The Christian message is "treat others as you would like to be treated": the idea of people having different wants or needs is out of question. Your values are everybody's values, and if people don't follow them, then they are actively rejecting your values, instead of simply following their own. Your religion is the solid centre of the universe, and everybody moves in relation to it: towards, against, or around it. You want to be a good Christian, so everybody must want to be a good Christian. I mean, who wouldn't want that, right? Wrong.
The humanist message, on the other hand, is: treat others as they want to be treated. Take an interest in people. Allow for differences. Be kind, but don't be overbearing. Treat them with respect. Don't ever think you know what people want or need. Or, more succinctly, "don't be a douche".
some of that essential content from the bible:
Well, being pedant in religious discussions is kinda my shtick.I'm sorry, but you're making a distinction without a difference in the way 99.9% of people understand and mean that quote.The Christian message is "treat others as you would like to be treated": the idea of people having different wants or needs is out of question. (...)
The humanist message, on the other hand, is: treat others as they want to be treated.
Oh yes. I have so much fun with them. Too bad they usually stop talking to me after a while.So what I hear you saying is, you'd fit right in with the fundygelicals in religious discussion?runs
Undoubtedly that's it. Though only the panhandlers pay attention to me when I'm hobbling up the street. Never any foxy babes. Come to think of it, I've never seen a foxy babe in this neighborhood in the last seven years.^^ Probably your raw sexual magnetism making them question things too much.![]()
I guess you never heard of sarcasm.Gene Roddenberry (who also didn't understand the symbolic meaning of Eucharist and assumed this to be a cannibalistic ritual).
I like Star Trek. Anyone else?
What's Star Trek?I like Star Trek. Anyone else?
I think it more likely that he thoroughly understood the concept of transubstantiation.Gene Roddenbery continues how this was the crucial point in his life that made it "clear" to him "that religion was largely nonsense."
Obviously symbolism was a concept completely alien to him, therefore I find this kind of hilarious misinterpretation rather sad.
You're ignoring that Star Trek, particularly in its later forms, tells us that a Third World War (which nearly destroyed humanity), and first contact with aliens caused the people of Earth to re-evaluate their goals and they joined together to improve themselves and society.
If the first two world wars didn't do it, what makes you think a third one would? Is it the old saying, "Three time's the charm"? Then I can understand where you are coming from as far as how Star Trek Universe comes into being, but again, reality does paint a different picture.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.