• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Prime Universe....no more.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I won, If someone else feels they lost that's not my concern. It was a game against my own expectations and not anyone elses. I was very happy with the movie I got, and will be happy to see what they do next.

Sigh! It is quite clear you are upset at me pointing out that all the Trek up to this point has now been erased. "Oh I still have my DVDs"...blah blah blah. Sorry buddy but the Trek that is on those DVDs is now dead. Expect NOTHING to be added to it. All those characters, stories arc and potential stories involved in them is now gone. But again you are probably "happy" with seeing a rehash of the old into the new. Like seeing Khan 2.0 is worth seeing? It is amazing how far the Trek fans have fallen with regards to Trek itself.

Pocket Books....

http://www.simonandschuster.com/search?term=Star+Trek

What's it like to be so damn wrong. Rapture?

You see if there are stories still being written in that universe then it wasn't erased.

That's called logic.
 
Last edited:
And, know what? SO WHAT if all that we know is erased and gone?

Hard to swallow, sure. But we were never revisiting any of that again. So either we start over or we "erase" it all.

Would it have been nice if the movie adhered better to canon? Sure. It could've been done and still maintained excitement and all, but they didn't do that route.

I don't even think it's a matter of not going that route. I'm pretty much of the opinion that Star Trek canon is just too big and inconsistent for anybody to keep straight. I see just as many errors in the various novels and fanfic as I do on screen, even the most hardcore Trekkers miss or misinterpret or ignore certain things. Orci and Kurtzman did what any professionals would have to do: they balanced what they thought was vital, against what they thought needed to be changed, and then against what the studio said had to be in there. That's all you can ever do. O fcourse there ar esome who will claim "smart writers don't need to violate canon," but it's doubtful any of these people have ever been actually employed as a writer. Orci and Kurtzman went a lot farther to please the hardcore than most screenwriters would have done, and I appreciate their effort.
 
Granted, but there was little need to a)destroy Vulcan b)give such a young Kirk a command.

I'll wave away the destruction of Vulcan. Fine, it may change all of Trek history as we know it so we'll go on with this "new universe."

But dammit couldn't they have simply flashed-forward five years before giving Kirk the Enterprise?
 
I agree, Star Trek canon is too inconsistent and internally self-contradictory for anyone to even want to attempt to satisfy it. That's just the way writer-shared universes work if there's no strong, monolithic set of rules enforced by a strict and authoritative show-runner.

Star Trek has had a number of "universe bibles" over the years, but they were all published after the fact. Writers are free to do whatever they like - as evinced by VOY's main character being written differently every week, or the direct and blatant contradiction about whether Earth humans use money or not.

Anyone who thinks Star Trek canon is anything other than a pot of gooey overcooked spaghetti has nostalgia filter glasses as thick as coke-bottles welded to their faces.

I'm glad they decided to set aside the canon. It's a goddamn mess and if someone from Paramount could go in and actually watch what happened on screen and cherry-pick out the good parts rather than unilaterally declaring it all canon, I'd be a lot happier. Until then, it has rightfully earned a place on a high shelf while the new universe gets its sea legs.
 
Here's my take on the whole new storyline: Star Trek itself was overwritten/bypassed by the later shows and thus was no longer a viable entity for the film makers of today. The only way for them to have freedom in going back to the days of the original adventures with today's technology (and beyond) was to erase/rewrite the later story lines and political correctness back out of the Trek universe. It isn't a perfect rewrite, but it isn't bad either. I, for one think a story set strictly in the established timeline could have been great. I also believe that the original design of the Enterprise would have been beautiful on the big screen with nothing more than minor touch ups. That's not what was in the cards for us, though and I'm okay with that for this film. It's a good sci-fi movie with a Trek heart. I think it's what the franchise probably needs to regain some audience before taking new chances. The new movie in no way diminishes my like of the older films or shows. It's new, it's different, but it's not for everyone.
 
Orci and Kurtzman did what any professionals would have to do: they balanced what they thought was vital, against what they thought needed to be changed, and then against what the studio said had to be in there. That's all you can ever do. O fcourse there ar esome who will claim "smart writers don't need to violate canon," but it's doubtful any of these people have ever been actually employed as a writer. Orci and Kurtzman went a lot farther to please the hardcore than most screenwriters would have done, and I appreciate their effort.

Hear, hear!
 
It's amazing how people will argue that -- say, for example -- the Enterprise can't fly through a planet's atmosphere, not because of what we saw on-screen, but only because Roddenberry said it couldn't in a book about the making of Star Trek...

...but many of those same people can't accept what the writers of this film have said about their intentions regarding the two separate alternate timelines.
 
Prime Universe exists in parallel to the new one. It is that simple folks.


There is nothing in the movie to suggest this. There is sufficient dialogue to suggest otherwise. The prime universe is dead. Why else did Spock not go back to his "universe" if it was not dead?

According to Data in "Parallels", every time someone makes a decision, every time a different course of action is taken, and every time someone turns left instead of right, a parallel universe is branched from that point.

Nero arrived and did things that did not originally happen. By getting blown up, the Kelvin "turned left" when they originally "turned right" in a manner of speaking.

So -- was Data lying when he explained how parallel universes work?

Additionally, I am curious to know that if Gene Roddenberry or Rick Berman or Manny Coto or any one of the other TNG/DS9/VOY/TOS writers had done this movie the exact same way, would you also discount their explicit statements that it was a "parallel universe?" I suspect not.
 
Last edited:
the fact that we are even having this argument, where everyone can reasonably claim to be right, and everyone is also partly wrong, proves why the franchise needed to be rebooted
 
It just occurred to me how much the arguments about this resemble people's arguments about religion and religious beliefs.

Which, I'm thinking, is not so much of a coincidence. :lol:
 
^ Nope. Definitely not.

I don't think it's because people (most, anyway ;) ) think of Trek as a religion. I think it's merely proof that people can get personally invested in the darndest things.
 
I hate the idea of having Prime Trek erased so I disagree with Treker 47 on this issue. It would make everything feel like one of those ep's like "Year of Hell" that might be fun to watch but also feels dramtically pointless since we know it will be erased. Abrams idea of seperating the two trekverses was great for this reason. You get a new universe to play in but you don't shit on everything that has come before.

As for canon in the orignal universe as being a problem. I think this is very overstated by the fans and maybe even the writers. Most canon issues can be resolved with a line or two in most instances. If you want Starfleet people to see Romulans during the earth/starfleet war just say their appearence was classfied as a secret. A million other excues can be used as well. Canon should be observed in the sense that I feel like it helps give the trekverse some depth in that it makes the universe seem realisitc or realisitc as a universe with bumpy foreheaded aliens that speak english can be realisitc.

The problem was Berman more than the Trekverse. People are applauding the idea od destroying Vulcan but that is something that could have been done in the Prime universe. Ds9 did takes some chances, such as the Dominion War,Maquis etc that shook up landscape but most of the time Berman was afraid to do anything that changed the status quo of the trekverse. That is what the issue is about. It's not canon but a willingness to take chances and shake things up. Abrams did this and Berman was afraid to and the Trekverse in return started to get boring.

Jason
 
As for canon in the orignal universe as being a problem. I think this is very overstated by the fans and maybe even the writers. Most canon issues can be resolved with a line or two in most instances. If you want Starfleet people to see Romulans during the earth/starfleet war just say their appearence was classfied as a secret. A million other excues can be used as well. Canon should be observed in the sense that I feel like it helps give the trekverse some depth in that it makes the universe seem realisitc or realisitc as a universe with bumpy foreheaded aliens that speak english can be realisitc.

I disagree. When you can have main characters having plot-important conversations in three different places directly contradicting each other on obvious, daily-relevance components of the story world, you have a severe problem with convoluted and contradictory canon.

Case in point: http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Money

That article doesn't mention the several mentions of credits in exchange for goods and services in TOS, Uhura's offer to buy a tribble for 10 credits, or what's-her-name in TWOK talking about securing funding for research.
 
The prime universe is gone. The only person that is/was aware of it was Spock and those that he told. Spock should of at the end of the movie instead of helping set up a new colony for surviving Vulcans but instead he should of been trying to devise a way to repair the time line. By not doing so he alters the future and allows the destruction of his home planet plus 6 billion Vulcans.
Not at all what I took from the film. Interviews with the writers make it clear this is a parallel universe that branched off of the Prime universe, and the Prime universe is intact. I read that at Startrekmovie.com.

What I took from the film was that whenever someone goes back and screws with time, it creates an entirely alternate reality (same exact thing as "alternate universe," IMO). Therefore if Spock were to travel through time and stop Nero or stop the destruction of Romulus, he wouldn't be "repairing the timeline," he would be creating a new one. And since there are plenty of alternate realities where Vulcan was never destroyed, there's no point in doing that. No matter what he does, this newly-created reality where Vulcan died is always going to exist. He's needed here, in this alternate reality, where he can help rebuild the Vulcan civilization.

This opens up an interesting can of worms, for me. I know the original writers didn't intend this, but what the hell... This means that when Bones went through the Guardian in TOS, he didn't alter their reality, he created an alternate universe where Edith Keeler lived. Kirk and Spock were probably shifted into that universe (because of their proximity to the Guardian, I guess) before even stepping through the Guardian. From the Enterprise's perspective, they must've vanished from the planet and never returned. When Kirk and Spock went through, they created yet another alternate reality where they found Bones and Edith Keeler did die. When they all returned to the future at the end, they didn't return to their original universe; they returned to the future of that second alternate reality Kirk & Spock created (unless the Guardian bridges not just time, but also universes, in which case it could've returned them to their original reality).

Same thing with Star Trek IV and First Contact. They failed to save Earth in their original realities, but in going back through time they created alternate realities where they succeeded.

When Pike is questioned by Nero he says he "prevented genocide" by destroying Vulcan. Pike tells him that he is "blaming the Federation for something that hasn't happened". Nero later says "my purpose is not to avoid the destruction of the home I love but to make sure but to create a Romulus that is free to exist without the Federation". Only they are the ones worth saving.

You misheard part of that. I thought as you did until I listened more closely the second time I watched it. He said his purpose was not "JUST" to avoid the destruction of Romulus. That means his plan was to destroy the Federation and then go to either 23rd or 24th Century Romulus and save it. He probably knew that if he were to go to 23rd Century Romulus first, they may have stopped him (because they may be ruthless and expansionist, but we have no reason to believe they were genocidal. They'd probably rather conquer a bunch of perfectly good worlds than destroy them). OR, maybe he already contacted Romulus during those 25 years (giving them advanced tech, teaching them about the future, etc., which would explain what he was doing all that time), told them how to save their future, and has their unofficial approval to destroy the Federation on his own. And if he were caught they'd deny they knew anything about it.

As for the "preventing genocide" part, all that means is Nero probably believes he's changing his own timeline. He doesn't agree with Uhura about alternate realities. He agrees with you. Doesn't mean he's right, though.

Since the time line was not repaired, the prime universe is gone.
Which depends entirely on the assumption that this wasn't an alternate universe, but the writers have already stated in interviews and through Uhura that it is. "Alternate reality" is the same thing as "alternate universe." The difference is semantic, IMO.

So Nero in is deluded way is affecting his future by destroying Vulcan and Earth. So why people say that this new movie is an alternate is incorrect. The villain is trying to alter "the future"....his future.
That's not implicit, and even if it were true, that doesn't mean he's correct. As I wrote, if he believes he's saving HIS Romulus, all that means is that he doesn't agree with Uhura about alternate realities. If he does agree with her, then he's trying to save THIS Romulus because in it's still a Romulus (if I found myself in an alternate Earth, I'd still feel an allegiance to it) and destroy THIS Federation out of a mix of spite and jingoism.
 
I hate the idea of having Prime Trek erased so I disagree with Treker 47 on this issue. It would make everything feel like one of those ep's like "Year of Hell" that might be fun to watch but also feels dramtically pointless since we know it will be erased.

It's funny, even though the conversations between Chakotay and the dad frmo that 70s Show never 'happened', they are still some of my favourite lines from all of Voyager. Does this become untrue because it got erased? Is 'Yesterdays Enterprise' not a totally badass episode even though it got erased? All things happened, all things did not happen. Can't I enjoy T3 and The Sarah Connor Chronicles, just because they are in different timelines?
 
I hate the idea of having Prime Trek erased so I disagree with Treker 47 on this issue. It would make everything feel like one of those ep's like "Year of Hell" that might be fun to watch but also feels dramtically pointless since we know it will be erased.

It's funny, even though the conversations between Chakotay and the dad frmo that 70s Show never 'happened', they are still some of my favourite lines from all of Voyager. Does this become untrue because it got erased? Is 'Yesterdays Enterprise' not a totally badass episode even though it got erased? All things happened, all things did not happen. Can't I enjoy T3 and The Sarah Connor Chronicles, just because they are in different timelines?

I'm sorry, I've never heard of the things you're talking about.

It is possible you were somehow shielded from the "temporal wave." ;)
 
I hate the idea of having Prime Trek erased so I disagree with Treker 47 on this issue. It would make everything feel like one of those ep's like "Year of Hell" that might be fun to watch but also feels dramtically pointless since we know it will be erased.

It's funny, even though the conversations between Chakotay and the dad frmo that 70s Show never 'happened', they are still some of my favourite lines from all of Voyager. Does this become untrue because it got erased? Is 'Yesterdays Enterprise' not a totally badass episode even though it got erased? All things happened, all things did not happen. Can't I enjoy T3 and The Sarah Connor Chronicles, just because they are in different timelines?

I like the Chakotay conversation but there is a spiritual angle involved that means he might have really been talking to dad. Granted it could just be Chakotay talking to himself in a sense. The most important thing though is the real Chakotay is involved in the scene. As for "Yesterday's Enterprise" that is a great episode as well. I like these episode's as well and it help's that it does make a impact later on with Sela. For the most part though your series shouldn't be built on a episode like this. "Voyager" made this mistake to many times. It can be fun and intresting but it does take away from your main characters because you don't really gain any insight in them or doesn't really help develop them all that much. You erase the Prime Universe then it means none of it matters. In the end who cares about Data's search to be human if he isn't even going to be created. Who cares about Sisko's having to sel out his morals in "Pale Moonlight" Chances are he won't be born in the new timeline and the Dominion War won't happen. Everything in a series I do think impacts on how we look back at reruns.
I'm not a huge fan of the American "Life on Mars" version of the show but if I was I know I couldn't look back at those episodes after knowing what I know will happen in the series final. Erasing the Prime universe would have to have a impact on how we look back at the reruns, unless you don't except the new movie as canon of course.

Jason
 
As for canon in the orignal universe as being a problem. I think this is very overstated by the fans and maybe even the writers. Most canon issues can be resolved with a line or two in most instances. If you want Starfleet people to see Romulans during the earth/starfleet war just say their appearence was classfied as a secret. A million other excues can be used as well. Canon should be observed in the sense that I feel like it helps give the trekverse some depth in that it makes the universe seem realisitc or realisitc as a universe with bumpy foreheaded aliens that speak english can be realisitc.

I disagree. When you can have main characters having plot-important conversations in three different places directly contradicting each other on obvious, daily-relevance components of the story world, you have a severe problem with convoluted and contradictory canon.

Case in point: http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Money

That article doesn't mention the several mentions of credits in exchange for goods and services in TOS, Uhura's offer to buy a tribble for 10 credits, or what's-her-name in TWOK talking about securing funding for research.

I understand that canon could sometimes contradict itself, but for the most part I felt they did do a good job of keeping it consitent. They did a good enough job to make the AQ feel like a real place with aliens that interact with each other and a poltical landscape exsited. Alot of the alien cultures were developed enough so we could sort of understand their cultures. Ds9 was particular good at this. Compare that to the DQ on "Voyager" were is was a bunch of bumpy-frehead aliens of the week that never interact with any of the other aliens. They did do this in the early seasons somewhat but that changed when Pillar left. Basically I didn't buy into the DQ because it didn't feel real and more importantly it wasn't a intresting setting. There was no real depth to that setting. In Sci-Fi I always feel that is important to make the universe in which your characters live in feel real, even in something as far-fetched as Star Trek. If anything it is more important in Trek because your dealing with bumpy-headed aliens that speak english and characters walking around in pajama's. :) You got to work hard to make that feel somewhat authenic.

Jason
 
Not getting involved here, but I wanted to point out one thing: normally (somewhere in the high 90th percentile) we see the characters go back in time, "fix" whatever, and come back "home" (whether you believe that to be an alternate imeline or their original one). The only real difference in STXI is that Spock and Nero didn't go "home" and the whole story is set in what is usually incidental to these stories, the altered past timeline. I was uncomfortable with it initally, but I do think it's a very smart and fresh way to do the ol' time travel plot again.

This whole discussion reminds me of two things:
1. Michael Crichton's book Timeline (NOT the movie with Paul Walker, thank you very much). There is a big part of the book that explains that what appears to be time travel is actually travel between realities. The best part is where they explain that they didn't create a machine to bring their time travellers back, their people simply reappeared in a reality where such a working machine had been created. Yeah, it had some big ol' plot holes, but it was a pretty interesting way of explaining it.

2. The Prestige. Hugh Jackman's character makes a comment at one point about how it took courage to do his "trick" every performance, because he never knew which one he'd be, "the one on the stage or the one in the box." In other words, he knew that the machine he was using in his performance was making two identical versions of himself, either one of which could continue on through his own life--one was not simply a copy of himself, both were truly him, each as valid and human as the other. In Star Trek, we have come to think of one timeline as the valid, correct one, when I think we've been introduced to several valid (and very similar) timelines over the years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top