trek, Beyond Star Trek, Superintelligence, Physics of the Future, Physics of the Impossible, Our Final Invention, How to Create a Mind, Abundance, The Furture of the Mind, ect. ect. ect. would you all (i.e. everyone who has posted on this thread) be similarly "thoughtful" and "mature"?
You seem to want everyone to conform to your rules and perform in lockstep - perhaps you are the Singularity.

Where's the off switch?
 
Last edited:
Kurzweil is an odd dude with Daddy issues.

Daddy's dead, Ray. Daddy's been dead for a long time.
 
If I made a thread concerning the book(s) The Physics of Star Trek, Beyond Star Trek, Superintelligence, Physics of the Future, Physics of the Impossible, Our Final Invention, How to Create a Mind, Abundance, The Furture of the Mind, ect. ect. ect. would you all (i.e. everyone who has posted on this thread) be similarly "thoughtful" and "mature"?

No. The precise reason I watch Star Trek is because I want to have fun. I talk about Star Trek because I want to have fun. The world's a serious place, I like to take a break from it every once in a while.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top