Ha! It does look like a real magazine cover.
That one's pretty good
The reason I said Season 1 TNG was that he didn't have the beard...
Some of mine...
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Goldie as a mirror-universe yeoman is my favorite.
I know it's OT, but just curious.. what does Google have to do with board policy?
I'm wondering the same thing too
It's here, in Announcements.I know it's OT, but just curious.. what does Google have to do with board policy?
I'm wondering the same thing too
Someone more informed/familiar with the situation should probably explain this and will likely do so in a better way than this, but the basic jist of it is that Google, which owns the company that generates the ads this site uses to generate it's income, cracked down on some of the more risque (according to them) content on the board last month. T'Bonz and the mods had to go around and clean up anything (avatars, pictures, threads, fan fic) that might be objectionable by the new standards Google dictated, otherwise they'd pull the ads and the board would be effectively shut down.
Considering the photoshopped image that was removed here, it's easy to see why it would have been problematic.
I'm sure there's a thread about it somewhere, but I can't seem to locate it at the moment, but that's the basic story.
It's here, in Announcements.I know it's OT, but just curious.. what does Google have to do with board policy?
I'm wondering the same thing too
Someone more informed/familiar with the situation should probably explain this and will likely do so in a better way than this, but the basic jist of it is that Google, which owns the company that generates the ads this site uses to generate it's income, cracked down on some of the more risque (according to them) content on the board last month. T'Bonz and the mods had to go around and clean up anything (avatars, pictures, threads, fan fic) that might be objectionable by the new standards Google dictated, otherwise they'd pull the ads and the board would be effectively shut down.
Considering the photoshopped image that was removed here, it's easy to see why it would have been problematic.
I'm sure there's a thread about it somewhere, but I can't seem to locate it at the moment, but that's the basic story.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.