If you look at the shot in Voyager's opening sequence where it flies over the rings of some planet, the reflection in the rings shows Voyager is actualy about this size.
That could have been a very small moon.
The Photoshop Thread, Part IV
- Thread starter Shaw
- Start date
That could have been a very small moon.
Except the planet looks as if it has a very thick atmosphere, a little moon is too light to hold rings, the objects in the rings would be clearly visible, and the planet and it's possible other moons would mess up the rings.
"thats no moon..."If you look at the shot in Voyager's opening sequence where it flies over the rings of some planet, the reflection in the rings shows Voyager is actualy about this size.
That could have been a very small moon.
Coulda been a small gas giant.
I'm pretty sure there is no such thing. they are called giants for a reason
Nu-ah, nu-ah! It's on screen! It's canon! Clearly, at some point during its continuing journey through the Delta Quadrant, the Voyager turned humongous. Yet somehow, its gravitational-pull remained tiny. And see this every week, in the same place...they must have been stuck in some kind of temporal causality loop. This would also explain the re-runs. But they never discovered it during the course of the show - that's canon too. ...Those poor people.
It's not a reflection but a glow (stimulated photon emission after electron excitation at the surfaces of ring fragments caused by Voyager's Bussard collectors).
^^ It's worrying how much Shatner suits that hair!
James Tiberius Garfunkel thanks you for your support.
Here's a two-for-one Trek photoshopping deal:
Here's a comparison between my reenginered Abramsprise (top) and the plain old Abramsprise (bottom).
Here's a comparison between my reenginered Abramsprise (top) and the plain old Abramsprise (bottom).
Similar threads
