• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Picard Paradox

Perhaps instead of travelling to the past of their own timeline, Spock and Nero accidentally travelled to the past of a parallel timeline (which, as you note, have been established to exist, Mirror Universe, Parallels.) This would explain why their actions do not effect the future of the Prime timeline, like is usually the case in Trek. And it having always been a parallel timeline would better explain how things are so different; Nero causing all that in such a short time really isn't a terribly plausible explanation.
Much better explanation than the official version, after all Prime did not do a quantum signature test on himself lol
 
Ent exists in BOTH the Prime and Kelvin timelines, since the skew happens after. Right?

That depends on whether or not you accept that it was just time travel to the Prime Universe's past to cause the split/rewrite, or whether you think they crossed over to a tangent, pre-existing universe like Mirror or Lazurus.
 
Makes a hell of a lot more sense than Simon Pegg's weird theory that Nero's arrival somehow changed the past as well as the future.

That said, I still prefer that everything prior to 2233 was the same. I'd like to see, for example, Captain Robau appear on DSC (Faran Tahir says he'd gladly do it), possibly as the President of the Federation. Or maybe we can find out what happened to Balthazar Edison in the prime timeline.

That is still my PREFERENCE, but that only works if we get an epilogue that wraps up the Kelvin and restores the Prime. If that never happens, then it must be adjacent, to have both timelines running at the same time. I do not accept that time travel creates permanent parallels, and not a timeline rewrite.
 
Ent exists in BOTH the Prime and Kelvin timelines, since the skew happens after. Right?
Yes, Admiral Marcus had a model of NX-01 on his desk. The implication is that the events of the series took place in the Kelvin timeline as well. That's confirmed with Balthazar Edison and the USS Franklin coming from that general era, with stuff that only appeared in ENT such as Xindi and MACOs .

Kor
 
Yes, Admiral Marcus had a model of NX-01 on his desk. The implication is that the events of the series took place in the Kelvin timeline as well. That's confirmed with Balthazar Edison and the USS Franklin coming from that general era, with stuff that only appeared in ENT such as Xindi and MACOs .

Kor

They make a lot of Enterprise references in the movies.

"Admiral Archer's dog" and all.

That is still my PREFERENCE, but that only works if we get an epilogue that wraps up the Kelvin and restores the Prime. If that never happens, then it must be adjacent, to have both timelines running at the same time. I do not accept that time travel creates permanent parallels, and not a timeline rewrite.

That's literally what was said in the movie.

Is it inconsistent? Yes.

But time travel is inconsistent in Star Trek.

Blame the fact they used Red Matter to travel.
 
One could say the USS Edison from "Battle of the Binary Stars" was named for Balthazar rather than Thomas, if they wished.

I don't think so...I have always suspected that Edison had ties to the Terra Prime movement.

It would explain his xenophobic tendencies (i.e. why he was so incensed at having to "break bread with the enemy" - normally, you'd think that a soldier like Edison would realize the importance of following orders, so if he was ordered to make peace with his enemies, he should have done so, without question), and also why Starfleet put a decorated war veteran in command of an insignificant ship like the Franklin - they wanted to get him out of the way, where he couldn't do any more damage.
 
Ent exists in BOTH the Prime and Kelvin timelines, since the skew happens after. Right?

Some argue that ENT is in its own timeline, since the events of First Contact -- where the Enterprise crew actively interferes in the course of history -- might have changed the future. I don't personally subscribe to that as I go with what the show-runners say is canon.
 
Some argue that ENT is in its own timeline, since the events of First Contact -- where the Enterprise crew actively interferes in the course of history -- might have changed the future. I don't personally subscribe to that as I go with what the show-runners say is canon.

I don't agree with that either.

As far as I'm concerned, ST:FC is part of what was supposed to happen, all along. A classic predestination paradox.

You can't prove it isn't, anyway.

(and after all, the Enterprise-E returned to the same future it left, so...well, you do the math. ;) )
 
Some argue that ENT is in its own timeline, since the events of First Contact -- where the Enterprise crew actively interferes in the course of history -- might have changed the future. I don't personally subscribe to that as I go with what the show-runners say is canon.
There is also... *sigh* the Temporal Cold War, which affected the timeline.
 
The ST Picard Paradox

We are all familiar with the „time paradox“ of physics that describes the apparent contradiction of travelling back in time to kill your parents prior to your conception so that you are never born to commit the act...

According to official reports, the planned Star Trek: Picard series takes place along a „timeline“ (whatever that is!) following the destruction of Romulus by a Supernova that leads to renegade Romulan, Nero, travelling a century into the past where he destroys Vulcan, an event that cannot be hidden and gives the Romulans a century warning to avoid or prevent the disaster.

Captain Pike to Nero (Star Trek „reboot“): „...Romulus hasnt been destroyed. Its out there right now. You’re blaming the Federation for something that hasn’t happened.“

In other words, the timeline with Romulus being destroyed saves Romulus and destroys Vulcan so, any timeline following the detruction of Romulus does not exist. The Star Trek: Picard Paradox is born.

If the timeline that no longer exists is used, remember that, thanks to Janeway and her final encounter with the Borg, Starfleet now has starship shielding technology that is impenetrable and photonic and other weaponry that eliminates Borg vessels with a single shot. In other words, Starfleet and the Federation, especially without Romulans, is invincible. That would make little room for conflict even at the Species 8472 level. I look forward to the artistic quality of stories without all the silly space battles, ridiculous explosions, the always getting bigger (hand) weapons, and foolish fist fights.

Ayko

By the way, I completely agree with you, although its not a popular one. If it was time travel, the Kelvin movies absolutely wiped out the prime universe - so unless it was an adjacent universe instead, then one must assume that there is an unseen "closing" chapter to the Kelvinverse, most likely a Very Old Spock stopping the destruction of Romulus on the second time around, negating Nero's time travel to begin with, and snapping the Universe back to Prime.
 
There is also... *sigh* the Temporal Cold War, which affected the timeline.

I think FC rewrote the TOS timeline into ENT->DSC->(?) thus explaining the visual reboot (based on Borg and 24th century tech found in FC and ENT). Wouldn't it be something, if the TCW was all because of the Kelvin rewrite, and was actually the battle over which universe would remain?
 
Why? It makes infinitely more sense than rewrites ever did.

How? Every time the past is changed, the future is permanently altered, with the "saving our future!" urgency to repair the damage. City on the Edge, Yesterdays Enterprise, First Contact, Endgame, even Voyage Home all suffer both dramatically, narratively and thematically if they did absolutely nothing but create a new branch of the timeline, leaving all that war, destruction and ruin behind them. Trek has shown that time travel can easily change or wipe out your own future if you're not careful, and that alternate universes exist all on their own (and not necessarily lined up temporally, as In a Mirror Darkly) implies. I would suggest that the same thing happened in '09 (tunneled over to an alternate universe where time was running differently and it was still the 23rd, or being flung over AND back at the same time.)

Predestination Paradoxes are just proof of a horribly corrupt timeline caught in a loop for so long that the initial timeline, causes and reasons are no longer accessible, or even able to be remembered.

My ideal explanation is there is just an unseen closing chapter to the Kelvinverse, but until then I am sticking with always-existing alternate universe.
 
Last edited:
They make a lot of Enterprise references in the movies.

"Admiral Archer's dog" and all.



That's literally what was said in the movie.

Is it inconsistent? Yes.

But time travel is inconsistent in Star Trek.

Blame the fact they used Red Matter to travel.

I don't think the movie itself specified. Characters assumed what was going on, of course - but would they really know the difference between an alternate universe and alternate timeline? They just knew things had been changed. I don't think the mechanism for time travel really matters, as a string of casual events would not care what external apparatus would use IMO - thats why I think the red matter drilling into an alternate universe idea would make much more sense, unless there is an unseen closing chapter for the Kelvin.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top