I'd be grateful and just look the other way....More seriously, just change it and ignore the fact that it's been changed. The audience will accept that.
Fabius, I've amended your thread title (slightly) in an effort to reduce the likelihood of "S.H.I.T." being displayed prominently on the Main Index.The Sequel Hints for Improving Trek List
<snip>
Fabius, I've amended your thread title (slightly) in an effort to reduce the likelihood of "S.H.I.T." being displayed prominently on the Main Index.The Sequel Hints for Improving Trek List
<snip>
I'll also add this link to another thread in which are collected many suggestions/wants/ideas for the sequel movie:
What actors / characters / plots do you want to see in Star Trek XII?
That Engineering is really, really big and that we don't even know what part of it we saw in this movie.
More seriously, just change it and ignore the fact that it's been changed. The audience will accept that.
The audience isn't composed of "Trek fans" anymore.That Engineering is really, really big and that we don't even know what part of it we saw in this movie.
More seriously, just change it and ignore the fact that it's been changed. The audience will accept that.
Yes. Trek fans are very forgiving that way.![]()
1)
5) An alien we haven't seen in the movies yet. I mean come on, there's plenty of time for Klingons.
)
2. Every single line of Scotty's should not be a joke, and his jar jar like sidekick should die in a transporter accident.
NO to Shatner (get over it guys). No to Nimoy as well. He passed the torch well in this film, there's no need for him to be the sequel.
I liked the lens flares
NO to Shatner (get over it guys). No to Nimoy as well. He passed the torch well in this film, there's no need for him to be the sequel.
I liked the lens flares
Can you explain what the lens flares are all about...every time I ask this question the thread gets buried and I never see the reply! What is the reason for it...?
NO to Shatner (get over it guys). No to Nimoy as well. He passed the torch well in this film, there's no need for him to be the sequel.
I liked the lens flares
Can you explain what the lens flares are all about...every time I ask this question the thread gets buried and I never see the reply! What is the reason for it...?
For reasons of kewl I imagine
I think the flares are meant to be more naturalistic. Making everything just feel a bit more real. Some hate it, some barely noticed. I can take or leave it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.